Email this article Cognitive Flexibility of Students in Solving Mathematical Problems: A Phenomenology Study
Abstract
The importance of students' cognitive flexibility abilities in solving mathematical problems is the driving force behind this research. This study's goal was to identify and characterize students' levels of cognitive flexibility in handling mathematical problems in light of the indicators. This kind of study uses qualitative research techniques and a phenomenological design. The instrument employed is a test of problem-solving skills that has been supplemented with markers of cognitive flexibility to see the talents that have been assessed and interviews to learn more in-depth. In this study, data on students' capacities for cognitive flexibility in solving mathematical problems were collected and analyzed utilizing exams for such problem-solving and the indicators employed. Two markers of cognitive flexibility are included in this examination of mathematical problem-solving skills: (1) offering several interpretations of a picture, story, or mathematical issue, and (2) applying a variety of mathematical problem-solving techniques. According to the findings of this study, 5 participants fell into the flexible category, 6 people fell into the somewhat flexible category, and 4 participants fell into the less flexible category when it came to their ability to solve mathematical problems. The research's relevance is that future researchers and educational practitioners can attempt to construct learning to improve students' cognitive flexibility abilities in solving mathematical issues. This can be investigated in topics other than social arithmetic.
Latar belakang penelitian ini yaitu pentingnya kemampuan cognitive flexibility siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui serta mendeskripsikan kemampuan cognitive flexibility siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematis berdasarkan indikatornya. Jenis penelitian ini adalah desain fenomologi dengan metode kualitatif. Adapun penggunaan tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah yang telah diliputi indikaor kemampuan cognitve flexibilty untuk melihat kemampuan cognitive flexibilty yang telah diujikan dan wawancara untuk mengetahui lebih mendalam merupakan instrumen penelitian ini. Dalam penelitian ini, data diperoleh untuk melihat kemampuan cognitive flexibility siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematis yang dianalisis menggunakan tes pemecahan masalah matematis berikut indikator nya. Tes pemecahan masalah matematis ini memuat dua indikator kemampuan cognitive flexibility yaitu: 1) memberikan berbagai penafsiran terdapat suatu gambar, cerita, atau masalah matematis; dan 2) menggunakan beragam strategi penyelesaikan masalah matematis. Kesimpulan yang diperoleh dalam penelitian ini terkait kemampuan cognitive flexibility siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematis sebanyak 5 partisipan berada pada kategori fleksibel, 6 partisipan berada pada kategori cukup fleksibel, dan 4 partisipan berada pada kategori kurang fleksibel. Sehingga implikasi dalam peneltian adalah agar para peneliti selanjutnya maupun praktisi pendidikan dapat berupaya mendesain pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan kemampuan cognitive flexibility siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematis dan dapat diteliti pada materi lain selain aritmatika sosial.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Zoubi, E. M. (2020). Quality of Life and Its Relationship with Cognitive Flexibility among Higher Education Students. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(4), 156-167. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0075
Alzubi, E. M., Attiat, M. M., & Al-Adamat, O. A. (2022). Systemic intelligence predictors of cognitive flexibility and cognitive holding power among university students. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(2), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.18844/CJES.V17I2.6835
Arcavi, A., & Friedlander, A. (2007). Curriculum developers and problem solving: the case of Israeli elementary school projects. ZDM 2007 39:5, 39(5), 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11858-007-0050-3
Arifin, S., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Hartono, Y. (2021). On creativity through mathematization in solving non-routine problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 313–330. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.12.2.13885.313-330
Astutiani, R., & Isnarto, I. (2021). Problem Solving Ability Considered by Self Confidence in Digital Media Assisted Online Learning. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 12(2), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.15294/KREANO.V12I2.30828
Bilgic, B. S., Sonmez, A. O., & Erdogan, A. (2021). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and cognitive flexibility levels in high school students subjected to peer bullying. Haseki Tip Bulteni, 59(5), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.4274/HASEKI.GALENOS.2021.7791
