Email this article Komparasi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah pada Pembelajaran PBL dan RME dalam Setting INNOMATTS
Abstract
Abstrak
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kesesuaian proses pembelajaran dengan RPP yang dibuat guru, apakah terdapat perbedaan serta manakah yang lebih baik antara pembela-jaran dengan pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) dan Problem Based Learn-ing (PBL) pada siswa kelas VII materi Pertidaksamaan Linear Satu Variabel. Pelaksanaan pembelajaran dilakukan dalam setting model pelatihan INNOMATTS dengan quasi experi-mental design. Data kemampuan pemecahan masalah dianalisis menggunakan uji proporsi dan uji beda rata-rata. Hasil yang diperoleh yakni terdapat kesesuaian langkah-langkah setiap pendekatan yang digunakan dengan RPP yang dibuat guru. Berdasarkan uji proporsi, diper-oleh lebih dari 85 % siswa kedua kelas eksperimen mencapai nilai ketuntasan belajar indivi-du, yaitu 70. Selain itu, diperoleh adanya perbedaan hasil kemampuan pemecahan masalah antar kedua kelas eksperimen dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa kelas eksperimen II le-bih baik daripada siswa kelas eksperimen I.
Kata Kunci: RME; Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah; Komparasi; INNOMATTS; PBL.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was determining the conformance between the steps of each ap-proach used towards contained suitability of teacher’s lesson plans, whether there is a difference and which is better between learning approaches of Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) and Problem Based Learning (PBL) in grade VII with One Variable Linear Inequalities material can achieve mastery learning. The implementation of the learning is done in the setting of the INNOMATTS training model with quasi experimental design. The problem solving data is analyzed by proportion test and independent t test. The test results was obtained that there is conformance between the steps of each approach used towards contained suitability of teacher’s lesson plans. Basec on proportion test, the result was more than 85% of students in each experiment class achieved mastery learning with the passing grade is 70. From the t test, was showed that there is difference of average similarity of the both classes and 2nd experiment class was better than the 1st experiment class.
Keywords: Comparation; RME; PBL; Problem Solving Ability; INNOMATTS
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akınoğlu, O. dan Tandoğan, R.Ö. 2007. The Effects of Problem-Based Ac-tive Learning in Science Education on Students’ Academic Achieve-ment, Attitude and Concept Learn-ing, artikel dalam Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, Vol. 3(1), pp. 71-81.
Anni, C.T., dkk. 2005. Psikologi Belajar. Semarang: UPT UNNES Press.
Arsyad, A. 2011. Media Pembelajaran. Ja-karta: Raja Grafindo.
Asikin, M.; Junaedi, I.; dan Cahyono, A.N. 2013. Pengembangan Pelatihan INN-OMATTS (Innovative Mathematics Teaching Study) untuk Meningkat-kan Kompetensi dan Karakter Guru Matematika. (Laporan Penelitian). Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat. Ditjen Dikti. Dep-diknas.
Haris, D.N. dan Sass, T.R. 2008. Teacher Training, Teacher Quality, and Stu-dent Achievement. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research, Work Paper 3.
Hudojo, H. 2005. Pengembangan Kuriku-lum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Surabaya: UM Press.
Lasati, D. 2006. Efektifitas Pendekatan Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) pada Pembelajaran Persama-an Garis Lurus Siswa SMP Nasional KPS Balikpapan, artikel dalam Jur-nal Pendidikan Inovatif ,Vol. 1(2), pp. 34-40.
McGraner, K.L.; Amanda, V.; dan Lynn, H. 2011. Preparation of Effective Teachers in Mathematics. National Comprehensivee Center for Tea-ching Quality, artikel dalam TQ Connection Issue Paper, Special Vo-lume.
MacMath, S., et all. 2009. Problem-Based Learning in Mathematics A Tool for Developing Students’ Conceptual Knowledge. What Works?, artikel dalam Research Monograph #22.
NCTM. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Amerika: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
OECD. 2012. PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with they know.
Permendiknas Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 ten-tang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendi-dikan Dasar dan Menengah. 2006.
Saad, N.S. dan Ghani, S.A. 2008. Teach-ing Mathematics in Secondary Schools: Theories and Practices. Pe-rak: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Savin, M.B. 2000. Problem Based Learn-ing in Higher Education: Untold Sto-ries. Amerika: SRHE and Open Uni-versity Press.
Sudjana, N. dan Rivai, A. 2005. Media Pengajaran. Bandung: Percetakan Sinar Baru Algesindo Offset Ban-dung
Suyatno. 2009. Menjelajah Pembelajaran Inovatif. Sidoarjo: Masmedia Buana Pustaka.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 2003. Jakarta: Depdiknas
Utecht, J.R. 2003. Problem-Based Learn-ing in the Student Centered Class-room.
Xie, X. 2004. The Cultivation of Problem-solving and Reason in NCTM and Chinese National Standards, artikel dalam International Journal for Ma-thematics Teaching and Learning, Vol. 5(2), pp. 105-112. Nanjing: School of Education Nanjing Normal University. ISSN 1473 – 0111.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
