Implementation Evaluation Authentic in Learning History Curriculum 2013 at SMA Negeri 1 Purwareja Klampok
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to 1) to know teachers' understanding of the authentic assessment; 2) know the application of authentic assessment that the teacher has conducted; 3) know teachers' problems in implementing authentic assessment; 4) know the efforts to overcome the obstacles in the implementation of authentic assessment. The method uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods to obtain the data using interviews, documentary studies, and observations. To test the validity of the data triangulation sources and techniques. Data analysis was performed using analytical models of interaction. The results of this study showed 1) teachers' understanding of authentic assessment of Curriculum in 2013 is still subjective based on personal knowledge; it does not line up with the theory; 2) on the authentic assessment process, teachers have prepared various assessments based on Curriculum 2013, but the implementation is not entirely by the planning on lesson plan; 3) the problems experienced were the number of techniques and instruments that should be implemented, the lack of facilities and infrastructure, and the government regulations were often capricious; 4) efforts that the teachers have conducted are trying every technique, moving classes to obtain adequate facilities and infrastructure, and also keeping in touch with other teachers and curriculum holders.
References
Bintari, N. A. A., & Sutama, M. P. (2015). Pengelolaan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013 Di SD Negeri Salatiga 06 (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
Cahyono, A. E. (2017). Evaluasi pelaksanaan authentic assessment berdasarkan kurikulum 2013 dalam pembelajaran ekonomi di SMA Islam Al-Hidayah Jember. EQUILIBRIUM: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi dan Pembelajarannya, 5(1), 1-13.
Daryanto, H. M. (2008). Evaluasi Pendidikan. PT Rineka Cipta.
Dasopang, M. D. (2017). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Fitrah: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman, 3(2), 333-352.
Gunawan, I. (2011). Evaluasi program pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(1).
Hadi, S. (2016). Pemeriksaan Keabsahan data penelitian kualitatif pada skripsi. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang, 22(1), 109874.
Hajaroh, S., & Adawiyah, R. (2018). Kesulitan guru dalam mengimplementasikan penilaian autentik. El Midad: Jurnal Jurusan PGMI, 10(2), 131-152.
Hosnan. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Konstekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Grafindo Indonesia.
Kunandar. (2015). Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013) Edisi Revisi. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Miftah, M. (2013). Fungsi, dan peran media pembelajaran sebagai upaya peningkatan kemampuan belajar siswa. Kwangsan: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(2), 95-105.
Moleong, L. J. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mulyadi, M. (2012). Riset desain dalam metodologi penelitian. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media, 16(1), 71-80.
Mulyasa, H.E. (2013). Pengembangan Dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nainggolan, V., Rondonuwu, S. A., & Waleleng, G. J. (2018). Peranan media sosial Instagram dalam interaksi sosial antar mahasiswa fakultas ilmu sosial dan politik UNSRAT Manado. ACTA Diurna Komunikasi, 7(4).
Nilamsari, N. (2014). Memahami studi dokumen dalam penelitian kualitatif. WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi, 13(2), 177-181.
Permendikbud Nomor 53 Tahun 2015 tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik dan Satuan Pendidikan pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.
Permendikbud Nomor 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan.
Pujiono, S. (2014). Kesiapan guru bahasa Indonesia SMP dalam implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Litera, 13(2).
Rufiana, I. S. (2016). Level kognitif soal pada buku teks matematika kurikulum 2013 kelas VII untuk pendidikan menengah. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 2(2), 13-22.
Safitri, D., & Oktaviana, M. (2017). Implementasi Penilaian Autentik Kurikulum 2013 (Studi Kasus Guru IPS di SMP Labschool Jakarta). Edukasi IPS, 1(1), 31-40.
Salamah, U. (2018). Penjaminan mutu penilaian pendidikan. EVALUASI: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 274-293.
Siregar, L. A. (2018). Penilaian Otentik dalam Kurikulum 2013. Al-Razi: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Kemasyarakatan, 18(2), 1-11.
Syafruddin, S. (2017). Implementasi metode diskusi terhadap peningkatan hasil belajar siswa. CIRCUIT: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 1(1).
Umasih, U. (2012). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Sejarah Pada Sma Negeri Di Dki Jakarta. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 22(2).
Zarkasyi, A. (2016). Konsep Pengembangan Program Unggulan di Lembaga Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Al-Makrifat, 1(1).
Copyright (c) 2019 Indonesian Journal of History Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
An author who publishes in the Jurnal Indonesian Journal of History Education agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
