Email this article Prespektif Gender terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Mahasiswa pada Blended Learning berbantu Google Classrooms
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji kemampuan berpikir kreatif dilihat dari perbedaan gender pada Blended Learning berbantu Google Classrooms (BL-GC). Penelitian mix methods dilakukan dengan strategi concurrent embedded dimana subjek penelitian dipilih dengan teknik purpose sampling sehingga diperoleh 5 mahasiswa laki-laki dan 5 mahasiswa perempuan. Untuk meninjau kemampuan berpikir kreatif digunakan tes dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi BL-GC efektif terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif tanpa melihat perbedaan gender. Hal tersebut diperoleh berdasarkan hasil temuan secara kualiatatif dan kuantitatif yang menyebutkan bahwa kemampuan berpikir kreatif, peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif, dan ketercapaian indikator kemampuan berpikir kreatif tidak berbeda secara signifikan. Temuan lain menunjukkan bahwa kefasihan merupakan langkah awal dari kemampuan berpikir kreatif, sehingga jika ingin mengembangkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif, maka langkah awalnya adalah mengembangkan kefasihan siswa.
The aim of this study was to examine creative thinking skills viewed by gender differences in Blended Learning with Google Classrooms assisted (BL-GC). The mix methods research was carried out with a concurrent embedded strategy. The research subjects consist of 5 male and 5 female students. To review differences in creative thinking skills, tests and interviews are used. The results showed that the implementation of BL-GC was effective on creative thinking skills regardless of gender. This was obtained based on the qualitative and quantitative findings which stated that creative thinking skills, gain creative thinking skills, and the achievement of creative thinking skills’s indicators did not differ significantly. Other findings show that fluency is the first step in the ability to think creatively, so that if you want to develop creative thinking skills, the first step is to develop student fluency.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Afianty, O., R. Manogu & M. Marthaulina. (2018). A Comparison of Gender Differences Toward Mathematics’Cognitive Learning Outcomes in A Middle School. Journal of Holistic Mathematics Education, 1(2), 60-68.
Akgul, S. & Kahveci, N. G. (2016). A Study on the Development of a Mathematics Creativity Scale. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 52: 57-76.
Ardiansyah, A.S. & A.D. Sunaringtyas. (2016). Identifikasi Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah tipe Multiple Solution Task. PRISMA, 268-279
Ardila, A., M. Rosselli, E. Matute & O. Inozemtseva. (2011). Gender Differences in Cognitive Development. Development Psychology¸ 47(4), 984-990.
Benešová, A. & J. Tupa. (2017). Requirements for Education and Qualification of People in Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11: 2195-2202.
Boelens, R., B. De Wever & M. Voet. (2017). Four Key Challenges to the Design of Blended Learning: A Systematic Literature Review. Educational Research Review, 22, 1-18.
Candra, R. A., A. T. Prasetya, & R. Hartati. 2019. Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta Didik melalui Penerapan Blended Project-Based Learning. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(2), 2437-2446.
Cejka, M. A. & A. H. Eagly. (1999). Gender-stereotypic Images of Occupations Correspond to The Sex Segregation of Employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(4), 413-423.
Fatah, A., D. Suryadi, J. Sabandar, & Turmudi. (2016). Open-Ended Approach: An Effort in Cultivating Students’ Mathematical Creativity Thinking Ability and Self-Esteem in Mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 9-18.
Garrison, D. R. & H. Kanuka. (2004). Blended Learning: Uncovering Its Transformative Potential in Higher Education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95-105.
Hecklau, F., M. Galeitzke, S. Flachs & H. Kohl. (2016). Holistic Approach for Human Resource Management in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 54, 1-6.
Kadir, Lucyana, & G. Satriawati. (2017). The Implementation of Open-Inquiry Approach to Improve Student’s Learning Activities, Responses, and Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills. Journal on Mathematics Education. 8(1), 103-114.
Kanematsu, H., & D. M. Barry. (2016). STEM and ICT Education in Intelligent Environments. London: Springer International Publishing Switzerland
Komara, A. & A. Yulianto. (2019). Understanding of Principal Accounting Subject Based on Gender and Mathematics Ability. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 306, 218-222.
Leder, G. C. (2019). Gender and Mathematics: An Overview†in Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education (pp. 289-308). Springer, Cham
Levav-Waynberg, A. & R. Leikin. (2012). Using Multiple Solution Tasks for the Evaluation of Students’ Problem-Solving Performance in Geometry. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education. 12(4), 311-333.
Levenson, E. (2013). Tasks that may Occasion Mathematical Creativity: Teachers’ Choices. J Math Teacher Educ, 16, 269-291.
Ma’ruf, A. S., W. Wahyu, & W. Sopandi. (2020). Colloidal Learning Design using Radec Model with Stem Approach Based Google Classroom to Develop Student Creativity. Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(4), 758-765.
Malik, A. (2019). Creating Competitive Advantage through Source Basic Capital Strategic Humanity in the Industrial Age 4.0. International Research Journal of Advanced Engineering and Science, 4(1), 209-215.
Nida, N. K., B. Usodo, & D. R. S. Saputro. (2020). The blended learning with Whatsapp media on Mathematics creative thinking skills and math anxiety. Journal of Educational and Learning. 14(2), 307-314.
Novita, R. & M. Putra. (2016). Using Task Like PISA’s Problem to Support Student’s Creativity in Mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education. 7(1), 31-42.
Prifti, L., M. Knige, H. Kienegger & H. Kremar. (2017). A Competency Model for â€Industrie 4.0†Employees. in Leimeister, J.M.; Brenner, W. (Hrsg.): Proceedings der 13. Internationalen Tagung Wirtschafts informatik (WI 2017), St. Gallen, S. 46-60.
Reilly, D., D. L. Neumann & G. Andrews. (2017). Investigating Gender Differences in Mathematics and Science: Results from the 2011 Trends in Mathematics and Science Survey. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 25-50.
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering Creativity through Instruction Rich in Mathematical Problem Solving and Thinking in Problem Posing. ZDM, 29(3), 75-80.
Sudarsana, I.K., I.B.M.A. Putra, I.N.T. Astawa, & I. W.L. Yogantara. (2019). The Use of Google Classroom in the Learning Process. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1175: 1-5.
Susilo, H., Ibrohim, & Suwono, H. (2017). Pengembangan Kapabilitas Peserta Didik Melalui Belajar Berbasis Kehidupan Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi (pp. 1–20). Malang:
DRPM Ditjen Penguatan Risbang, Kemristekdikti.
Sya’roni, A.R., P. A. Inawati, E. Guswanti, Susanto & Hobri. 2020.†Students’ creative thinking skill in the flipped classroom blended learning of mathematics based on lesson study for learning communityâ€. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1563(2020): 012046
Wahyudi, W., Waluya, B., Suyitno, H., & Isnarto, I. (2019). The Use Of 3CM (Cool-Critical-Creative-Meaningful) Model In Blended Learning To Improve Creative Thinking Ability In Solving Mathematics Problem. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 5(1), 26-38.
Yazgan-Sag, G. & E. Emre-Akdogan. (2016). Creativity from Two Perspectives: Prospective Mathematics Teachers and Mathematician. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (12), 25-40.
Yustina, W. Syafii, & R.Vebrianto. (2020). The Effects of Blended Learning and Project-Basedlearning on Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Creative Thinking through Online Learning in the Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 408-420.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
