Legal Protection for Teachers from the Threat of Criminalization in Instilling Student Discipline
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.vol19i1.1046Keywords:
Teacher, Legal Protection, CriminalizationAbstract
Teachers as professional educators play a crucial role in efforts to educate the life of the Indonesian nation. Increasing the level of criminalization of teachers, due to the act of reporting teachers to the Police in certain cases when teachers are carrying out duties. This study aims to determine and analyze legal protection for teachers in instilling student discipline values from the threat of criminalization and analyze efforts to optimize teacher legal protection from the threat of criminalization in instilling student discipline. The urgency of this study is to see from the perspective of the case of teachers who are suspected of committing criminal acts, teachers as educators in carrying out professional duties are suspected of violating the law or suspected of committing criminal acts, where teachers in that case are carrying out their profession and in this study it is important to do because it is to provide understanding, especially teachers in carrying out their profession when faced with a legal problem. The research used data collection methods, namely mixed methods. Qualitative includes an interview guide for resource persons containing a list of questions or topics to be discussed in the interview. Quantitative is collecting and analyzing data based on numbers and numerical measurements. This approach aims to describe, explain, and test relationships between variables using statistical analysis. The results showed that teachers in carrying out their professional duties have not received maximum legal protection. The final results show that given the large number of cases involving teachers having to deal with the law, this needs to be handled seriously in protecting teachers' laws from the threat of criminalization in carrying out their professional duties and instilling discipline in students.
References
Akib, Muh. “Beberapa Pandangan Tentang Guru Sebagai Pendidik.” Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan 10, no. 1 (2007): 15–33. https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2007v10n1a2.
Alsup, Janet. Millennial Teacher Identity Discourses. Millennial Teacher Identity Discourses, 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351036542.
Anam, Saiful. “System of Recruitment of Legal Profession In A Nation of Law of Pancasila.” Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal) 12, no. 1 (2017): 10–18.
AS, Yenny, and Rini Setiawati. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Guru Yang Berkeadilan Di Kota Pontianak.” Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti 3, no. 2 (2019): 153–64. https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v3i2.105.
Creswell, Jhon W. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Dan Mixed. 4th ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar, 2016.
Efendi, Erlan, and M. Ainal Hakim. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Guru Terkait Tindakan Pemberian Hukuman (Punishment) Kepada Siswanya.” Lexstricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2022): 59–70. https://doi.org/10.46839/lexstricta.v1i1.6.
Friskila Sitanggang, Irma Batubara, Apona Manik, and Helena Turnip. “Peran Guru Sebagai Pendidik Yang Profesional Dalam Administrasi Peserta Didik.” GEMILANG: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Akuntansi 3, no. 1 (2022): 281–90. https://doi.org/10.56910/gemilang.v3i1.340.
Fuad, Fokky, Istiqomah Istiqomah, and Suparji Achmad. “Dialektika Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Guru Dalam Mendisiplinkan Siswa Di Sekolah.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Policy Studies 1, no. 1 (2020): 55. https://doi.org/10.31000/ijlp.v1i1.2634.
Gary, Barkhuizen. “Narrative Approaches to Exploring Language, Identity and Power in Language Teacher Education.” RELC Journal 47, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.1177/0033688216631222.
Gazali, Ahmad. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Guru Yang Memberikan Sanksi Fisik Dalam Batas Wajar Terhadap Peserta Didik.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia 2, no. 1 (2021): 40–68. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i1.6.
Harisman Harisman. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Guru Dalam Menjalankan Tugas Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran.” DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 1 (2020): 79–93. https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v5i1.3452.
Hinostroza-Paredes, Yenny. “University Teacher Educators’ Professional Agency: A Literature Review.” Professions and Professionalism 10, no. 2 (2020): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.3544.
Jim, Ryder. “Being Professional: Accountability and Authority in Teachers’ Responses to Science Curriculum Reform.” Studies in Science Education 51, no. 1 (2015): 87–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2014.1001629.
Komara, Endang. “Perlindungan Profesi Guru Di Indonesia.” Mimbar Pendidikan 1, no. 2 (2016): 151. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbardik.v1i2.3938.