Bilgin, M. (2009). Developing a cognitive flexibility scale: Validity and reliability studies. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(3), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.2224/SBP.2009.37.3.343
Boonen, A. J. H., Reed, H. C., Schoonenboom, J., & Jolles, J. (2016). It’s not a math lesson - we’re learning to draw! Teachers’ use of visual representations in instructing word problem solving in sixth grade of elementary school. Frontline Learning Research, 4(5), 34–61. https://doi.org/10.14786/FLR.V4I5.245
Bosch, P., Herrera, M., López, J., & Maldonado, S. (2018). Mining EEG with SVM for Understanding Cognitive Underpinnings of Math Problem Solving Strategies. Behavioural Neurology, 2018, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4638903
Bullot, N. J. (2009). Toward a theory of the empirical tracking of individuals: Cognitive flexibility and the functions of attention in integrated tracking. Philosophical Psychology, 22(3), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515080902969006
Cambaz, H. Z., & Ünal, G. (2021). Does Student’s Cognitive Flexibility Decrease During Pandemic? A New Approach to Measure Cognitive Flexibility. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 9(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-1-13-22
Chen, X., He, J., & Fan, X. (2019). Relationships between openness to experience, cognitive flexibility, self-esteem, and creativity among bilingual college students in the U.S. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(1), 342–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1688247
Chevalier, M., Giang, C., Piatti, A., & Mondada, F. (2020). Fostering computational thinking through educational robotics: a model for creative computational problem solving. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40594-020-00238-Z/FIGURES/9
Chung, S. H., Su, Y. F., & Su, S. W. (2012). The impact of cognitive flexibility on resistance to organizational change. Social Behavior and Personality, 40(5), 735–746. https://doi.org/10.2224/SBP.2012.40.5.735
Creswell, J. (2015). Educational research planning, implementation, and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Crosbie, S., Holm, A., & Dodd, B. (2009). Cognitive flexibility in children with and without speech disorder. Child Language Teaching and Ther-apy, 25(2), 250–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265659009102990
Damirchi, E. S., Pireinaladin, S., Akbari, T., & Dar-gahi, S. (2020). The prediction of the student’s tendency to computer games based on the brain-behavioral functions, cognitive flexibility and sensation seeking. Archives of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 1, 70–76. https://doi.org/10.12740/APP/109309
Darmadi, H. (2011). Educational research methods. Alfabeta.
Demirtaş, A. S. (2020). Optimism and happiness in undergraduate students: Cognitive flexibility and adjustment to university life as mediators. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psycholo-gy, 36(2), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.6018/ANALESPS.381181
Depdiknas. (2006). Standar Isi Mata Pelajaran Matematika Tingkat Sekolah Dasar dan Menen-gah (Content Standards for Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Subjects). Depdiknas.
Drew, C. J., Hardman, M. L., & Hosp, J. L. (2017). Educational research: Designing and carrying out research in the field of education. Permata Puri Media.
Ebersbach, M., & Hagedorn, H. (2011). The Role of Cognitive Flexibility in the Spatial Representation of Children’s Drawings. Journal of Cog-nition and Development, 12(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2011.539526
Fajri, H. M., Misdalina, M., & Kesumawati, N. (2021). Mathematical Problem Solving Ability of SMP 1 Kelekar Students Analized Based on Student Learning Motivation. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 12(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.15294/KREANO.V12I1.28337
Gajewski, P. D., Wild-Wall, N., Schapkin, S. A., Erd-mann, U., Freude, G., & Falkenstein, M. (2010). Effects of aging and job demands on cognitive flexibility assessed by task switching. Biological Psychology, 85(2), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOPSYCHO.2010.06.009
Gao, T., Zhao, J., Dou, K., Wang, Y., Li, X., & Harrison, S. E. (2018). Impact of cognitive flexibility on rapid reading skills training outcomes for primary school students in China. School Psychology International, 39(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034318773787
Gökçen, B., Laçin, D., & Yalçin, İ. (2019). Predictive Roles of Self-Efficacy and Coping Strategies in Cognitive Flexibility among University Students. Hacettepe University Journal of Edu-cation, 34(2), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018037424
Grežo, M., & Sarmány-Schuller, I. (2018). Do Emotions Matter? The Relationship Between Math Anxiety, Trait Anxiety, and Problem Solving Ability. Studia Psychologica, 60(4), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.21909/sp.2018.04.764
Gruber, A. J., Calhoon, G. G., Shusterman, I., Schoenbaum, G., Roesch, M. R., & O’Donnell, P. (2010). More Is Less: A Disinhibited Pre-frontal Cortex Impairs Cognitive Flexibility. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(50), 17102–17110. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4623-10.2010
