Email this article Analysis of Creative Thinking and Curiosity in X Class Students
Abstract
In the learning, because the learning time isn’t sufficient to convey material, teacher who concerned learning results than learning process made students just imitating teachers’ problem solving. They aren’t trained to solve new problems. This research aims, (1) finds out the mathematics creatie thinking ability of high school students; (2) finds out the characters of the students’ curiosity; (3) finds out the influence of curiosity on students’ creative thinking ability. This research method and design is a quantitative and comparison of approaches. The research is conducted at one of the state high schools in Semarang. The research population sample in a row is all students of classes of X MIPA and X MIPA 3. This population is given a creative thinking ability test. This sample is given a curiosity questionnaire. Creative thinking ability mean of the ten classes of X MIPA is 69,4. Curiosity mean of X MIPA 3 is 169,3. Therefore, (1) students’ mathematics creative thinking ability is not optimal; (2) the character of the students’ curiosity is not optimal; (3) curiosity positively affects creative thinking ability. That resulted in teacher developing learning media and processes and students’ curiosity to their students’ creative thinking ability.
Dalam pembelajaran, karena waktu pembelajaran tidak mencukupi untuk menyampaikan materi, guru mengutamakan hasil dari pada proses pembelajaran mengakibatkan siswa meniru proses pemecahan masalah dari guru dan tidak terlatih menyelesaikan masalah baru. Tujuan penelitian, (1) mengetahui kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa SMA; (2) mengetahui karakter rasa ingin tahu siswa; (3) mengetahui pengaruh karakter rasa ingin tahu terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa. Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian kuantitatif. Desain penelitian adalah comparison of approaches. Penelitian awal dilaksanakan di salah satu SMA Negeri di Semarang. Populasi dan sampel penelitian berturut-turut adalah seluruh siswa kelas X MIPA dan X MIPA 3. Populasi diberikan tes kemampuan berpikir kreatif. Sampel diberikan angket curiosity. Rata-rata kemampuan berpikir kreatif dari 10 kelas X MIPA adalah 69,4. Rata-rata rasa ingin tahu siswa kelas X MIPA 3 adalah 169,3. Kesimpulannya (1) kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa belum optimal dalam pembelajaran, karena guru menyusun pembelajaran matematika belum terfokus pada kemampuan berpikir kreatif; (2) karakter rasa ingin tahu siswa belum optimal; dan (3) karakter rasa ingin tahu berpengaruh positif terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif. Hasil penelitian mengakibatkan guru mengembangkan curiosity dan media serta proses pembelajaran siswa untuk menumbuhkan kemamampuan berpikir kreatif mereka.
Keywords
References
Ainley, M. (2019). Curiosity and Interest: Emergence and Divergence. Educational Psychology Review, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21376
Aljarrah, A. (2020). Describing collective creative acts in a mathematical problem-solving environment. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 60(September), 100819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100819
Ayllon, M., Gomez, I., & Ballesta-Claver, J. (2016). Mathematical Thinking and Creativity Through Mathematical Problem Posing and Solving. Propósitos y Representaciones, 4(1), 169–218. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/ pyr2016.v4n1.89
Behnamnia, N., Kamsin, A., Akmar, M., & Ismail, B. (2020). The landscape of research on the use of digital game-based learning apps to nurture creativity among young children: A review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(February), 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100666
Berestova, A., Ermakov, D., Aitbayeva, A., Gromov, E., & Vanina, E. (2021). Social networks to improve the creative thinking of students: How does it works? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100912
Bicer, A., Lee, Y., Perihan, C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2020). Considering mathematical creative self-efficacy with problem posing as a measure of mathematical creativity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 457–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09995-8
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., … Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Carbonell-Carrera, C., Saorin, J. L., Melian-Diaz, D., & de la Torre-Cantero, J. (2019). Enhancing creative thinking in STEM with 3D CAD modelling. Sustainability, 11(21), 6036. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216036
Ertando, A., Prayitno, B. A., & Harlita. (2019). Implementation of Guided Inquiry Learning Model on the Topic of Invertebrate To Enhance Student. Unnes Science Education Journal, 8(2), 208–215.
