Main Article Content
This study aims to test whether learning with the Means-Ends Analysis (MEA) model achieves learning completeness and knows the description of the ability to think creative with the MEA model in terms of student leraning styles. Research is a research mixed methods model of concurrent triangulation. The population of this research is students of class VIII one of Junior High School in Pekalongan in the academic year 2018/2019, a sample of students of class VIII-F. Research subjects were students of class VIII-F selected with purposive sampling technique, selected 4 students from the type of visual and auditory learning styles, and 3 students from the type of kinesthetic learning style. Quantitative data were analyzed using the one-party average test and the one-party proportion test. Whereas qualitative data were analyzed using the Miles adnd Huberman model, namely making verbal data transcripts, data reduction, data analysis, and making conclusions. The result showed that: (1) learning with the MEA model achieved mastery learning; and (2) description of creative thinking abilities of students with models of MEA in terms of students learning styles that students with visual learning style meet three indicators of creative thinking that fluency fluency, originality, and elaboration; students with learning styles of auditory almost all meet the four indicators of creative thinking that fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration; students with kinesthetic learning style meets the four indicators of creative thinking that fluency, flexibility, originality, and elaboration.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
UJME is a peer reviewed and open access journal that publishes significant and important research from all area of mathematics education. This journal provides immediate open access to its content that making research publish in this journal freely available to the public that supports a greater exchange of knowledge.
Submission of a manuscript implies that the submitted work has not been published before (except as part of a thesis or report, or abstract); that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere; that its publication has been approved by all co-authors. If and when the manuscript is accepted for publication, the author(s) still hold the copyright and retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors or others are allowed to multiply article as long as not for commercial purposes. For the new invention, authors are suggested to manage its patent before published. The license type is CC-BY-SA 4.0.
No responsibility is assumed by publisher and co-publishers, nor by the editors for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a result of any actual or alleged libelous statements, infringement of intellectual property or privacy rights, or products liability, whether resulting from negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any ideas, instructions, procedures, products or methods contained in the material therein.
Subur, J. 2013. “Analisis Kreativitas Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Berdasarkan Tingkat Kemampuan Matematika di Kelas”. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 14(1): 49-54.
Kadir & La Masi. 2014. Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills Of Student Junior High School In Kendari City. Prosiding1st International Seminar on Innovation in Mathematics and Mathematics Education. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Kurniasih, A.W., 2012. “Scaffolding sebagai Alternatif Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematika”. Jurnal Kreano, 5(2): 113-124.
Mullis, I.V.S., M.O. Martin, P. Foy, & A. Arora. 2012. TIMSS 2011 international Result in Mathematics. USA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
Armada, T.S. 2012. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Means-Ends Analysis (MEA) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Pada Siswa Kelas V SD Gugus V Kecamatan Sukasada. Artikel. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. Singaraja: Undiksha
Sari, Y. N. 2018. “Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Means Ends Analysis Menggunakan Media Video Terhadap Keaktifan Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Di SMA Negeri 3 Pagar Alam”. Jurnal Profit, 5(1): 89-104.
Umar, W. 2017. “Constructing Means Ends Analysis Instruction to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Ability and Mathematical Habits of Mind Dispositions”. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(2): 261-272.
Gunawan, A. 2012. Genius Learning Strategy: Petunjuk Praktis untuk Menerapkan Accelarated Learning. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Chatib, M. 2014. Orangtuanya Manusia: Melejitkan Potensi Kecerdasan dengan Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Kaifa.
Triwibowo, Z., Dwidayati, N. K., Sugiman. 2017. “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar Siswa Kelas VII Melalui Model Pembelajaran Treffinger dengan pendekatan Open-Ended”. Unnes Journal of Mathematics education, 6(3): 391-399.
Sari, A. K. 2014. “Analisis Karakteristik Gaya Belajar VAK (Visual, Auditorial, Kinestetik) Mahasiswa Pendidikan Informatika Angkatan 2014. Jurnal Ilmiah Edutic, 1(1). ISSN 2407-4489.
Siswono. 2007. Penjenjangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dan Identifikasi Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Dalam Memecahkan dan Mengajukan Masalah Matematika. Disertasi. Tidak dipublikasikan. PPS UNESA Surabaya.