Han, D. H., Park, H. W., Kee, B. S., Na, C., Na, D. H. E., & Zaichkowsky, L. (2011). Performance Enhancement with Low Stress and Anxiety Modulated by Cognitive Flexibility. Psychiatry Investigation, 8(3), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.4306/PI.2011.8.3.221
He, Z., Li, M., Liu, C., & Ma, X. (2022). Common Predictive Factors of Social Media Addiction and Eating Disorder Symptoms in Female College Students: State Anxiety and the Mediating Role of Cognitive Flexibil-ity/Sustained Attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 6182. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2021.647126
Hillier, A., Alexander, J. K., & Beversdorf, D. Q. (2006). The effect of auditory stressors on cognitive flexibility. Neurocase, 12(4), 228–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790600878887
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Szeto, E., Tai, K. H., & Tsai, C. R. (2021). Undergraduate Science Students’ Scientist–Practitioner Gap: the Role of Epistemic Curiosity and Cognitive Flexibility. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(5), 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10763-020-10096-4/TABLES/1
Jiatong, W., Murad, M., Li, C., Gill, S. A., & Ashraf, S. F. (2021a). Linking cognitive flexibility to en-trepreneurial alertness and entrepreneurial intention among medical students with the moderating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A second-order moderated medition model. PLOS ONE, 16(9), e0256420. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0256420
Jiatong, W., Murad, M., Li, C., Gill, S. A., & Ashraf, S. F. (2021b). Correction: Linking cognitive flexibility to entrepreneurial alertness and entrepreneurial intention among medical students with the moderating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A second-order moderated me-diation model. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0259491. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0259491
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613
Jones, R. A., Studies, R., & Spiro, R. (n.d.). Imagined Conversations: The Relevance of Hypertext, Pragmatism, and Cognitive Flexibility Theory to the Interpretation of “Classic Texts” in In-tellectual History. in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Hypertext (pp. 141-148). https://doi.org/10.1145/168466
Kingsdorf, S., & Krawec, J. (2016). Assessing a multi-component math intervention within a cognitive-behavioral framework on the word problem-solving responses of a diverse group of third graders. Cogent education, 3(1), 1160638. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1160638
Lloyd, J., Bond, F. W., & Flaxman, P. E. (2013). The value of psychological flexibility: Examining psychological mechanisms underpinning a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for burnout. Work & Stress an International Journal of Work, Health & Organisations, 27(2), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2013.782157
Lowrey, W., & Kim, K. S. (2009). Online News Media and Advanced Learning: A Test of Cognitive Flexibility Theory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(4), 547–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150903323388
Martin, M. M., & Anderson, C. M. (2009). The cognitive flexibility scale: Three validity studies. Communication Reports, 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219809367680
Martin, M. M., Staggers, S. M., & Anderson, C. M. (2011). The Relationships Between Cognitive Flexibility with Dogmatism, Intellectual Flexibility, Preference for Consistency, and Self-Compassion. Communication Research Reports, 28(3), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2011.587555
Martinez, J. K., & Dong, S. (2020). An Investigation of Multicultural Counseling Competence Development among Graduate-Level Counseling Students through Mindfulness, Cognitive Complexity, and Cognitive Flexibility. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 42(3), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10447-020-09400-2
Marzecová, A., Bukowski, M., Correa, Á., Boros, M., Lupiáñez, J., & Wodniecka, Z. (2013). Tracing the bilingual advantage in cognitive control: The role of flexibility in temporal preparation and category switching. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(5), 586–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.809348
Milla-Cano, C., & Gatica-Ferrero, S. (2020). Memo-ria de trabajo y flexibilidad cognitiva en niños típicos y con diagnóstico de TDAH. Avances En Psicología Latinoamericana , 38(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.12804/REVISTAS.UROSARIO.EDU.CO/APL/A.7743
Muyan-Yılık, M., & Demir, A. (2020). A Pathway Towards Subjective Well-Being for Turkish University Students: The Roles of Dispositional Hope, Cognitive Flexibility, and Coping Strategies. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(6), 1945–1963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00440-002-0236-0
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.
