PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PERKULIAHAN EKSPERIMEN FISIKA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KREATIVITAS MAHASISWA CALON GURU DALAM MENDESAIN KEGIATAN PRAKTIKUM FISIKA DI SMA

H. S. Wattimena(1), A. Suhandi(2), A. Setiawan(3),

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v10i2.3448


(1) Jl. Ir. M. Putuhena, Poka, Ambon
(2) Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
(3) Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan perangkat perkuliahan eksperimen fisika yang dapat meningkatkan kreativitas mahasiswa calon guru dalam mendesain kegiatan praktikum fisika SMA. Mixed methods research melalui embedded experimental model dengan strategi embedded, digunakan sebagai metode penelitian sebagai tahap pengumpulan data kuantitatif dan kualitatif dalam satu waktu; yang melibatkan mahasiswa program studi Pendidikan Fisika salah satu LPTK di Maluku. Perangkat perkuliahan yang dikembangkan diadaptasikan dari pola pembelajaran kreatif yang disebut sebagai Aspek Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif (AKBK); aktivitas mahasiswa dalam mendesain kegiatan praktikum diarahkan pada Indikator Kegiatan Dalam Bereksperimen (IKDB). Pemahaman konsep fisika mahasiswa diukur berdasarkan taksonomi Bloom revisi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, terjadi peningkatan AKBK mahasiswa untuk setiap IKDB pada kriteria sedang; serta peningkatan pemahaman konsep-konsep dasar fisika mahasiswa untuk indikator mencontohkan, mengklasifikasikan, dan menjelaskan pada kriteria sedang. Disimpulkan bahwa perangkat perkuliahan eksperimen fisika yang dikembangkan dapat meningkatkan kreativitas mahasiswa dalam mendesain kegiatan praktikum fisika berdasarkan cakupan materi yang terukur.

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to develop the lectures instrument of physics experiment to improve the creativity of preservice teachers in designing a high school physics lab activities. Mixed methods research through the embedded experimental models with embedded strategy, was used as a method of research, a stage of quantitative and qualitative data collection at a time, involving students of Physical Education courses one LPTK in Maluku. The developed lectures instrument adapted from creative learning pattern was referred to as Creative Thinking Skills aspect (CTSA), while student activity in the design of practical activities were directed at Activity Indicator In Experiment (SIEI). Understanding the concept of physics students was measured based on the revised Bloom's taxonomy. The results showed an increase in students CTSA for each SIEI on the criteria of being; as well as an improve understanding of the basic concepts of physics students to cite, classify, and explain indicators. It was concluded that the developed lectures instrument of physics experiment can enhance student creativity in the design of physics experiment activities based on the coverage of the measured material.

Keywords

learning instrument; creativity; physics practical work design

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abrahams, I & Millar, R. (2008). Does Practical Work Really Work? A study of The Effectiveness of Practical Work as a Teaching and Learning Method in School Science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14): 1945–1969.

Adir, J. (2007). Berpikir Kreatif – Berpikir Sukses. Penerjemah: Izi Ibrahim 2009. Yogyakarta: Rumpun Press.

Ai-Girl, T. & Lai-Chong, L. (1991). Creativity for Teachers: Teaching and Learning Series. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish International.

Anderson, W. L., Krathwohl, R. D., et al. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Abridged Edition. United States: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Awang, H & Ramly, I. (2008). Creative Thinking Skill Approach Through Problem-Based Learning: Pedagogy and Practice in the Engineering Classroom. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 3(1).

Brewe, E., Kramer, L., and O’Brien, G. (2009). Modeling Instruction: Positive Attitudinal Shifts in Introductory Physics Measured with Class. Physics Review Special Topics Physics Educational Resource. 5(1): 013102.

Cheng, M. Y. V. (2004). Developing Physics Learning Activities for Fostering Student Creativity in Hong Kong Context. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching Journals. 5(8).

Cheng, M. Y. V. (2010). Teaching Creative Thinking in Regular Science Lessons: Potentials and Obstacles of Three Different Approaches in an Asian Context. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1): 1-17.

