Paradigmatic Problems of Industrial Relation Dispute Settlement on the Perspective of Pancasila Industrial Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.vol5i1.2102Keywords:
Legal Ideals, Paradigm, Pancasila Industrial Relations, ReformulationsAbstract
Act Number 2 of 2004 Concerning the Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes (PPHI Act) has several paradigmatic issues. It has been almost two decades since the PPHI Act went into effect. To adapt to shifting needs and consider changes, amendments have never been implemented. The impartiality of mediators who are not chosen by the disputing parties, the existence of ad hoc judges who are not law graduates, inconsistent standards relating to one's ability to testify in court, government interference, punishments, etc. are the fundamental issues. These facts emphasize that the Pancasila Industrial Relations Paradigm is not followed by the PPHI Act as a legislative ideal. It is not surprising that the justice and certainty that workers hope for are only dreams. Laborers no longer hold a strategic position as actors and objectives of national development because they have normatively become victims of injustice in industrial relations. In addition to identifying the normative inconsistencies between the Pancasila Industrial Relations Principles and the PPHI Act, this research aims to promote a shift toward a more just and equitable approach to resolving industrial relations disputes. This study belongs to juridical normative research by adopting the legal regulations as the object. It applies statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results show that the PPHI Act has paradigmatic problems. Essentially, it does not adhere to the values of Pancasila industrial relations. Thus, reformulation is highly recommended.
References
Act No. 30 of 1999 Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (1999).
Act Number 2 of 2004 concerning Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes (2004).
Adolf, Huala. “Chandrawulan, Masalahmasalah Hukum Dalam Perdagangan Internasional.” Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 1994.
Agus, Dede. “Eksistensi Hubungan Industrial Pancasila Pasca Disahkannya Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 8, no. 1 (2023): 87–100. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v8i1.6276.
Ariani, Nevey Varida. “Gugatan Sederhana Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum P-ISSN 1410 (2018): 5632.
Arsalan, Haikal, and Dinda Silviana Putri. “Reformasi Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.” Jurnal HAM 11, no. 1 (2020): 39–49. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.39-50.
Balai Pustaka, P N. “Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia,” 2001.
Banjaransari, Ayu Putri Rainah Petung. “Investment Effect on Wage System in Pancasila Industrial Relations Based on Job Creation Law.” Jurnal Hukum Prasada 9, no. 1 (2022): 45–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22225/jhp.9.1.2022.45-52.
Black, Henry Cambell. “Black’s Law Dictionary Fifht Edition.” West Publishing Company, St Paul Minn, 1979.
Dewi Rismayanti Pratiwi, Pratiwi. “Analisis Hukum Penerapan Asas Contante Justitie Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Hubungan Industrial.” Universitas Balikpapan, 2019.
Emirzon, Joni. Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan, 2022.
Euwema, Martin C, Francisco J Medina, Ana Belén García, and Erica Romero Pender. Mediation in Collective Labor Conflicts. Springer Nature, 2019.
Faisal, Fahmi. “Mekanisme Penyelesaian Perselisihan Secara Litigasi Dalam Sistem Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.” WASAKA HUKUM 7, no. 2 (2019): 299–330.
Fuqoha, F. “Tinjauan Yuridis Kekuatan Hukum Penyelesian Perselisihan Non-Litigasi Dalam Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.” Indonesian State Law Review 2, no. 2 (2020): 119–37.
Gultom, Sri Subiandini. Aspek Hukum Hubungan Industrial. Hecca Publishing, 2005.
Hadjon, Philipus M. “Argumentasi Hukum,” 2008.
Hanafi, Muhammad Fikri, and Sunny Ummul Firdaus. “Implementasi Teori Hans Nawiasky Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Souvereignty 1, no. 1 (2022): 79–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13057/souvereignty.v1i1.192.
Handayani, Pristika. “Kelemahan Peraturan Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.” PETITA 3, no. 2 (2021): 259–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33373/pta.v3i2.3831.
Hanito, Ronny. “Hukum Dan Masalah Penyelesaian Konflik.” Majalah Fakutas Hukum UNDIP, Semarang, 1984.
Harianto, Aries. “Does Religious Holiday Allowance Policy during Covid-19 Provide Legal Certainty?” Journal Sriwijaya Law Review 5 (2021). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol5.Iss1.673.pp86-100.
Harianto, Aries. “Reformulation of Contractus Sui Generis Wage Arrangement of Work Agreement After Covid-19 Pandemic.” Brawijaya Law Journal 10, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2023.010.01.01.
Hartono, Sunaryati. Penelitian Hukum Di Indonesia Pada Akhir Abad. 2nd ed. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti, 1994.
Irawan, Nuryansyah. “Studi Yuridis Normatif Implementasi Regulasi Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.” Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan 18, no. 1 (2022): 47–63. https://doi.org/10.47198/jnaker.v18i1.147.
Kasim, Ifdhal. Gerakan Studi Hukum Kritis. INSISTPress, 1999.