Fiallo, J., & Gutiérrez, A. (2017). Analysis of the cognitive unity or rupture between conjecture and proof when learning to prove on a grade 10 trigonometry course. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9755-6
Fitrianawati, M., Sintawati, M., Marsigit, & Retnowati, E. (2020). Analysis Toward Relationship Between Mathematical Literacy and Creative Thinking Abilities of Students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032104
Gerhana, M. T. C., Mardiyana, M., & Pramudya, I. (2017). The Effectiveness of Project Based Learning in Trigonometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012027
Goldspink, S., & Engward, H. (2019). Curiosity and Self-Connected Learning: Re-Centring The ‘I’in Technology-Assisted Learning. Employability via Higher Education: Sustainability as Scholarship, 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26342-3
Gorlewicz, J. L., & Jayaram, S. (2019). Instilling Curiosity, Connections , and Creating Value in Entrepreneurial Minded Engineering : Concepts for a Course Sequence in Dynamics and Controls. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 23–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419879469
Gross, M. E., Zedelius, C. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2020). Cultivating an understanding of curiosity as a seed for creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.015
Gruber, M. J., & Ranganath, C. (2019). How Curiosity Enhances Hippocampus-Dependent Memory: The Prediction, Appraisal, Curiosity, and Exploration (PACE) Framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(12), 1014–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.10.003
Hadar, L. L., & Tirosh, M. (2019). Creative thinking in mathematics curriculum: An analytic. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33(July), 100585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100585
Hagtvedt, L. P., Dossinger, K., Harrison, S. H., & Huang, L. (2019). Curiosity Made The Cat More Creative: Specific Curiosity as A Driver of Creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150(January 2017), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.10.007
Hidayah, I., Isnarto, Masrukan, Asikin, M., & Margunani. (2021). Quality Management of Mathematics Manipulative Products to Support Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 537–554.
Hu, R., Wu, Y. Y., & Shieh, C. J. (2016). Effects of Virtual Reality Integrated Creative Thinking Instruction on Students’ Creative Thinking Abilities. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1226a
Hussin, A. A. (2018). Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas For Teaching. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(3), 92-98. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.3p.92
Isnani, Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, & Wardono. (2020). Analysis of Mathematical Creativity in Mathematics Learning is Open Ended. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1511(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1511/1/012102
Kamber, D., & Takaci, D. (2018). On problematic aspects in learning trigonometry. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1357846
Kartika, Y., Wahyuni, R., Sinaga, B., & Rajagukguk, J. (2019). Improving Math Creative Thinking Ability by using Math Adventure Educational Game as an Interactive Media. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1179(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012078
Kidd, C., & Hayden, B. Y. (2015). The Psychology and Neuroscience of Curiosity. Neuron, 88(3): 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.010
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended Learning Effectiveness: The Relationship Between Student Characteristics, Design Features and Outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4
Lamnina, M., & Chase, C. C. (2019). Developing A Thirst for Knowledge: How Uncertainty in The Classroom Influences Curiosity, Affect, Learning, and Transfer. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59(June), 101785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101785
Leo, I. Di, Muis, K. R., Singh, C. A., & Psaradellis, C. (2019). Curiosity… Confusion? Frustration! The role and sequencing of emotions during mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 58(March), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.03.001
Mefoh, P. C., Nwoke, M. B., Chukwuorji, J. B. C., & Chijioke, A. O. (2017). Effect of cognitive style and gender on adolescents’ problem solving ability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.03.002
Mensah, F. S. (2017). Ghanaian Senior High School Students’ Error in Learning of Trigonometry. International Journal Of Environmental & Science Education, 12(8), 1709–1717.