Cockman, J. (2008). Cookbook vs. Inquiry. TAP-L Discussion Group. (Online) (Tersedia: http://www.lists.nesu.edu/cgi-bin/digest?list1, diakses, 18/01/2012).

Creswell, W. J. & Clarck, P. L. V. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

Cropley A. J. & Cropley, D. H. (2008). Fostering and Measuring Creativity and Inn-ovation: Individuals, Organisations and Products. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38: 355-373.

Dahar, R. W. (2011). Teori-Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Danielsson, A. T. (2011). Characterising the Practice of Physics as Enacted in University Student Laboratories Using ‘Discourse Models’ as an Analytical Tool. Nordina Journals 7(2) Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, UK.

Ditjen Dikti, (2008). Kurikulum Pendidikan MIPA S-1. Jakarta: Dikti.

Etkina, E., Murthy, S. and Zou, X. (2006). Using Introductory Labs to Engage Students in Experimental Design, American Journal of Physics, 74: 979.

Evans, J. R. (2003). Creative Thinking: In the Decision and Management Sciences. University of Cincinnati Singapore: South-Western Publishing Co.

Feynman, R. (1998) Goals of the Introductory Physics Laboratory. Association of Physics Teachers. American Journals Physics. 66(6).

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., Borg, W. R. (2003). Education Research: An Introduction. Seventh edition. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Gardner, H. (1999). The Discipline Mind: What All Students Should Understand. New York: Simon & Schuster Inc.

Giampietro, M. & Cavallera G. M. (2006). Morning and Evening Types and Creative Thinking. Elsevier Journals, 453-463.

Gredler, M. E. (2011). Learning and Instruction: Teori dan Aplikasi. Alih Bahasa: Tri Wibowo. Jakarta: Kencana Prenanda Media Group.

Guilford, J. P. (1977), Way Beyond the IQ. Buffalo, New York: Creative Learning Press.

Guilford, J. P. (1988). Some Changes in the Structure of Intellect Model. Educational and Psychological Measurement Journals, 48: 1-4.

Gunawan. (2010). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis MMI untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep Calon Guru pada Materi Elastisitas. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA. 2(1): 11-21.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Charge/Gain Score [Online]. Tersedia: http://www. physics.indiana-.edu/~sdi/AnalyzingChange-Gain.pdf. [27 Desember 2013].

Hays, W. L. (1976). Quantification in Psychology. New Delhi: Prentice Hall.

Jiazeng, Li., Yanbao Li., Yi, Chen., Wenxian, Wei. (1995). Evaluating of Creative Thinking of Students and Creativity Development. Southeast University, China.

Kim, K. H. (2006). Can We Trust Creativity Tests? A Review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18(1): 3-14.

Koray, Ö & Köksal, S. M. (2009). The Effect of Creative and Critical Thinking Based Laboratory Applications on Creative and Logical Thinking Abilities of Prospective Teachers. Journal of Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 10(1): 1-8.

Learning and Teaching Scotland and the Idea Network (LTSIN). (2004). Learning Thinking. Scotland: Learning and Thinking School.

Lawson, A. E. (1980). Science Education Information Report, 1980 AETS Yearbook The Psychology of Teaching for Thinking and Creativity. Ohio: Clearinghouse.

McDermott, C. L. (1999). A Perspective on Teacher Preparation in Physics and Other Sciences. American Journal of Physics. 58(8).

Munandar, S. C. U. (1999). Kreativitas dan Keberbakatan: Strategi Mewujudkan Potensi Kreatif dan Bakat. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and The National Science Education Standard A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

National Research Council. (NRC). (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Nivalainen, V., Asikainen, M. A., and Hirvonen, P. E. (2013). Preservice Teachers Objectives and Their Experience of Practical Work. Physical review special topics–physics education research. American Physical Society, 10.1103 Phys-Rev-STPER.9.010102.

Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1985). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Popper, K. (2005). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. This edition published. New York: The Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Potur, A. A. & Barkul, Ö. (2009). Gender and Creative Thinking in Education: A Theoretical and Experimental Overview. Journal of ITU A|Z. Vol: 6 No: 244-57-2009-2.

