Reformulation of Commercial Court Authority Regulations Relation to the Arbitration Clause
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.vol5i1.2144Keywords:
Reformulation, Authority Arrangements, Commercial CourtAbstract
The issue of jurisdiction in dispute resolution within the Commercial Court arises when the contract designates an arbitration clause as the preferred mechanism for resolving disputes. In the contractual agreement between PT. Swadaya Graha and PT. Rayon Utama Makmur (RUM), the chosen forum for dispute resolution is stipulated to be the National Arbitration Board (BANI). However, concurrently, there is a proposal for dispute resolution within the Commercial Court framework concerning defaulted debt and receivable disputes in PKPU case number 45/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Smg. This has engendered a legal debate centring on the application of the "lex specialist derogat legi general" principle among the Arbitration Law, the Bankruptcy Law, and PKPU, with regard to the absolute jurisdiction of institutions authorized to examine, decide, and adjudicate incidents of defaulted debt and receivable disputes within the legal relationship between the PKPU Petitioner and the Respondent. The PKPU process is structured within a contract that includes an arbitration clause as the designated dispute resolution mechanism. Given the complications and hurdles posed by these issues, there is a pressing need for legal certainty in the future. Furthermore, there has been a conflict of norms between the Arbitration Law the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU, as evidenced in PKPU case number 45/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Smg. Hence, a reformulation of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU regulations is essential to harmonize them with evolving norms and address emerging issues. A vital aspect of this reformulation involves the potential removal or replacement of Article 303 of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU.
References
Alcolea, Lucas Clover. “The Rise of the International Commercial Court: A Threat to the Rule of Law?,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 13, no. 3 (2022): 413–42.
Ambarwati, Auliah, et al., “The Essence of the Principle of Good Faith in the Agreement For The Parties,” IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science 27, no. 8 (2022): 36–43.
Aritonang, Daniel Dianto, and Manlian Ronald A. Simanjuntak, “Analysis of important factors in choosing or using process alternative dispute resolution of construction project from contractor’s perspective (case study in XYZ Company, Ltd’s),” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1007, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1007/1/012084.
Baiquni, Muhammad Iqbal. “Arbitrators as a Legal Profession in The Alternative Role of Dispute Resolution in Indonesia,” Jurnal Humaya: Jurnal Hukum, Humaniora, Masyarakat, dan Budaya 2, no. 1 (2022): 12–20.
Barkatullah, Abdul Halim. "Budaya Hukum Masyarakat dalam Perspektif Sistem Hukum." Jurnal UKSW (2013): 1-18.
Budi, Kukuh Pramono. Implikasi Hukum Pengaturan Klausula Arbitrase Kaitannya Dengan Proses Kepailitan dan PKPU, (Surabaya: Program Studi Manajemen Hayam Wuruk Perbanas, n.d.).
Budiantoso, Bambang Medivit, et al. "Final Legal Certainty and Binding of Arbitration Awards in Business Dispute Settlement at the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI)." Hermeneutika: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 7, no. 2 (2023): 340-360.
Davison-Vecchione, Daniel. "Beyond the forms of faith: Pacta Sunt Servanda and loyalty." German Law Journal 16, no. 5 (2015): 1163-1190.
Devi, Ria Sintha, et al., “The Bankruptcy Legal Politics in Indonesia based on Justice Value,” Jurnal Akta 9, no. 1 (2022): 67-78.
Friedman, Lawrence M. The Legal Sistem : A Sosial Science Perspective. (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1975).
Fuady, Munir. Teori Teori Besar (Grand Theory) dalam Hukum. (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group, 2014).
Halim, Mustafa‘Afifi Ab, Shabrina Zata Amni, and Mufti Maulana. "Legal System in the Perspectives of HLA Hart and Lawrence M. Friedman." Peradaban Journal of Law and Society 2, no. 1 (2023): 51-61.
Hartini, Rahayu. Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepailitan di Indonesia (Dualisme Kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga & Lembaga Arbitrase) (Jakarta: Kencana, 2009).
Hasyim, A. Dardiri. "Extra-Judicial Dispute Resolution and the Realization of Justice in the Indonesia Legal System." Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum 55, no. 1 (2021): 1-24.
Hermawan, Bambang Eryanto, et al. "Simple Verification Principles in Bankruptcy Procedures in Commercial Court of Indonesia." International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 7, no. 5 (2020): 461-472.
Jayadi, Hendri. "Legal Certainty Implementation of Arbitration Decisions in Indonesia." Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution International Conference (ADRIC 2019). Atlantis Press, 2020.
Johan, Suwinto, Amad Sudiro, and Ariawan Gunadi, “What Could ASEAN Learn about Bankruptcy Law from ASEAN Partner Countries, China and Japan?,” Hasanuddin Law Review 8, no. 3 (2022): 194–210.
Johan, Suwinto. “Separatist Creditors Problems on Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Based on the Supreme Court’s Decree Number 30/KMA/SK/I/2020,” Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 3 (2021): 207–220.
