Efforts To Prevent Criminal Acts Of Corruption By The Repbulic Of Indonesia Prosecutor Office Trough The Return Of State Financial Losess Reviewed From The Value Of Justice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v20i1.14714Keywords:
return, loss, country, corruptionAbstract
Corruption is a global challenge that crosses national borders and various sectors of development. This act of corruption is not only a threat to economic stability, but also becomes an obstacle in achieving sustainable development. The state has a responsibility to fulfill the rights to basic community needs in the context of public services. The Indonesian government, as mandated by the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia regarding public services, has an obligation to build public trust in accordance with the demands and expectations of the community. This article discusses the problem of how the Prosecutor's Office attempts to recover state financial losses by perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption and the concept of recovering state financial losses based on the values of welfare and justice. The method used in this writing is a normative research method. The results of this research are the efforts that can be taken by the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia to recover state financial losses caused by criminal acts of corruption, which can be started at the investigation stage. So that the implementation of a punishment based on the values of welfare and justice will provide benefits to the state structure and improve the welfare of the Indonesian nation.
References
Afdhali, Dino Rizka, dan Taufiqurrohman Syahuri. “Idealitas Penegakkan Hukum Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Teori Tujuan Hukum.” Collegium Studiosum Journal 6, no. 2 (2023): 555–61. https://doi.org/10.56301/csj.v6i2.1078.
Akbar, Muhammad Fatahillah. “Pembaharuan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 51, no. 2 (2022): 199–208. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.2.2022.199-208.
Alfarizzy, Alfarrizy, Bambang Hartono, dan Zainudin Hasan. “Implementasi Pertanggung Jawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Penyalah Gunaan Anggaran Pendahuluan Dan Belanja Kampung (Apbk) Yang Dilakukan Oleh Oknum Mantan Kepala Kampung Menanga Jaya (Studi Kasus Nomor:13/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2020/Pn.Tjk).” Iblam Law Review 1, no. 3 (2021): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.52249/ilr.v1i3.24.
Amtiran, Paulina Y. “Amtiran and Molidya/ JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (SME’s) Vol. 12, No.2, 2020, p203-214” 12, no. 2 (2020): 203–14.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Mediasi Penal Penyelesaian Perkara di Luar Pengadilan. Semarang: Pustaka Magister, 2012.
———. Tujuan dan Pedoman Pemidanaan. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2009.
Batubara, Juliari. “Wabah Korupsi di kala Pandemi : Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Selama Pandemi sebagai Refleksi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia.” Jurnal Anti Korupsi 3, no. 1 (2021): 113–38. https://doi.org/10.19184/jak.v3i1.27135.
Effendy, Marwan. Kejaksaan RI Posisi dan Fungsinya Dari Perspektif Hukum. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2005.
Friedman, Lawrence M. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 1975.
Hasibuan, M. Harris Sofian, Syafruddin Kalo, Hasyim Purba, dan Mahmud Mulyadi. “Penerapan Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi Terhadap Kejahatan Manipulasi Data Agunan Dalam Pengajuan Kredit Pada Bank BUMD.” Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review 1, no. 1 (2022): 59–70. https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v1i1.52.
Hastuti, Kurnia Siwi. “Pembaharuan Hukum Pedoman Pemidanaan terhadap Disparitas Putusan Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) 2, no. 2 (2021): 92–102. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v2i2.12294.
Helena Hestaria, Made Sugi Hartono, dan Muhamad Jodi Setianto. “Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Rangka Penyelamatan Keuangan Negara.” Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia 5, no. 3 (2022): 112–28. https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v5i3.51892.
Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Pembuktian Terbalik dalam Pengembalian Aset Kejahatan Korupsi. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada, 2012.
Ifrani, Ifrani, dan M. Yasir Said. “Kebijakan Kriminal Non-Penal OJK dalam Mengatasi Kejatan Cyber Melalui Sistem PEER to PEER Lending” 12, no. 1 (2020): 61–76. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v12i1.2607.
Ikhlasul Amal Imaduddin, dan Ali Muhammad. “Upaya Restorative Justice dalam Penanganan Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Journal Sains Student Research 1, no. 1 (2023): 339–46. https://doi.org/10.61722/jssr.v1i1.106.
Julranda, Rizky, Michael Geremia Siagian, dan Michael Ariel Perdana Zalukhu. “Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang Masyarakat Hukum Adat.” Jurnal Crepido 04, no. 02 (2022): 171–83.
Kalo, Syaruddin dkk. “Analisis Yuridis Penentuan Kedudukan Saksi Pelaku Sebagai Justice Collaborators Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika di Pengadilan Negeri Pematang Siantar (Studi Putusan No: 231/Pid.Sus/2015/Pn).” USU Law Journal 5, no. 3 (2017): 108–17.
Klitgaard, Robert. “Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pengertian Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Legislatif 4, no. 2 (2021): 176.
Kumakauw, Visilia, Butje Tampi, dan Refly Umbas. “KAJIAN HUKUM MENGENAI PENGEMBALIAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI 1 Oleh: Visilia Kumakauw 2 Butje Tampi 3 Refly Umbas 4” X, no. 13 (2021): 146–54.
Kurniawan, Fajri, Muhammad Syammakh Daffa Alghazali, dan Afdhal Fadhila. “Determinasi Upaya Pemulihan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Melalui Peran Kejaksaan terhadap Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 3, no. 7 (2022): 565–88. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i7.279.
