Meikarta’s Delay Dilemma: A Legal Study on Apartment Handover and Consumer Harm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jal.v1i2.31081Keywords:
Apartment; Developer; Consumer; Protection; DelayAbstract
This article will discuss 'Legal Analysis of the Delay in Handover of Meikarta Apartment Units: Implications for Consumer Protection.' This research uses a qualitative research method that is descriptive in nature with a normative juridical approach. The results of this research indicate that the root cause of the delay in the handover of Meikarta apartment units lies in the developer's non-compliance with the administrative requirements before marketing the units through the pre-project selling system. The incompleteness of building permits, the unresolved status of land rights, and the unmet environmental impact analysis documents are the main factors causing delays in construction. According to applicable regulations, as long as these permits have not been obtained in full, the developer should not be allowed to enter into a Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB) with prospective consumers. Therefore, based on the actions taken by the developer, the Meikarta apartment developer is entitled to be responsible as a form of legal protection for consumers.
References
Auta, Budiarjo. “Bentuk Penyuluhan Hukum Notaris Terhadap Jual Beli Apartemen Sebagai Wujud Perlindungan Konsumen.” Jurnal Officium Notarium 2, no. 3 (2022): 449–56.
Christian Yogi Setyawan, Waluyo. “Kajian Yuridis Upaya Hukum Bagi Konsumen Atas Pembelian Unit Apartement Yang Tidak Menjalankan Prestasinya (Studi Kasus PPJB PT. Mahkota Semesta Utama Di Bekasi).” Kabilah: Journal of Social Community 9, no. 14 (2024): 567–77.
Evelyn Millechen, Rasji. “Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pengembang Properti Yang Dinyatakan Pailit Terhadap Pemenuhan Kewajiban Kepada Konsumen Ditinjau Dari Teori Kepastian Hukum.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 4 (2024): 10700–710.
Fauzan Aziman Alhamidy, Isis Ikhwansyah, Zainal Muttaqin. “Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Akibat Pencabutan Izin Mendirikan Bangunan Apartemen (Studi Kasus Di Kota Bandung).” Recital Review 2507, no. February (2020): 1–9.
I. M. Arjaya, & N. K. M. G. Paramita. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Berdasarkan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(2), 15–26.
Meliana, Meliana, Joni Emirzon, and Firman Muntaqo. “Perlindungan Hukum Developer Dan Konsumen Rumah Susun Dalam Perjanjian Dengan Sistem Pre Project Selling Di Indonesia.” Lex LATA 3, no. 1 (2022): 87–103.
Nanda, Ayu Husna, and Sulastri. “Pertanggungjawaban PT Mahkota Sentosa Utama Akibat Wanprestasi Dalam Jual Beli Apartemen Melalui Sistem Pre-Project Selling.” Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum 4, no. 3 (2023): 653–62.
Patrick Winson Salim, Clayment Claudio Jap, Margareth Trisya Adefinola Naru. “Pemenuhan Hak Konsumen Dalam Sengketa Perdata Lahan Meikarta.” Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika, 2020, 137–47.
Rahmat, Panca Basuki, Hanif Nur Widhiyanti, and Erna Anggraini. “Akibat Hukum Jual Beli Apartemen Sistem Pre Project Selling Yang Tidak Dibuat Dalam Akta Notaris.” Jurnal Suara Hukum 4, no. 2 (2023): 379–407.
Therik, Danish Ferdie, and Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom. “Perlindungan Pembeli Apartemen Pre Project Selling.” Binamulia Hukum 12, no. 2 (2024): 403–16.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
31081Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Joan Angelica Rossa, Ratu Syifa Junaedi Putri (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Indonesian Journal of Agrarian Law are made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). By submitting a manuscript to the journal, authors agree to the terms outlined below regarding the distribution, use, and sharing of their work.