Leonardus, Rado Fridsel, Alexander Yovie Pratama Yudha, and Tata Wijayanta. "Practice of Applying Affidavits in Bankruptcy Law and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations." Unnes Law Journal 9, no. 2 (2023): 467-488.
Manurung, Bicar Franki Leonardo, Elza Syarief, and Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah. "Legal Consequences of Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations: Are They Similar?." Journal of Law and Policy Transformation 7, no. 1 (2022): 85-96.
Mardiani, Henny. “Arbitration Agreement according to Indonesian Law”. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) 8, no. 1 (2024): 44–50.
Masturi, Frida Nurrahma, Adi Sulistiyono, and Yudho Taruno Muryanto. "The Role of the Good Faith Principle in Pre-Contractual Phase of E-Commerce." International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 7, no. 10 (2020): 520-526.
Nelson, Febby Mutiara, and Esther Melinia Sondang. "Striking A Balance Between Legal Certainty, Justice and Utility to End the Clash Between Bankruptcy and Criminal Proceedings in Court Decision No. 11/Pdt. Sus-Gugatan Lain-lain/2018/PN. Jkt. Pst and No. 3 K/Pdt. Sus-Pailit/2019." Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 6, no. 1 (2021): 185-198.
Onggowijaya, Hendra. “Regulation model for filing an actio pauliana lawsuit by creditors to revoke the debtor’s legal actions prior to declaration of bankruptcy by the commercial court,” International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science 11, no. 7 (2022): 350–356.
Palanissamy, Ayyappan, and R. Kesavamoorthy, “Automated Dispute Resolution System (ADRS) - A Proposed Initial Framework for Digital Justice in Online Consumer Transactions in India,” Procedia Computer Science 165 (2019): 224–231.
Pitaloka, Aldiva. Marjo Marjo, and Zil Aidi. "The Role of the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) in the Prevention and Settlement of Business Disputes in Indonesia." Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainability in Technological, Environmental, Law, Management, Social and Economic Matters, ICOSTELM 2022, 4-5 November 2022, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. 2023.
Prasaja, Juhaya S. Teori Hukum dan Aplikasinya (Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia, 2014).
Putri, Szyva Silviana, Gunardi Lie, and Moody Rizqy Syailendra Putra, “The Urgency of Good Faith Principles in Production Sharing Cooperation Contracts with the Gross Split System,” QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia 2, no. 1 (2023): 462–66.
Rasjidi, Lili, and Wyasa Putra, Hukum sebagai Suatu Sistem. (Bandung: Rosdakarya, 1993).
Rumaidan, Ismail. Pelaksanaan dan Hambatan Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase Oleh Pengadilan Negeri. (Jakarta: Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Badan Litbang Diklat Kumdil Mahkamah Agung RI, 2016).
Saputra, Rian, and Resti Dian Luthviati. "Institutionalization of the approval principle of majority creditors for bankruptcy decisions in bankruptcy act reform efforts." Journal of Morality and Legal Culture 1, no. 2 (2020): 104-112.
Sidharta, Bernard Arief. Refleksi Tentang Stuktur Ilmu Hukum : Sebuah Penelitian Tentang Fondasi Kefilsafatan dan Sifat Keilmuan Ilmu Hukum Sebagai Landasan Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Nasional Indonesia. (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2000).
Sihotang, Zeffrianto. “Duties And Authority of PKPU Management Basen on Law No. 37 of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension Debt Payment Obligations,” Journal of Law Science 3, no. 1 (2021): 15–24.
Simaremare, Sumurung P., Bismar Nasution, Sunarmic, and Edi Yunara, “Reviewing the Comparison of the Legal Bankruptcy System Between Indonesia and the Netherlands,” Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT) 12, no. 6 (2021): 2290–2296.
Sinaga, Sarman, Gomgom T.P. Siregar, and Lamminar Hutabarat, “The model of business dispute resolution on electronic transactions in Indonesia,” Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems 12, no. 6 (2020): 573–580.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003).
Subrata, Rusli. “Mechanisms of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Conflict and Dispute Resolution in Indonesia,” Litigasi 24, no. 24 (2023): 151–164.
Sukardi, Didi. "The Legal Responsibility of Debtor to Payment Curators in Bankruptcy Situation." Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 8, no. 2 (2021): 142-156.
Sunarmi, Sunarmi. Hukum Kepailitan, (Jakarta: PT. Sofemedia, 2010).
Toha, Kurnia, and Sonyendah Retnaningsih, “Legal policy granting status of fresh start to the individual bankrupt debtor in developing the bankruptcy law in Indonesia,” Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 9, no. 2 (2020): 157–161.
Wang, Jeff Jianfeng, et al. "Conflict aftermath: Dispute resolution and financial performance in franchising." Journal of Retailing 96, no. 4 (2020): 548-562.
Yuniar, Vania Shafira, and Florentiana Yuwono. "The Comparison of Arbitration Dispute Resolution Process Between Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) and London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA)." Journal of Private and Commercial Law 6, no. 1 (2022): 77-99.
Downloads
Article ID
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