Kasra, Helwan. “Kritik Terhadap Sistem Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Di Indonesia: Studi Uu No 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Perspektif Teori Sistem Hukum.” Sol Justicia 5, no. 1 (2022): 97–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54816/sj.v5i1.484.
Kususiyanah, Anjar. “Hubungan Industrial Pancasila Dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law 1, no. 2 (2021): 42–59. https://doi.org/10.21154/invest.v1i2.3478.
Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. “Penelitian Hukum.” Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media 55 (2005).
Mantili, Rai. “Konsep Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Antara Serikat Pekerja Dengan Perusahaan Melalui Combined Process (Med-Arbitrase).” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 6, no. 1 (2021): 47–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i1.252.
Mawarni, Mahdian Astira, Siti Kunarti, and Kadar Pamuji. “Implemenatasi Pasal 103 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Semarang,” 2020.
Munir, Fuady. “Teori-Teori Besar (Grand Theory) Dalam Hukum.” Jakarta: Kencana, 2013.
Nurjaya, I Nyoman. “Indonesian Labour Law Development and Reform: The Years of Ratifying Fundamental Human Rights Defined within the ILO Core Conventions.” US-China Law Review 7 (2010): 42.
Partanto, Pius A, and M Dahlan Al Barry. “Kamus Ilmiah Populer.” Surabaya: Arkola 37 (1994): 23.
Prasetyo, Teguh, and Abdul Halim Barkatullah. “Filsafat, Teori Dan Ilmu Hukum, Pemikiran Menuju Masyarakat Yang Berkeadilan Dan Bermartabat, Jakarta: PT.” RajaGrafindo Persada, 2014.
Sari, A. D. K. “Hotman Paris Sebut Urus Pesangon Buruh Makan Waktu Lama, Apa Solusinya?” Kabar 24, 2020.
Saud, Muhammad, Rachmah Ida, Ansar Abbas, Asia Ashfaq, and Araz Ramazan Ahmad. “The Social Media and Digitalization of Political Participation in Youths: An Indonesian Perspective.” Society 8, no. 1 (2020): 83–93.
Sherly, Sherly Ayuna Putri, Agus Mulya Karsona, and Revi Inayatillah. “Pembaharuan Penyelesaian Perselisihan Ketenagakerjaan Di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Berdasarkan Asas Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Murah Sebagai Upaya Perwujudan Kepastian Hukum.” Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum 5, no. 2 (2021): 310–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v5i2.307.
Siswanto, Wahyudi, Narita Adityaningrum, and Reni Dwi Purnomowati. “Pelembagaan Lks Bipartit Di Tingkat Perusahaan Sebagai Mekanisme Upaya Pencegahan Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Di Tempat Kerja.” Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia 2, no. 8 (2023): 1922–31.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Purnadi Purbacaraka. “Perihal Kaidah Hukum.” Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993.
Sunarno, Sunarno. “Beberapa Masalah Pada Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu Dan Solusinya.” Jurnal Wacana Hukum 8, no. 2 (2009): 23529. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v8i2.310.
Sunda, Ujang. “Dipaparkan Bamsoet: Duh Masih Banyak UU Yang Bertentangan Dengan Pancasila.” Rakyat Merdeka, 2021. tps://rm.id/baca-berita/parlemen/77488/dipaparkan-bamsoet-duh-masih-banyak-uu-yang-bertentangan-dengan-pancasila.
Tjandra, Surya, and Marina Pangaribuan. Kompilasi Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Terseleksi 2006-2007. TURC, 2007.
Tobing, Christina N M. “Menggagas Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Dalam Bingkai Ius Constituendum Sebagai Upaya Perwujudan Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan/Initiating an Industrial Relations Court in the Framework of Ius Constituendum as an Effort to Realize Legal Certainty and Justi.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 7, no. 2 (2018): 297–326. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.2.2018.297-326.
Usman, Rachmadi. Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.
Wasi, Rahadi. “Kajian Ontologis Lembaga Mediasi Di Pengadilan.” Jurnal Penelitian 257 (2016): 257–58. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v31i1.1959.
Wicaksono, Raden Mas Try Ananto Djoko. “Analisis Perbandingan Hukum Penanaman Modal Asing Antara Indonesia Dengan Vietnam (Tinjauan Dari Undang-Undang No. 25 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penanaman Modal Dan Law No. 67/2014/QH13 On Investment).” Jurnal Al Azhar Indonesia Seri Ilmu Sosial 2, no. 1 (2021): 7–23. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.36722/jaiss.v2i1.509.
Woeryono, B. “Study of Omnibus Law on the Legal Politics of the Indonesian Government in Using Foreign Workers.” Open J. Legal Stud. 3 (2020): 143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojls.0302.06143w.
Zhuang, Wenjia, and Feng Chen. “‘Mediate First’: The Revival of Mediation in Labour Dispute Resolution in China.” The China Quarterly 222 (2015): 380–402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741015000739.
Zulkarnaen, Ahmad Hunaeni. “Masalah Rawan Dalam Hubungan Industrial Dan Konsep Negara Kesejahteraan Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia 2, no. 2 (June 7, 2018): 806.
Downloads
Article ID
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