Makaro, Muhammad Taufik. Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana: Studi Tentang Bentuk-Bentuk Pidana Khususnya Pidana Cambuk Sebagai Suatu Bentuk Pemidanaan. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana, 2005.
Miladmahesi, Rosita. “Dinamika Baru Dalam Pemulihan Aset Akibat Korupsi di Indonesia.” Journal of Judicial Review 22, no. 01 (2020): 14–31. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v22i1.720.
Muladi. Kapita Selekta Sistim Peradilan Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1995.
Nurfaqih, Irfani. “Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, Dan Lex Posterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 16, no. 3 (2020): 305–25.
Nurhayati, Yati, Ifrani Ifrani, dan M. Yasir Said. “Metodologi Normatif Dan Empiris Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 1 (2021): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.14.
Pattipeilohy, Lukas, Yakobus Adi Saingo, Agama Kristen, dan Negeri Kupang. “Pancasila Sebagai Dasar Sistem Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisipline 1, no. 10 (2023): 355–65. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10137903.
Pryhatoro, Edy Herry. Korupsi dalam Perspektif Teori Sosial Kontemporer. Jakarta: Spasi Media, 2016.
Purnomo, Andi. “Pendekatan Restorative Justice Dalam Menyelesaikan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Dalam Hal Pemulihan Keuangan Negara.” Justicia Sains: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (2023): 531–43. https://doi.org/10.24967/jcs.v8i2.2662.
Putra, Diky Anandya Kharystya, dan Vidya Prahassacitta. “Tinjauan Atas Kriminalisasi Illicit Enrichment dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia: Studi Perbandingan dengan Australia.” Indonesia Criminal Law Review 1, no. 1 (2021): 43–59. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/iclr/.
Ridho Mubarak, Wessy Trisna. “Determination Of State Financial Loss Due To Abuse Of The Authority Of Government Officers (Penentuan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Akibat Penyalahgunaan Kewenangan Pejabat Pemerintah).” Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum 8, no. 2 (2021): 160–73.
Riyadi. Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Strategi Mengendalikan Potensi Dalam Mewujudkan Otonami Daerah. Jakarta: Gramedia, 2002.
Saputro, Heri Joko, dan Tofik Yanuar Chandra. “Urgensi Pemulihan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Melalui Tindakan Pemblokiran Dan Perampasan Asset Sebagai Strategi Penegakan Hukum Korupsi.” Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law 5, no. 2 (2021): 273. https://doi.org/10.32507/mizan.v5i2.1033.
Satria, Harimana. “Kebijakan kriminal pencegahan korupsi publik.” Jurnal Antikorupsi 6, no. 2 (2022): 169–86. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i2.660.
Savitri, Chici, Iqbal Nuriswandi, Shendy Rahmat Farhan, Azahra Widiadhari, dan Aldi Prasetiawan Saputra. “TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERBANDINGAN SISTEM HUKUM INDONESIA DAN BELANDA DALAM PENANGANAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI.” JURNAL INOVASI HUKUM 6, no. 2 (2025): 182–94. https://ejurnals.com/ojs/index.php/jih/article/view/1711/2066.
Setiady, Tolib. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Penitensier Indonesia. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2010.
Shidarta. Moralitas Profesi Hukum Suatu Tawaran Kerangka Berfikir. Bandung: PT. Revika Aditama, 2006.
Sindarto, Sebastian. “Kebijakan Penyelamatan Keuangan Negara Dari Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Progresif.” Reformasi Hukum 25, no. 2 (2021): 182–201. https://doi.org/10.46257/jrh.v25i2.321.
Soekanto, Soejono. Teori Peranan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2002.
Syaifulloh, Abvianto. “Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law 1, no. 1 (2019): 47–64. https://doi.org/10.31960/ijocl.v1i1.147.
Syakila, Rima Mangheskhar, dan Mohammad Saleh. “Perampasan Aset Terpidana Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Pemulihan Keuangan Negara.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik 4, no. 4 (2024): 762–68. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i4.2070.
Tania, Neysa, Jason Novienco, dan Dixon Sanjaya. “Kajian Teori Hukum Progresif Terhadap Implementasi Produk Tabungan Perumahan Rakyat.” Perspektif 26, no. 2 (2021): 73–87. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v26i2.800.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
14714Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rizky Ika Pratiwi, Pujiyono, Budi Ispriyarso (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) is an open-access license that facilitates the sharing and adaptation of creative works while ensuring proper attribution and preserving the same freedoms for derivative works. This license is designed to be user-friendly and applicable globally, making it a popular choice for a wide range of content, from academic articles to creative arts.
At its core, the Attribution component of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license requires users to give appropriate credit to the original creator of the work. This includes providing a clear citation, linking to the license, and indicating any modifications made. The attribution must be done in a way that does not imply endorsement by the creator of the new use or its creator. This ensures that the original authors are acknowledged for their contributions while allowing their work to be freely used and disseminated.
The ShareAlike aspect of the license mandates that any derivative works or adaptations created from the original must be licensed under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 terms. This means that new works based on the original content must also be freely available and shareable under the same conditions. This provision helps to promote a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement, as it ensures that all adaptations remain accessible to the public and contribute to the collective pool of knowledge and creativity.