Putra, S. R. (2013). Desain Belajar Mengajar Kreatif Berbasis Sains. Yogyakarta: DIVA Press.

Purwanto, B. (2011). Pentingnya Kreativitas Guru dan Calon Guru Fisika SMA da-lam Upaya Pengembangan dan Pengadaan Alat Demonstrasi/Eksperimen untuk Menjelaskan Konsep Dasar Fisika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Peneliti-an, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA, 14 Mei 2011-FMIPA UNY. Yogyakarta.

Pyatt, K & Sims, R. (2007). Learner Performance and Attitude in Traditional versus Simulated Laboratory Experiences. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007: Full paper. pp. 870-879.

Reif, F. (1995). Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding an Teaching Important Scientific Thought Processes. American Journal of Physics. 63 (1).

Santyasa, I W. (2003). Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Keterampilan Berpikir Sebagai Alternatif Implementasi KBK. Makalah. Disajikan dalam Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pembelajaran, 22-23 Agustus 2003. Yogyakarta.

Saul, J and Redish, E. (1998) An Evaluation of the Workshop Physics Dissemination Project. Unpublished report, Dep. of Physics, University of Maryland.

Supriadi, Dedi (1994), Kreativitas, Kebudayaan & Perkembangan Iptek. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sternberg, J. R. (2006). The Nature of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1): 87–98.

Sternberg, J. R., & Williams, M. V. (1996). How to Develop Student Creativity. The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (Online). (Tersedia: http://www.ozpk.tripod.com/c-opyright.html, diakses 16 Januari 2012).

Torrance, E. P. (1972) Scientific Views of Creativity and Factors Affecting Its Growth. The MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts & Sciences Daedalus Journals, 94(3): 663-681.

Trna, J., & Novak, P. (2010). Motivational Effectiveness of Experiments in Physics Education. Masaryk University, Faculty of Education, Brno, Czech Republic.

Utari, S. (2010). Pengembangan Program Perkuliahan untuk Membekali Calon Guru dalam Merencanakan Kegiatan Eksperimen Fisika di Sekolah Menengah. Disertasi. Tidak diterbitkan. Bandung: PPs Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Wang, Y. A. (2011). Contexts of Creative Thinking: A Comparison on Creative Performance of Student Teachers in Taiwan and the United States. Jurnal of International and cross-Cultural Studies. 2(1).

Wattimena, H. S., Suhandi, A., Setiawan, A. (2014). Profil Penyelenggaraan Praktikum Fisika Sekolah Sebagai Penyiapan Mengembangkan Kreativitas Calon Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar PGSD FKIP Unpatti. 2(6).

Wenning, C. J. (2006). A Framework for Teaching The Nature of Science. Journal of Physics Teacher Education Online. 3(3): 3-10.

Wenning, C. J. & Wenning, R. (2006). A Generic Model for Inquiry-Oriented Labs in Postsecondary Introductory Physics. Journal of Physics Teacher Education.

Wenno, I. H., Wattimena, H. S., Watuguly, Th. W. (2009). Penelitian dan Pengembangan Model Modul (LKS Eksperimen dan LKS non Eksperimen Berbasis Problem Solving Method) di SMP Se Provinsi Maluku. Penelitian Hibah Bersaing Dikti 2007-2009.

Widodo, A. (2006). Taksonomi Bloom dan Pengembangan Butir Soal. Buletin Puspendik. 3(2): 18-29.

Wiyanto, (2005-b). Pengembangan Kemampuan Merancang Kegiatan Laboratorium Fisika Berbasis Inkuiri bagi Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Jurnal Universitas Negeri Semarang – Jurusan Fisika FMIPA. Semarang.

Yamin, H. M. (2013). Paradigma Baru Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Referensi.

Yan-Piaw, C. (2004). Creative and Critical Thinking Styles. Malaysia: UPM.

Zhaoyao, M. (2002). Physics Education for the 21st Century: Avoiding a Crisis. Physics Education. 37(1): 7-8.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License