Prabowo, A., Suryadi, D., Dasari, D., Juandi, D., & Junaedi, I. (2022). Learning Obstacles in the Making of Lesson Plans by Prospective Mathematics Teacher Students. Education Research International, 2022, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2896860
Pratama, L. D., & Setyaningrum, W. (2018). GBL in Math Problem Solving: Is it Effective? International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 12(6), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V12I6.8658
Renner, K. H., & Beversdorf, D. Q. (2010). Effects of naturalistic stressors on cognitive flexibility and working memory task performance. Behavior, Cognition and Neuroscience, 16(4), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790903463601
Roy, M. H., & Dugal, S. S. (1998). Developing trust: The importance of cognitive flexibility and co-operative contexts. Management Decision, 36(9), 561–567. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810239441/
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. 409. Academic Press https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-05012-8
Silver, J. A., Hughes, J. D., Bornstein, R. A., & Bev-ersdorf, D. Q. (2004). Effect of anxiolytics on cognitive flexibility in problem solving. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 17(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.WNN.0000119240.65522.D9
Soewardini, H. M. D., Setiyawan, H., Suhartono, Amin, S. M., & Bon, A. T. Bin. (2019). An information technology-based learning to reduce math anxiety in solving problem. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, 9(1), 2117–2119. https://doi.org/10.35940/IJEAT.A9670.109119
Spensley, F., & Taylor, J. (1999). The Development of Cognitive Flexibility: Evidence from Children’s Drawings. Human Development, 42(6), 300–324. https://doi.org/10.1159/000022639
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D (Educational research methods quantitative, qualitative and R&D approaches). Alfabeta.
Swanson, H. L. (2015). Cognitive strategy interventions improve word problem solving and working memory in children with math disabilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1099. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2015.01099/BIBTEX
Swanson, H. L., Kong, J., & Petcu, S. D. (2019). Math problem-solving and cognition among emerging bilingual children at risk and not at risk for math difficulties. Child Neuropsychology A Journal on Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence, 26(4), 489–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2019.1674268
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15516709COG1202_4
Theeboom, T., Beersma, B., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (2015). The differential effects of solution-focused and problem-focused coaching questions on the affect, attentional control and cognitive flexibility of undergraduate students experiencing study-related stress. The Journal of Positive Psychology Dedicated to Fur-thering Research and Promoting Good Practice, 11(5), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1117126
Utemov, V. V., Ribakova, L. A., Kalugina, O. A., Slepneva, E. V., Zakharova, V. L., Belyalova, A. M., & Platonova, R. I. (2020). Solving Math Problems through the Principles of Scientific Creativity. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(10), em1887. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/8478
von Duyke, K., & Matusov, E. (2015). Flowery math: a case for heterodiscoursia in mathematics problems solving in recognition of students’ authorial agency. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2015.1090904
Wang, J., & Jou, M. (2020). The influence of mobile-learning flipped classrooms on the emotional learning and cognitive flexibility of students of different levels of learning achievement. Interactive Learning Environments. 28, 14 pages.https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1830806
Wang, R. N., & Chang, Y. C. (2022). Effect of Intrinsic Motivation on Junior High School Students’ Creativity: Mediating Role of Cognitive Flexibility. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(2), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.12973/IJEM.8.2.297
Wen, W. P., Ismail, N., Ali, M., Osman, S., & Talib, C. A. (2020). Application of Sakamoto math method in solving mathematical word prob-lems for year 5 pupils. ASM Science Journal, 13, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.32802/ASMSCJ.2020.SM26(2.5)
Yıldız Durak, H., & Atman Uslu, N. (2022). Investigating the effects of SOLO taxonomy with reflective practice on university students’ meta-cognitive strategies, problem-solving, cognitive flexibility, spatial anxiety: an em-bedded mixed-method study on 3D game development. Interactive Learning Environ-ments, 30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2067187
Zhang, H., Kranzler, H. R., Poling, J., Gruen, J. R., & Gelernter, J. (2009). Cognitive Flexibility is Associated with KIBRA Variant and Modulat-ed by Recent Tobacco Use. Neuropsycho-pharmacology, 34(12), 2508–2516. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2009.80
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
