Identifying Middle School Students’ Perceptions of STEAM Careers

G. Ozkan(1), U. U. Topsakal(2),


(1) Yildiz Technical University, Turkey
(2) Yildiz Technical University, Turkey

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify the students' perceptions of STEAM careers. The effect of the STEAM intervention on students’ perceptions was evaluated using one group pretest - posttest experimental design with career questionnaire. The sampling of the study consists of 37 seventh grade middle school students. In the study, STEAM activities were used in the teaching of the Force and Energy unit. First of all, the students were asked about their career choices and their responses were evaluated quantitatively. There was statistically significant difference between the distributions of changes in the number of students choosing STEAM careers. Content analysis also was performed on the findings obtained from the questionnaire. As a result of the study, it was determined that the students increased the percentage of choosing careers in the STEAM career fields such as scientists and engineering. Looking at the interest of students in STEAM fields, one of the biggest changes was in the field of science. One of the important findings of the research was that after the implementation, the majority of the students thought that gender was not important in the success of STEAM career fields. The results of the research revealed that the STEAM education approach can be used a lot to evaluate and improve the academic career choices of middle school students.                                                                            

Keywords

Career perceptions, Career development, Middle school, STEAM, STEM

Full Text:

PDF

References

Babarovic, T. (2021). Development of STEM vocational interests during elementary and middle school: a cohort-sequential longitudinal study. Journal of Career Development,49(6), 1230-1250. https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453211036986

Barakat, R. (2022). Science and representation: examining the role of supplementary STEM education in elementary school student science identity. SN Social Sciences, 2(3), 1-19.

Bass, K. M., Dahl, I. H., & Panahandeh, S. (2016). Designing the Game: How a Project-Based Media Production Program Approaches STEAM Career Readiness for Underrepresented Young Adults. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 1009-1024.

Cantrell, P., & Ewing‐Taylor, J. (2009). Exploring STEM career options through collaborative high school seminars. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 295-303.

Darmaji, D., Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D. A., & Putri, W. A. (2022). Science process skills and critical thinking ability assessed from students' gender. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 18(1), 83-95.

Drymiotou, I., Constantinou, C. P., & Avraamidou, L. (2021). Enhancing students’ interest in science and understandings of STEM careers: the role of career-based scenarios. International Journal of Science Education, 43(5), 717-736.

English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(14), 1-18.

Ginzberg, E., Ginsburg, S.W., Axelrad, S., & Herma, J.L. (1951). Occupational Choice. New York: Columbia University.

Gracin, D.G., Babarovic, T., Devic, I., & Burusic, J. (2018). Development and validation of new objective school achievement tests in the STEM field for primary school students. Croatian Journal of Education, 20(3), 789-824.

Grant, K. L., Springer, S. I., Tuttle, M., & Reno, M. (2021). Small-group counseling intervention to support career exploration of rural middle school students. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 46(1), 108-127.

Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P., & Shanahan, M.C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978-1003.

Heise, N., Hall, H. A., Ivie, K. R., Meyer, C. A., & Clapp, T. R. (2020). Engaging high school students in a university-led summer anatomy camp to promote STEM majors and careers. Journal of STEM Outreach, 3(1), 1-7.

Hiğde, E., & Aktamış, H. (2022). The effects of STEM activities on students’ STEM career interests, motivation, science process skills, science achievement and views. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101000.

Hoang, N. T., & Huy, D. T. N. (2021). Determining factors for educating students for choosing to work for foreign units: Absence of self-efficacy. JETT, 12(2), 11-19.

Jho, H., Hong, O., & Song, J. (2016). An analysis of STEM/STEAM teacher education in Korea with a case study of two schools from a community of practice perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1843-1862.

Jimenez, K., Cribbs, J., & Gill, N. (2018). College students’ perceptions of gender stereotypes: making connections to the underrepresentation of women in STEM fields. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1432-1454.

