Phonological Process of Word-Final Consonant Sounds in Indonesian Learners by Japanese Speakers (Case Study of Japanesia Online Course Students)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/chie.v12i2.12816Keywords:
generative phonology, distinctive features, consonant sounds, Indonesian learnerAbstract
This study aims to analyze the phonological processes and contributing factors affecting the pronunciation of final consonant sounds by native Japanese speakers learning Indonesian. The research employs the theory of generative transformational phonology, using distinctive features to address the research questions. A qualitative descriptive approach was adopted, utilizing data from the Japanesia course's online class videos on YouTube, collected through observation and note-taking techniques. The analysis identifies three main phonological processes in Japanese learners' pronunciation of Indonesian final consonants: sound substitution (e.g., [n] to [ŋ] and [l] to [r]), elision of [h], and addition of sounds such as [u] following [r] and [s], as well as aspirated [h] after [t] and [k]. These phonological adjustments reflect the absence of certain Indonesian sounds in Japanese, prompting learners to adapt pronunciations to their native phonological system. Furthermore, the Japanese language’s predominant open syllable structure (CVCV) generally excludes word-final consonants aside from nasals, contributing to these adaptations.
Downloads
References
Adnyani, K. E. K., Puspawati, N. W. N., & Suwastini, N. K. A. (2021). “Makam” nasi: Language interference of a Japanese young learner in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 54(3), 548–563. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v54i3.41023
Ainie, L. Z., & Andajani, K. (2023). Kesalahan Berbahasa Indonesia oleh Penutur Asing dalam Akun Youtube Tomohiro Yamashita. Disastra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.29300/disastra.v5i1.7419
Al-Hindadwi, F. H. (2018). The Basic Tenets of Generative Phonology. The International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE), 9(1), 7–16. www.iiste.org
Azella, A. N., & Rahman, N. I. Z. (2023). Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa dalam Bidang Fonologi pada Video Youtube Nihongo Mantappu. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 5(1), 5626–5633.
Azwardi. (2018). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. In R. Bahry (Ed.), Metode Penelitian. Syiah Kuala University Press.
Effendi. (2019). BAHASA INDONESIA OLEH YOUTUBER JEPANG ( STUDI KASUS : GENKI ). E-Journal Bapala, 5(2), 1–12.
Katamba, F. (1989). An introduction to phonology. In About Language. Longman. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024525.039
Kenstowicz, M., & Kisseberth, C. (1981). Generative Phonology: Description and Theory. Language, 57(2), 460. https://doi.org/10.2307/413703
Mariah Anggreni, Agus Subiyanto/ Chi’e: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Jepang Vol.12 (2) (2024)
Koizumi, T. (1993). Nihongo Kyooshi No Tame No Gengogaku Nyuumon. Taishuukan Shoten.
Li, Y. (2019). The Chinese Writing System in Asia An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Taylor & Francis.
Mahsun. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Rajawali Press.
Muslich, M. (2008). Fonologi bahasa indonesia. bumi aksara BP.
Nurfitriani, S., & Putra, D. K. (2021). Interferensi Fonologis Bahasa Jepang terhadap Bahasa Indonesia pada Pemelajar BIPA di PT Sakai Mulia Koken Indonesia. Jurnal Bahasa Indonesia Bagi Penutur Asing (JBIPA), 3(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.26499/jbipa.v3i1.3626
Prihatiningtyas, Apriliya Dwi, S. P. M. (2015). Pengaruh Sistem Fonologi Bahasa Pertama Terhadap Pembelajaran Bahasa Kedua: Studi Kasus Pada Penutur Bahasa Jepang. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 3(1).
Putrayasa, I. G. N. K., & Susandhika, I. G. N. M. (2022). Perbandingan Bunyi antara Bahasa Indonesia dengan Bahasa Jepang. Proceeding of Seminar Nasional Riset Linguistik Dan Pengajaran Bahasa (Senarilip Vi), October, 55–70.
Rachmawati Aliffia, Ik. I. (2022). Chi ’ e : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Jepang Pengaruh Bunyi Bahasa Jepang terhadap Penulisan Kosakata Berbahasa Indonesia. 10(1), 52–60.
Saskiya, R., & Tresnasari, N. (2022). Waseda Boys’ Phonological Interference of Indonesian Food Names In Nihongo Mantappu Vlogs. Izumi, 11(2), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.14710/izumi.11.2.208-215
Schane, S. A. (1973). Schane Generative Phonology-Prentice Hall College Div. In Bibliography (p. 123). PRENTICE-HALL,INC.
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Duta Wacana University Press.
Sutedi, D. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Linguistik Bahasa Jepang. HUMANIORA UTAMA PRESS.
Tjandra, S. (2004). Fonologi jepang. Depok: Universitas Indonesia.
Widodo, M., Putrawan, G. E., & Perdana, R. (2023). How Is a Foreign Language Pronounced? A Case Study of Indonesian as a Foreign Language Among Speakers of Other Languages. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(1), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1401.24
Yulianto, B. (2018). Teori dan Aplikasi Fonologi Generatif. Graniti.
Yusuf, S. (1998). Fonetik dan Fonologi. PT Gramedia.
Downloads
Article ID
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 mariah anggreni, Agus Subiyanto (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
License Terms
The copyright of the received article once accepted for publication shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles.
In developing strategy and setting priorities,Chie: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Jepang recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should always achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
Chie: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Jepang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
