PENGARUH BLENDED LEARNING TERHADAP PENGUASAAN KONSEP DAN PENALARAN FISIKA PESERTA DIDIK KELAS X

Hermawanto -, S. Kusairi, Wartono -

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan 1) Mengetahui pengaruh blended learning terhadap penguasaan konsep fisika 2) Mengetahui pengaruh blended learning terhadap penalaran fisika. Rancangan yang digunakan adalah Randomized Posttest only Control Group Design. Populasinya adalah peserta didik kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Batu. Sampelnya yaitu kelas X-6 dan X-10 sebagai kelas eksperimen, kelas X-11 dan X-12 sebagai kelas kontrol. Hasil uji t penguasan konsep didapat thitung = 6,64 > = ttabel =1,66, menunjukkan ada perbedaan, sedangkan untuk uji lanjut yaitu uji Tuckey menunjukkan Qhitung = 7,55 > Q tabel = 2,85, menunjukan bahwa penguasaan konsep peserta didik yang menggunakan blended learning lebih tinggi dari pada konvensional. Berkaitan dengan penalaran, hasil uji t menunjukkan thitung = 2,65 > ttabel = 1,66, menunjukkan ada perbedaan. Sedangkan untuk uji lanjut yaitu uji Tuckey menunjukkan Qhitung = 3,19 > Qtabel = 2,85, menunjukkan bahwa penalaran peserta didik yang menggunakan blended learning lebih tinggi dari pada konvensional. Simpulan penelitian ini adalah 1) Ada pengaruh blended learning terhadap penguasaan konsep fisika, 2) Ada pengaruh blended learning terhadap penalaran fisika. Pembelajaran blended learning dapat meningkatkan penguasaan konsep dan penalaran fisika serta melatih peserta didik untuk mandiri dan aktif.

 


TThe aims of this research are 1) knowing the influence of blended learning study toward concept physics achievement and 2) knowing the influence of blended learning toward physics reasoning. This research used Randomized Posttest only Control Group Design and conducted in odd semester 2012-2013 academic year. The research population were students of grade X in senior high school 1 Batu. The research samples were four classes: X-6 and X-10 as the experiment classes and X-11 and X-12 as the control classes. The instrument is test of physics concept achievement and physics reasoning in multiple choice form. The results showed that there was no difference between the concept physics achievement who studied with and without blended learning, while further test the Tuckey test showed QResult= 7.55> Q Table = 2.85 indicating that the students’ mastery of concepts using blended learning was higher than the conventional one. In terms of physics reasoning, test results showed tResult t = 2.65> tTable = 1.66, showing that there was no difference in physics reasoning between students who learn with blended and without blended. Additionally, for the further Tuckey test showed QResult = 3.19> QTabel = 2.85, indicating that the reasoning of learners who used blended learning was higher than conventional. It was concluded that 1) there is the influence of Blended Learning study toward physics concept achievement and 2) there is influence of blended learning study toward physics reasoning.In addition, blended learning study can increase physics concept achievement and reasoning. Blended learning trains the students to be independent and active, and the procces of teaching and learning can be effective and efficient.


Keywords


blended learning; physics concept achievement; physics reasoning.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bantala, A.P. 2010. Penerapan E-Learning (Learning Management System) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kognitif Peserta Diklat Teknik Jaringan Komputer Dasar di PPPPTK Bmti Bandung. Tesis Jurusan Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan UPI. Bandung: PPs UPI.

Bawaneh, S.S. 2011. The Effects Of Blended Learning Approach On Students’ Performance: Evidence From A Computerized Accounting Course. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business Vol. 1, Issue. 4, April 2011.p 43–50.

Capus, L., Curvat, F., Leclair, O. & Tourigny, N. 2006. A Web environment to encourage student to do exercise outside the classroom: A case study. Educational Technology & Society. vol 9(3).p 173-181

Chang, K.E., Sung, Y.T, & Hou, H.T. 2006. Web–based tools for designing and developing Teaching Materials for integration of information. Educational Technology & Society(Online), Vol 9(4). p 139-149

Demirci, N. 2007. A Study About Students’ Misconceptions in Force and Motion Concepts by Incorporating a Web–Assisted Physics Program.The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology–TOJET Vol 4.

Graham, C.R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2005). Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology I-V. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Inc.

Husni, A., Juanda, E.A. & Hamidah, I. 2010. Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Berbantuan Web Pada Materi Fluida Statis Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa SMA.Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika 2010. p 451-458.

Indrawati, S. 2007. Peningkatan kemampuan bernalar siswa didik melalui pembelajaran konstruktivistik. Jurnal pengembangan Manusia edisi 5.

Kayler, M & Weller, K. 2007. Pedagogy, Self-Assessment, and Online Discussion Groups. Educational Technology & Society. vol 10(1), p. 136-147.

Levenberg, A & Caspi, A. 2010. Comparing Perceived Formal and Informal Learning in Face-to-Face versus Online Environments. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects.

Liu, T.-C. 2005. Web-based Cognitive Apprenticeship Model for improving Pre-service Teachers’ Performances and Attitudes towards Instructional Planning: Design and Field Experiment. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (2), 136-149.

Mekhlafi, A.A. 2004. The internet and EFL Teaching: The Reaction of UAE secondary School English Language Teacher. Journal of language and learning vol.2. p 88 - 113

Melton, B., Helen.G & Joanne C.F. 2009. Achievement and Satisfaction in Blended Learning versus Traditional General Health Course Designs. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. p 1-13

Matusov, E., Hayes, R.,& Pluta, M. J. 2005. Using discussion webs to Develop an Academic Community of Learners. Educational Technology & Society, 8 (2), 16-39.

Mujiyanto. 2012. Pengaruh Model Blended Learning terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Ditinjau dari Penalaran Formal Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Balikpapan. Thesis tidak diterbitkan, Malang: PPs UM.

Munawar, D.H,2011. Efektivitas Model Blended Learning Dengan Moodle Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika..Tesis Jurusan Pengembangan Kurikulum UPI Bandung. Bandung: PPs UPI.

Rahayu, E.S., & Nuryata, I.M. 2010. Pembelajaran Masa Kini. Jakarta: Sekarmita Training publishing.

Rosenberg, M.J. 2001. E-Learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. McGraw-Hill Professional

Riyana, C. 2010. Peningkatan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Melalui Penerapan Model Education Centre Of Teacher Interactive Virual(Educative)”. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Vol. 11 No. 1 April 2010.

Stepp-G.J. 2002. Student Perceptions on Language Learning in a Technological Environment: Implications for the New Millennium. Language Learning and Technology, 6(1), p. 165-180.

Suhendi. 2009. Implementasi E-Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Konsep dan Memperbaiki Sikap Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan. Tesis Jurusan Pendidikan IPA UPI Bandung. Bandung: PPs UPI.

Sukmadinata, N.S. 2010. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Toplak, M.E., Liu, E., Macpherson, R., Toneatto, T., and Stanovich, K.E. 2007. The Reasoning Skill and Thinking Dispositions of Problem Gamblers: A Dual-Process Taxonomy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 20: p. 103-124

Welsh, E. T., Wanberg, C. R., Brown, K. G., & Simmering, M. J. (2003). E-learning: Emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), p. 245-258.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v9i1.2582

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licensep-ISSN 1693-1246 e-ISSN 2355-3812