Laoh, Yehezkiel Eka, and Wenly R.J Lololng. “Perlindungan Profesi Guru Atas Kekerasan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Siswa.” Jurnal Civic Education: Media Kajian Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan 4, no. 2 (2021): 16. https://doi.org/10.36412/ce.v4i2.2375.
Lawrence M. Friedman. Sistem Hukum : Perspektif Ilmu Sosial. Edited by Nurainun Mangunsong. 4th ed. Bandung: Bandung Nusa Media, 2011.
Maskur, Muhammad Azil. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Nakal (Juvenile Delinquency) Dalam Proses Acara Pidana Indonesia.” Pandecta: Research Law Journal 7, no. 2 (2012): 172.
Matnuh, Harpani. “Perlindungan Hukum Profesionalisme Guru.” Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan 7, no. 2 (2017): 46–50.
Mawardi, Isal. “Guru Dikatapel Ortu Murid Hingga Buta, PGRI Minta Kemendikbud Turun Tangan.” detiknews, 2023. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6868258/guru-dikatapel-ortu-murid-hingga-buta-pgri-minta-kemendikbud-turun-tangan.
Meliana, Ruth. “Fakta Guru Madrasah Dibacok Siswa Di Demak: Kronologi, Motif Dan Kondisi Terkini,” 2023. https://www.suara.com/news/2023/09/26/162141/fakta-guru-madrasah-dibacok-siswa-di-demak-kronologi-motif-dan-kondisi-terkini.
Nagel, Ilka, Gréta Björk Guðmundsdóttir, and Hilde Wågsås Afdal. “Teacher Educators’ Professional Agency in Facilitating Professional Digital Competence.” Teaching and Teacher Education 132 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104238.
Nanang, Herlina Manullang, and July Esther. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Guru Yang Mangalami Pengaduan Akibat Tindakan Guru Saat Menjalankan Profesi Mengajar.” Nommensen Journal of Legal Opinion 3, no. 1 (2022): 45–58. https://doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v3i1.612.
Nawawi, Jumriani. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Profesi Guru Dari.” Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik Islam 4 (2019): 159–72.
Nickerson, Amanda, Sunha Kim, Melissa Dudley, Jennifer A. Livingston, and Margaret Manges. “Longitudinal Impact of the Second Step Child Protection Unit on Teacher Knowledge, Attitude, and Climate.” Children and Youth Services Review 123 (2021): 105892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105892.
Popper-Giveon, A., & Shayshon, B. “Educator versus Subject Matter Teacher: The Conflict between Two Sub-Identities in Becoming a Teacher.” Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice 23, no. 5 (2017): 532–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1218841.
Prakoso, Abdul Rahman, and Rinaldi Hermawan. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Profesi Guru Atas Tindakan Pemberian Hukuman Terhadap Siswa.” Prosiding “Profesionalisme Guru Abad XXI”, Seminar Nasional IKA UNY Tahun 2018, 2018, 177–87.
Putra, Nusa, and Hendarman. Mixed Method Research : Metode Riset Campur Sari Konsep, Strategi Dan Aplikasi. Edited by Tim Indeks. Cetakan 1. Jakarta: PT. Indeks, 2013.
Rahmatollahi, Maryam, and Zohre Mohamadi Zenouzagh. “Designing and Validating an Evaluation Inventory for Assessing Teachers’ Professional Accountability.” Language Testing in Asia 11, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00128-3.
Ruohotie-Lyhty, Maria. “Struggling for a Professional Identity: Two Newly Qualified Language Teachers’ Identity Narratives during the First Years at Work.” Teaching and Teacher Education 30, no. 1 (2013): 120–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.11.002.
Ruohotie-Lyhty, Maria, and Josephine Moate. “Who and How? Preservice Teachers as Active Agents Developing Professional Identities.” Teaching and Teacher Education 55 (2016): 318–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.022.
Sarkio, Katri, Tiina Korhonen, and Kai Hakkarainen. “Tracing Teachers’ Perceptions of Entanglement of Digitally-Mediated Educational Activities and Learning Environments: A Practice-Oriented Method.” Learning Environments Research 26, no. 2 (2023): 469–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09442-w.