Mouromadhoni, K. R., Atun, S., & Nurohman, S. (2019). Students’ Curiosity Profile in Excretion System Topic Taught Using Authentic Inquiry Learning. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(3), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.7689
Mulyono, Rosayanti, S. M., & Kristiawan, R. (2020). Mathematics creative thinking ability based on student’s cognitive style by using Knisley learning models. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032015
Nurhayati, N., & Wahyuni, R. (2020). Penggunaan Model Discovery Learning Berbasis Media Interaktif Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Dalam Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al Qalasadi, 4(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.32505/qalasadi.v4i1.1748
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Puncreobutr, V. (2016). Education 4.0: New Challenge of Learning. St. Theresa Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(2), 92–97.
Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and Limitations of Qualitative and Quantitative Research Methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089
Raharja, S., Wibhawa, M. R., & Lukas, S. (2018). Mengukur Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa. POLYGLOT, Jurnal Ilmiah, 14(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.19166/pji.v14i2.832
Rahayu, C., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Hartono, Y. (2019). On Curiosity to Introduce Mathematics in Early Childhood. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1166(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1166/1/012032
Rahmantiwi, W. B., & Rosnawati, R. (2018). The Effect of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Toward Mathematics Communication Ability and Curiosity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012124
Rochmad, Agoestanto, A., & Kharis, M. (2018). Characteristic Of Critical And Creative Thinking Of Students Of Mathematics Education Study Program. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012076
Rochmad, Kharis, M., Agoestanto, A., & Zahid, M. Z. (2019). Algebraic Creative Thinking of Undergraduate Students of Mathematics Education Program. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1321(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/3/032005
Salido, A., Suryadi, D., Dasari, D., & Muhafidin, I. (2020). Mathematical reflective thinking strategy in problem-solving viewed by cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1469(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1469/1/012150
Saltis, M. N., Critchlow, C., & Smith, J. A. (2019). Teaching Through Sand: Creative Applications of Sandtray Within Constructivist Pedagogy. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 14(3), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2019.1624995
Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2020). Connections Between Curiosity, Flow and Creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 152(July 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109555
Silvia, P. J. (2017). Curiosity. In The science of interest. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55509-6
Siswono, T. Y. E. (2011). Level of Student’s Creative Thinking in Classroom Mathematics. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(7), 548–553.
Sugiman, Suyitno, H., & Walid. (2020). To Grow A Joyful Learning in SLB through A Manipulative Teaching Aid Based on Multi-Function Video. Journal of Physics, Conference Series PAPER, 1567(2), 022091. https,//doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/2/022091
Toptas, V. (2019). the Opinions of Primary School Teachers About Arousing Mathematical Curiosity in. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 4(10), 384–398. https,//doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.62
Tubb, A. L., Cropley, D. H., Marrone, R. L., Patston, T., & Kaufman, J. C. (2020). The development of mathematical creativity across high school, Increasing, decreasing, or both?. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35(February), 100634. https,//doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100634
Wade, S., & Kidd, C. (2019). The Role of Prior Knowledge and Curiosity in Learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 26(4), 1377–1387. https,//doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01598-6
Wahyudi, W., Waluya, S. B., Suyitno, H., & Isnarto, I. (2020). The Impact of 3CM Model within Blended Learning to Enhance Students’ Creative Thinking Ability. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(1), 32–46. https,//doi.org/10.3926/jotse.588
Wahyudi, Waluya, S., Suyitno, H., Isnarto, & Pramusita, S. M. (2019). Schemata in Creative Thinking to Solve Mathematical Problems About Geometry. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(11), 2444–2448. https,//doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071122
Wang, C., Fang, T., & Gu, Y. (2020). Learning Performance and Behavioral Patterns of Online Collaborative Learning, Impact of Cognitive Load and Affordances of Different Multimedia. Computers and Education, 143(5), 103683. https,//doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103683
Yang, D. C., & Sianturi, I. A. (2017). An Analysis of Singaporean versus Indonesian textbooks based on trigonometry content. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3829–3848. https,//doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00760a
Yaniawati, P., Kariadinata, R., Sari, N. M., Pramiarsih, E. E., & Mariani, M. (2020). Integration of e-learning for mathematics on resource-based learning, Increasing mathematical creative thinking and self-confidence. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(6), 60–78. https,//doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i06.11915
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
