Email this article DGS-Based Modules: Difficulty Aspects of Studying Geometry at University Level
Abstract
This study aims to ensure that geometry is the most difficult subject to understand, aspects of the difficulty of learning geometry for students, and suggestions for reducing difficulties. This study uses an exploratory mixed methods design. Students of mathematics education teacher candidates in semesters 3-7 as research subjects were selected by purposive sampling. The data collected in this study used a questionnaire technique, interviews, and the value of learning outcomes for the last 4 years. The results showed that geometry is the most difficult subject, the external learning difficulties factor is dominated by the aspects of the material and learning methods. In addition, references, media, and online learning are also discussed factors. Meanwhile, students' learning difficulties internally from the aspect of motivation and intelligence. One solution suggested to educators is to take advantage of the collaboration of DGS with the Geometry module in learning in dealing with learning difficulties.
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memastikan bahwa geometri merupakan matakuliah yang paling sulit dipahami, aspek kesulitan belajar geometri pada mahasiswa dan saran untuk mengurangi kesulitan. Penelitian ini menggunakan Eksploratory mixed methods design. Mahasiswa calon guru pendidikan matematika semester 3-7 sebagai subjek penelitian dipilih dengan teknik purposive sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik angket, wawancara dan nilai hasil belajar selama 4 tahun terakhir. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa geometri merupakan matakuliah paling sulit, faktor kesulitan belajar secara eksternal didominasi dari aspek materi dan metode pembelajaran. Selain itu, referensi atau bahan ajar, media dan pembelajaran secara daring juga menjadi factor yang dibahas. Sedangkan kesulitan belajar mahasiswa secara internal dari aspek motivasi dan intelegensi atau kemampuan keruangan. Salah satu solusi yang disarankan kepada pendidik adalah memanfaatkan DGS yang dikolaborasikan dengan Modul Geometri dalam pembelajaran untuk menangani masalah kesulitan belajar.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdussakir. (2013). Penggunaan Komputer untuk Pembelajaran Matematika. Madrasah, 5(1), 117–133.
Aden, C. (2011). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran dan Komunikasi Matematik Melalui Model Think-Pair-Share Berbantuan Geometer’s Sketchpad [UPI]. http://repository.upi.edu/id/eprint/9196
Alghadari, F., Herman, T., & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Factors Affecting Senior High School Students to Solve Three-Dimensional Geometry Problems. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0590. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8234
Ayuningrum, L., Kusuma, A. P., & Rahmawati, N. K. (2019). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Pemahaman Belajar serta Penyelesaian Masalah Ruang Dimensi Tiga. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 5(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v5i1.5277
Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the Van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 31–48.
Chipangura, A., & Aldridge, J. (2019). Multimedia : A Means of Improving Students’ Engagement in Mathematics Classrooms? International Journal For Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 20(2), 193–211.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: The case of geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9173-0
Creswell, J. W, Plano Clark, V..L, Gutmann, M., & Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & D. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in Social and behavioral research. Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitatif research (Third-Pe). Pearson Education Inc.
Crowley, M. L. (1987). The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought. Learning and Teaching Geometry, K-12, 1–16.
Daryanto. (2013). Menyusun Modul: bahan ajar untuk persiapan guru dalam mengajar. Gava Media.
Erma suryani, Y. (2010). Kesulitan belajar. Magistra, 73(73), 33–47.
Ganal, N. N., & Guiab, M. R. (2014). Problems and difficulties encountered by students towards mastering learning competencies in mathematics. Researchers World, 5(4), 25.
Gazali, R. Y. (2016). Development of mathematics teaching materials for junior high school students based on Ausubel learning theory. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 182.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V.J., & Graham, W. E. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed method evaluation design. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274.
Harwell, J. M. (2000). Information & Materials for LD. The Center of Applied Research in Education.
Hasibuan, E. K. (2018). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Siswa Pada Pokok Bahasan Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar Di Smp Negeri 12 Bandung. AXIOM : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Matematika, 7(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.30821/axiom.v7i1.1766
Henle, M. (1969). Modern Geometries The Analytic Approach. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hohenwarter, M., & Hohenwarter, M. (2002). GeoGebra. In Available on-line at http://www. geogebra. org/cms/en.