John, D. D., Chen, Y., Navaee, S., & Gao, W. (2018). Board 57: STEM Education from the Industry Practitioners’ Perspective. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

Kim, B. H., & Kim, J. (2016). Development and validation of evaluation indicators for teaching competency in STEAM education in Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1909-1924.

Kong, X., Dabney, K.P., & Tai, R.H. (2014). The association between science summer camps and career interest in science and engineering, International Journal of Science Education, 4(1), 54-65.

Liliawati, W., Rusnayati, H., Purwanto, & Aristantia, G. (2017). Implementation of STEAM Education to Improve Mastery Concept. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 288(1), 1–5.

Luo, T., So, W. W. M., Wan, Z. H., & Li, W. C. (2021). STEM stereotypes predict students’ STEM career interest via self-efficacy and outcome expectations. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1-13.

Lv, B., Wang, J., Zheng, Y., Peng, X., & Ping, X. (2022). Gender differences in high school students' STEM career expectations: An analysis based on multi‐group structural equation model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21772

Mahat, M., Dollinger, M., D’Angelo, B., Naylor, R., & Harvey, A. (2022). Co-designing a curriculum model for career education: perspectives from regional communities in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00505-0

MEB, (2013). Secondary School Science Course Curriculum, Ankara: Ministry of National Education.

Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and Integration of Engineering in K-12 STEM Education. In Engineering in Precollege Settings: Research into Practice, edited by J. Strobel, S. Purzer, and M. Cardella, 35–60. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

O*NET (2019). Occupational Information Network. Retrieved from www.onetonline.org. U.S: National O*NET Consortium.

Oborah, J. O. (2022). Effectiveness of the infusion teaching approach for the development of general ICT skills in Nigerian tertiary education. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-11-2021-0076

Oh, J., Lee, J., & Kim, J. (2013). Development and Application of STEAM Based Education Program Using Scratch: Focus on 6th Graders’ Science in Elementary School. In Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, edited by J. Park, et al., 493-501. Dordrecht: Springer.

Ozkan, G., & Topsakal, U. (2020). A STEAM activity that can be used in science education. Ulakbilge Dergisi, 8(45), 185-199.

Park, N. (2014). The development of STEAM career education program using virtual reality technology. Life Science Journal, 11(7), 676-679.

Ritz, J. M., & Fan, S. C. (2015). STEM and technology education: International state-of-the-art. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25, 429-451.

Sahin, A., Gulacar, O., & Stuessy, C. (2015). High school students’ perceptions of the effects of international science Olympiad on their STEM career aspirations and twenty-first century skill development. Research in Science Education, 45(6), 785-805.

Sevilla, M. P., & Rangel, V. S. (2022). Gender differences in STEM career development in postsecondary vocational-technical education. A social cognitive career theory Test. Journal of Career Development, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453221086979

Steele, A., & Ashworth, E. L. (2018). Emotionality and STEAM integrations in teacher education. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 11-25.

Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2019). Investigating the use of robotics to increase girls’ interest in engineering during early elementary school. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(5), 1033-1051.

Taljaard, J. (2016). A review of multi-sensory technologies in a science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics (STEAM) classroom. Journal of Learning Design, 9(2), 46-55.

Tsakissiris, J., & Grant-Smith, D. (2021). The influence of professional identity and self-interest in shaping career choices in the emerging ICT workforce. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 22(1), 1-15.

Veen, V.D.J. (2012). Draw your physics homework? Art as a path to understanding teaching in physics. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 356–407.

Watson, S., Williams-Duncan, O. M., & Peters, M. L. (2022). School administrators’ awareness of parental STEM knowledge, strategies to promote STEM knowledge, and student STEM preparation. Research in Science & Technological Education, 40(1), 1-20.

Wyss, V. L., Heulskamp, D., & Siebert, C. J. (2012). Increasing middle school student interest in STEM careers with videos of scientists. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(4), 501-522.

Yamada, A. (2018). Developing global competencies through interdisciplinary studies: why collaboration is important between STEM and Non-STEM students. New Directions of STEM Research and Learning in the World Ranking Movement: A Comparative Perspective, 79-96.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License