Legal Implications for Home-Based Workers Following the Judicial Review Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/iccle.v6i1.4171Keywords:
Home-based workers, Judicial Review, Legal ImplicationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the laws and regulations governing informal workers, especially home-based workers in Indonesia by examining decision No. 75/PUU-XX/2022 concerning the application for review of Law No. 13 of 2013 regarding Manpower against the 1954 Constitution in the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Understanding the legal status of informal workers in Indonesia is crucial. This research employed a normative legal method using statutory and analytical approaches. Data was collected using the document study method on secondary data, which was then analyzed qualitatively. Based on the research results, it was found that home-based workers are included in the informal sector, but Manpower Law has not yet accommodated them. This is because Indonesian law does not recognize home-based workers in the Job Creation Law or the Manpower Law, as it has not adopted international instruments on home-based workers. However, home-based workers still receive work agreements based on Article 1320 and Article 1338 of the Civil Code and protection in several laws and regulations. According to the Court, the government must specifically regulate home-based workers to accommodate every type of work in Indonesia.
References
Ady Thea DA. (2021). Ada 9 Perubahan UU Ketenagakerjaan Lewat UU Cipta Kerja. Hukum Online. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ada-9-perubahan-uu-ketenagakerjaan-lewat-uu-cipta-kerja-lt6095378ff0690/
Agung Prasetya. (2020). Pengalaman pekerja informal di tengah pandemi Covid-19 di kota Bandung. Komunikasi, Masyarakat Dan Keamanan, 2. https://ejurnal.ubharajaya.ac.id/index.php/KOMASKAM/article/view/300
Aida, N. R. (2022). Daftar lengkap UMP 34 Provinsi di Indonesia tahun 2022. Kompas.Com. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2022/05/18/190000365/daftar-lengkap-ump-34-provinsi-di-indonesia-tahun-2022?page=all
BPS. (2020). Proporsi Lapangan Kerja Informal. Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/indikator/indikator/view_data/0000/data/1166/sdgs_8/1#:~:text=Pekerja informal adalah penduduk yang,dan pekerja keluarga%2Ftak dibayar.
Column, S. (2019). Mengenal siapa mereka pekerja rumahan. Communication.Binus.Ac.Id. https://communication.binus.ac.id/2019/01/03/mengenal-siapa-mereka-pekerja-rumahan/
Gajimu.com. (2023). Seputar kerja rumahan di Indonesia. Gajimu.Com. https://gajimu.com/tips-karir/Tentang-wanita/Pekerja-Rumahan
HAM, K. (2021). Kertas kebijakan tinjauan undang-undang nomor 11 tahun 2020 tentang cipta kerja dan peraturan pelaksanaannya pada klaster ketenagakerjaan terhadap hak atas pekerjaan dan penghidupan yang layak bagi pekerja prakeriat. Komnas HAM. https://www.komnasham.go.id/index.php/publikasi/2022/02/03/141/kertas-kebijakan-tinjauan-atas-undang-undang-nomor-11-tahun-2020-tentang-cipta-kerja-dan-peraturan-pelaksanaannya-pada-klaster-ketenagakerjaan-terhadap-hak-atas-pekerjaan-dan-penghidupan-yang-
Ikmal, N. M., & Noor, M. (2022). Kebijakan pemerintah Indonesia dalam penanganan Covid-19. Jurnal Litbang Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 19(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.36762/jurnaljateng.v19i2.910
ILO. Non-Standard Forms of Employment around the World : Understanding Challenges, Shaping Prospects. First Publ. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2016. https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/non-standard-employment/lang--en/index.htm.
Putra, I Gusti Ngurah Brama Abimayu Rahmanda, and I Ketut Westra. “Jaminan Sosial Bagi Pekeja Di Sektor Informal Sebagai Wujud Pelaksanaan Sila Kelima UUD NRI 1945.” Kertha Desa 9 (2021): 91–101. https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/kerthadesa/article/view/83349.
Solechan, Solechan. “Perlindungan Homeworker Yang Berkerja Secara Putting out System.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 1, no. 4 (November 30, 2018): 386–90. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v1i4.386-390.
Suliantoro, Bernadus Wibowo, and Caritas Woro Murdiati Runggandini. “Konsep Keadilan Sosial Dalam Kebhinekaan Menurut Pemikiran Karen J. Warren.” Jurnal Respons Universitas Katholik Atma Jaya 23, no. 01 (2018): 39–58. https://doi.org/10.22146/bpsi.7399.
Sumadi, Ahmad Fadlil. “Hukum Dan Keadilan Sosial Dalam Perspektif Hukum Ketatanegaraan.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 4 (2016): 849. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1249.
Tim Serikat Pengajar HAM. Membangun Kembali Dengan Lebih Baik: Kajian Pemenuhan Hak Atas Pekerjaan Bagi Kelompok Marginal Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia (Komnas HAM RI), 2023. https://www.komnasham.go.id/index.php/publikasi/2023/05/05/158/membangun-kembali-dengan-lebih-baik.html.
Utami, Tri Rahayu, Naila Amrina, and Maimunah Maimunah. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pekerja Rumahan Yang Bekerja Secara PPutting Out System Melalui Optimalisasi Peran Badan Ssaha Milik Desa.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 2, no. 2 (June 6, 2019): 365–79. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.365-379.
Yani, Ahmad. “Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia: Pendekatan Teori Dan Praktek Konstitusi Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 12, no. 2 (2018): 119. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2018.v12.119-135.