Isharyadi, R., & Ario, M. (2018). Pengembangan Modul Berbantuan Geogebra Pada Perkuliahan Geometri Transformasi. Guru Tua : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31970/gurutua.v1i1.2
Isman, M. N. (2016). Pemanfaatan Program Geogebra Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. In Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika (Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 10–19). Delta-Pi: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika.
Istikomah, Endang & Herlina, S. (2019). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis IT Di Prodi Matematika FKIP UIR.
Istikomah, E. (2019). The relationship between conceptual understanding and student learning outcomes through the use of geometers Sketchpad software. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042070
Istikomah, Endang &, & Mohamad, N. . (2013). Kesan Penggunaan Perisian Geometer ’ S Sketchpad. Pendidikan Matematik, 1(2), 1–13.
Istikomah, Endang, & Herlina, S. (2020). ICT-Based Mathematics Learning Module: Students’ Respones in Learning Process. Jurnal PAJAR (Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran), 4(3), 2614–1337. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v4i2.7992
Jelatu, S., Sariyasa, & Ardana, I. M. (2018). Effect of GeoGebra - Aided REACT Strategy on Understanding of Geometry Concepts. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 325–336.
Juandi, D, Kusumah, Y, S., Tamur, M., & Perbowo, K, S & Wijaya, T, T. (2021). A meta-analysis of Geogebra software decade of assisted mathematics learning: what to learn and where to go? Heliyon, 7(5), e06953. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06953
Juandi, D, & Priatna, N. (2018). Discovery learning model with geogebra assisted for improvement mathematical visual thinking ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 12209.
Juandi, Dadang, Kusumah, Y., Tamur, M., Perbowo, K., Siagian, M., Sulastri, R., & Negara, H. (2021). The effectiveness of dynamic geometry software applications in learning mathematics: a meta-analysis study. 15(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i02.18853
Kirk, S.A, & Gallagher, J. J. (1986). Educating Exceptional Children 5th ed. Houghton Mifflin Company.
Ma’arif, S. (2016). Bahan Ajar Pembuktian Geometri Menggunakan Model Guided Discovery Learning dengan Strategi Self Explanation. In Bahan Ajar (pp. 1–29). Prodi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka.
Ma’rufi, M., Fabrika Pasandaran, R., & Yogi, A. (2018). Pemahaman konsep geometri mahasiswa berdasarkan gaya kognitif mahasiswa. Pemahaman Konsep Geometri Mahasiswa Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Mahasiswa, 1(2), 56–67.
Maarif, S; Wahyudin; Noto, M, S; Hidayat, W.; & Mulyono, H. (2018). Geometry exploration activities assisted with dynamic geometry software (Dgs) in a teacher education classroom. Infinity Journal, 7(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v7i2.p133-146
Mardati, A. (2017). Pengembangan Modul Matematika Dengan Pendekatan Kontekstual Pada Materi Bangun Datar Untuk Mahasiswa Pgsd Uad. JURNAL JPSD (Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar), 3(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.26555/jpsd.v3i2.a7246
Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco. CA: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/doi: 10.12691/rpbs-2-1-4.
Muhtadi, D., Kartasasmita, B. G., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). The Integration of technology in teaching mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943(1), 12020.
Nopiyani, D., Turmudi, T., & Prabawanto, S. (2016). Penerapan pembelajaran matematika realistik berbantuan geogebra untuk meningkatkan kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa SMP. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 45–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v5i2.259
Novita, R., Prahmana, C. I., & Fajri, N. P., & M. (2018). Penyebab kesulitan belajar geometri dimensi tiga. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.16836
Nur’aini, I. L., Harahap, E., Badruzzaman, F. H., & Darmawan, D. (2017). Pembelajaran Matematika Geometri Secara Realistis Dengan GeoGebra. Matematika, 16(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.29313/jmtm.v16i2.3900
Nur, F. (2017). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Matematika Kelas VII SMP Berdasarkan Model Pembelajaran Kolb-Knisley Berbantuan Geogebra sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Higher-Order Thinking Skill dan Apresiasi Siswa Terhadap Matematika. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 96–109.
Nurzhanov, C., Pidlisnyuk, V., Naizabayeva, L., & Satymbekov, M. (2021). World Journal on Educational Technology : Current Issues technology during 2016 – 2020 : Results of a content analysis. 13(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i2.5695
Owon, R. A. S. (2017). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Menulis Sastra Indonesia di SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran, 3(1), 528–541.
Özçakir, B., & Cakiroglu, E. (2019). Effects of Dynamic Geometry Activities on Seventh Graders ’ Learning on Area of Quadrilaterals. International Journal For Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 20(2), 257–271.
Pangesti, F. T. P., & Retnowati, E. (2017). Learning Materials for Junior High School Based on Cognitive Load Theory With Regard to Student ’ s Achievement. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 33–46.
Prastowo, A. (2012). Panduan Kreatif Membuat Bahan Ajar Inovatif. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Purnomo, M. E. R., & Machromah, I. U. (2017). Solid Geometry Learning: Student Errors in Solving Solid Geometry Problems at University Level. Jurnal Daya Matematis, 5(3), 408–418.
Retnawati, H. Harlinwibowo, J & Sulytianingsih, E. (2017). Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Item Geometri Ujian Nasional. Jurnal Internasional Tentang Tren Baru Dalam Pendidikan Dan Implikasinya, 8(4).
Saadati, F., Tarmizi, R. A., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2014). Utilization of Information and Communication Technologies in Mathematics Learning. Indonesian Mathematical Society Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(2), 138–147.
Safrina, K., Ikhsan, M., & Ahmad, A. (2014). Peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah geometri melalui pembelajaran kooperatif berbasis teori van hiele. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 1(1).
Satriawan, & Wutsqa, D. (2013). Keefektifan Pembelajaran dengan sumber belajar interaktif berbasis komputer ditinjau dari motivasi dan prestasi belajar mathematica efektivitas pembelajaran dengan sumber belajar interaktif berbasis komputer dalam hal motivasi dan matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8, 193–203.
Setyawan, F., Kristanto, Y. D., & Ishartono, N. (2018). Preparing In-Service Teacher Using Dynamic Geometry Software. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.30), 367. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.30.22317
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case research. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/doi: 10.2307/329758.
Sungkono, D. (2003). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. FIP UNY.
Syahrir, S., Kusnadin, K., & Nurhayati, N. (2013). Analisis Kesulitan Pemahaman Konsep Dan Prinsip Materi Pokok Dimensi Tiga Siswa Kelas Xi Smk Keperawatan Yahya Bima. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 1(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v1i1.522
Tamur, M., Juandi, D., & Kusumah, Y. S. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Application of Mathematical Software in Indonesia; A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 867–884. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13453a
Wardani, T. G. A. . (1991). “Diagnosis Kesulitan Belajar dan Perbaikan Belajar”, dalam materi pokok Psikologi Pendidikan. Program Penyetaraan D-II Guru Pendidikan Agama iSlam SD dan MI Depag. Ditjen Binbaga Islam dan Universitas Terbuka.
Wijaya, A., Retnawati, H., Setyaningrum, W., & Aoyama, K. (2019). Diagnosing Students’ Learning Difficulties in the Eyes of Indonesian Mathematics Teachers. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 357–364. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.3.7798.357-364
Yeni, E. M. (2011). Utilization of Manipulative Objects to Improve Understanding of Geometry Concepts and Observation Ability of Class V Elementary School Students. Edisi Khusus, 1, 63–75.
Yin, R. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods (2rd ed.). Thousand Oaks,. CA: Sage.
Yulianti, Buchori, A., & Murtianto, Y. H. (2017). Pengembangan Media Presentasi Visual dengan Pendekatan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di SMP. Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 2(2), 231–242.
Zetriuslita; Nofriyandi;, & Istikomah, E. (2021). Improving Students ’ Mathematics Communication Ability Through Geogebra Peningkatan Kemampuan Komunikasi. 10(2). https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v10vi2i.1266
Zetriuslita, Nofriyandi, & Istikomah, E. (2021). The Increasing Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulated through GeoGebra Based Teaching reviewed from Initial Mathematical Ability (IMA) Level. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14135A
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
