Guideline for Reviewers
With respect, to review articles, the review process in Kreano Journal is based on the suitability of the article with the manuscript template. The reviewer/referee will assess whether the article content matches the template. The selection of reviewers/referees is based on their respective expertise, and therefore, content assessment is completely left to the reviewers as part of their respective expert judgment.
To make assessment easier, the review will use a form containing assessments including:
ABSTRACT. The abstract begins with sentences that describes the GAP of your research. Next, the abstract is continued with research objectives, research methods, results, and conclusions. NOVELTY of the research should be declared. At the end of the abstract, the implications of this research need to be stated. The abstract is written briefly in no more than 350 words.
INTRODUCTION. The introduction contains the research background (the story of the phenomena or critical paradigm of the study), theoretical framework, GAP of the study, and ended with a problem statement. The theoretical framework must be justified with the research results. The introduction should be able to explain the contribution of this research in the field.
METHOD. Method should consist of: 1) participants ; 2) instruments ; 3) data collection ; 4) data analysis.
RESULT AND DISCUSSION. The important rule of Discussion that author must discuss the result of research compared with theoretical GAP. For example, if author develop any media for mathematics teaching than connect it with how the student think when they use the media. Or author may consult with the theory of student respond. This discussion makes NOVELTY and State of art of the manuscript.
CONCLUSION. The conclusion shows a summary of the research results, short, clear and comprehensive. The summary also shows possible future research.
The Step of Review are as follows:
