CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN INTEGRATED SCIENCE LEARNING VIEWED FROM LEARNING MOTIVATION
(1) Departement of Physics Education, Faculty of Science and Technology Islamic State University Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Science and Technology Islamic State University Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Science and Technology Islamic State University Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
The study aimed to determine the effect of Predict Discuss Explain Observe Discuss Explain and Small Group Discussion strategies toward critical thinking skills and the influence of learning motivation toward critical thinking skills. This study was a quasi experiment with the non-equivalent pretest-posttest design. Data were analysed by inferential statistics of two way analysis of variance and regression analysis. The results showed that Predict Discuss Explain Observe Discuss Explain and Small Group Discussion strategies were influential toward critical thinking skills and the average of students critical thinking skills using Small Group Discussion strategy was better than those experiencing Predict Discuss Explain Observe Discuss Explain strategy. Furthermore, learning motivation were also influential toward critical thinking skills. Students having high learning motivation were better than students having low learning motivation. Regression analysis showed learning motivation and critical thinking skills have positive correlation. Influence of learning motivation toward critical thinking skill was about 6.4%.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh strategi Predict Discuss Explain Observe Discuss Explain dan Small Group Discussion terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan pengaruh motivasi belajar terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian quasi experiment menggunakan desain the non-equivalent pretest-posttest. Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik inferensial Analisi Varian dua jalur dan analisis regresi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi Predict Discuss Explain Observe Discuss Explain dan Small Group Discussion berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis, rata-rata kemampuan berpikir krtis siswa yang menggunakan strategi Small Group Discussion lebih baik daripada siswa yang menggunakan strategi Predict Discuss Explain Observe Discuss Explain. Selain itu, motivasi belajar berpengaruh terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis. Rata-rata kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa yang mempunyai motivasi belajar tinggi lebih baik daripada siswa yang mempunyai motivasi belajar rendah. Berdasarkan analisis regresi, motivasi belajar dan kemampuan berpikir kritis memiliki hubungan yang positif. Motivasi belajar memberikan pengaruh sebesar 6,4% terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afandi, D., Budiningsih, Y., Safitry, O., Purwadianto, A., Novitasari, D., Widjaja, I.R. (2009). Effect of an additional small group discussion to cognitive achievement and retention in basic principles of bioethics teaching methods. Med J Indones, 18, 48-52. Retrieved from http://imsear.li.mahidol.ac.th/bitstream/123456789/148968/1/mji2009v18n1p48.pdf.
Applebee, A. N., Langer, J. A., Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 685-730. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.452.9834&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Atkinson, R.L., Ricard, S.A., Ernest, R.H. (1997). Pengantar psikologi jilid 2 (8th ed). (Nurdjannah, Trans). Jakarta: Erlangga. (Original Work published 1983).
Best, J. B. (1982). Metodologi penelitian dan pendidikan (S. Faisal & M. G. Waseso, Trans). Surabaya: USANA OFFSET PRINTING. (Original Work published 1977).
Budiyono. (2009). Statistika untuk penelitian. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Costu, B. (2008). Learning science through the PDEODE teaching strategy: Helping students make sense of everyday situations. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Tecnology Education, 4, 3-9. Retrieved from http://ejmste.com/v4n1/Eurasia_v4n1_Costu.pdf.
Djamarah, S. B., Zain, A. (2002). Strategi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Fogarty, R. (1991). How to integrate the curricula. Palatine: IRI/Skylight Publishing, Inc.
Hamdu, G., Agustina, L. (2011). Pengaruh motivasi belajar terhadap prestasi belajar IPA di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 12, 90-96. Retrieved from http://jurnal.upi.edu/file/8-Ghullam_Hamdu.pdf.
Johnson, E. B. (2012). Contextual teaching Learning. (I. Setiawan, Trans). Bandung: Kaifa. (Original Work published 2002).
Kurniawati, I.D., Wartono., Diantoro, M. (2014). Pengaruh pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing integrasi peer instruction terhadap penguasaan konsep dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 10 (2014), 36-46.
Permendiknas. (2006). Kurikulum 2006 standar isi. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Puskur. (2006). Model pengembangan silabus mata pelajaran dan rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran IPA terpadu. Jakarta: Balitbang, Depdiknas.
Purwanto. (2008). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif untuk psikologi dan pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rahayu, S., Sugiyarto., Sunarno, W. (2013). Pembelajaran IPA melalui pendekatan kontekstual menggunakan simulasi komputer dan model kerja ditinjau dari kemampuan berpikir kritis dan gaya belajar. Jurnal Inkuiri, 2, 279-287. Retrieved from http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/sains/article/download/3829/2705.
Rane, S., Kolari, S. (2003). Promoting the conceptual understading of engineering student through visualization. Global J. of Engng. Educ, 7, 189-199. Retrieved from http://www.wieta.com.au/journals/GJEE?Publish/vol7no2/SavRanneKolari.pdf
Sa’idah, G., Suyono. (2012). Penerapan strategi pembelajaran PDEODE (PREDICT, DISCUSS, EXPLAIN, OBSERVE, DISCUSS, EXPLAIN) untuk mereduksi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi pokok hidrolisis garam di SMAN 2 Bojonegoro. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kimia Unesa. Surabaya: Program Studi Kimia S1 FMIPA UNESA.
Sardiman. (2007). Interaksi & motivasi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Schunk, D.H. (2012). Learning theories an educational perspective (6th ed.) (E. Hamdiah & R. Fajar, Trans). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. (Original Work published 2012).
Siregar, E., Nara, H. (2010). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Siregar, S. (2013). Metode penelitian KUANTITATIF dilengkapi dengan perbandingan perhitungan manual & SPSS. Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Sitepu, S. (2011). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran berbasis masalah dan motivasi belajar terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar Biologi SMA Negeri 1 Lubukpakam. (Unpublished Magister Thesis). Program Pasca Sarjana UNIMED, Medan.
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Education physhology theory and practice (10th ed.). London: Pearson.
Sugoyono. (2012). Statistik untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susilo, A. B., Wijayanto., Suartono. (2012). Model pembelajaran ipa berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan berpikir kritis siswa smp. Unnes Science Education Journal 1, 12-20. Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/usej/article/download/849/873.
Trianto. (2011). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu: Konsep, Strategi, dan Implementasinya dalam Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Widoyoko, E.P. (2012). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License