Satjipto, R. Ilmu Hukum. Cetakan 6. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.
Schutz, P. A., Hong, J., & Cross, D. I. (Eds.). Research on Teacher Identity: Mapping Challenges and Innovations. Cross Francis, Dionne, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93836-3.
Sidik, M. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Guru Yang Melakukan Kekerasan Terhadap Siswa.” Jurnal As-Said 1, no. 1 (2021): 67–74.
Sirk, Meidi, Reeli Liivik, and Krista Loogma. “Changes in the Professionality of Vocational Teachers as Viewed through the Experiences of Long-Serving Vocational Teachers in Estonia.” Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training 8, no. 1 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-016-0039-7.
Stumbrienė, Dovilė, Tatjana Jevsikova, and Vita Kontvainė. Key Factors Influencing Teachers’ Motivation to Transfer Technology-Enabled Educational Innovation. Education and Information Technologies. Vol. 29. Springer US, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11891-6.
Sugiyono. Pengumpulan Data Dan Instrumen Penelitian. 1st ed., 2013.
Susilowati, Hani Khotijah. “Efektivitas Proses Pelaksanaan Bimbingan Teknis Kurikulum Tingkat Satu Pendidikan (Studi Kasus Provinsi DI. Yogyakarta).” Lontar UI, 2010. https://lontar.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/129261-T+26799-Efektvitas++proses-Metodologi.pdf.
Sutopo, Joko, and Krismiyarsi. “Legal Protection of Professional Teacher in Criminal Law Perspective.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 20, no. 5 (2019): 258–64.
Tejada Fernández, José. “Professionalisation of Teaching in Universities: Implications from a Training Perspective.” RUSC. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad Del Conocimiento 10, no. 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v10i1.1471.
Tengah, Tim LKBH PGRI Provinsi Jawa. “Penanganan Kasus Guru Di LKBH PGRI Provinsi Jawa Tengah, Berdasarkan Data 5 Tahun Terakhir.” Semarang, 2023.
Utomo, Widi. “Hasil Wawancara.” Semarang, 2023.
Vieira, Cristiano Rogério, and Neuza Pedro. “Weaknesses of ICT Integration in the Initial Teacher Education Curriculum.” Computers and Education Open 5, no. October 2022 (2023): 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100150.
Walsh, Kerryann, Lesley anne Ey, Kirstine Hand, Rhiannon Smith, Sarah Howard, Angela Fenton, Chrystal Whiteford, Meegan Brown, Rachel Pinnock, and Lauren Rodier. “Child Protection and Safeguarding in Initial Teacher Education: A Systematic Scoping Review.” Children and Youth Services Review 150, no. February (2023): 106951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.106951.
Widjoretno, Ulis. “Hasil Wawancara.” Semarang, 2023.
Wijiatmo, Supanto. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Guru Dalam Hal Kedisplinan.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi 7, no. 1 (2019): 85. https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i1.29200.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
1046Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sapto Budoyo, Wahyu Widodo, Suyadi Suyadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) is an open-access license that facilitates the sharing and adaptation of creative works while ensuring proper attribution and preserving the same freedoms for derivative works. This license is designed to be user-friendly and applicable globally, making it a popular choice for a wide range of content, from academic articles to creative arts.
At its core, the Attribution component of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license requires users to give appropriate credit to the original creator of the work. This includes providing a clear citation, linking to the license, and indicating any modifications made. The attribution must be done in a way that does not imply endorsement by the creator of the new use or its creator. This ensures that the original authors are acknowledged for their contributions while allowing their work to be freely used and disseminated.
The ShareAlike aspect of the license mandates that any derivative works or adaptations created from the original must be licensed under the same CC BY-SA 4.0 terms. This means that new works based on the original content must also be freely available and shareable under the same conditions. This provision helps to promote a culture of collaboration and continuous improvement, as it ensures that all adaptations remain accessible to the public and contribute to the collective pool of knowledge and creativity.
