The Effectiveness of Land Dispute Mediation by the Boyolali Regency Land Office in Resolving Agrarian Disputes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/jal.v3i2.48251Keywords:
Land mediation, agrarian disputes, effectiveness, land office, Boyolali.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of land mediation conducted by the Boyolali Regency Land Office in resolving agrarian disputes. This study uses a socio-legal (empirical) approach, with data collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and document studies. The results indicate that although land mediation is conducted in accordance with applicable regulations, its success rate remains limited. Of the 18 cases mediated between January and December 2025, only 5 cases (27.8%) reached a resolution, 4 cases failed, and 9 cases are still ongoing. Major obstacles include the absence of one of the parties, legal representatives preferring litigation, and low public trust in the mediation process. Nevertheless, mediation is considered a faster, cheaper, and more accessible alternative compared to court proceedings, and remains a valuable mechanism for conflict resolution in agrarian disputes.
References
Abbas, Syahrizal. 2009. Mediation from the Perspectives of Sharia Law, Customary Law, and National Law. Jakarta: Kencana.
Ali, Achmad. 2015. Unveiling Legal Theory and Judicial Theory. Jakarta: Kencana.
Arba, Muhammad. 2021. “Optimizing Mediation in the Resolution of Land Disputes in Indonesia.” Jurnal IUS QUIA IUSTUM 28 (3): 350–368.
Boyolali District Court. 2025. Data on Land Dispute Cases for 2023–2025. Boyolali: Boyolali District Court.
Bunga. 2018. Resolution of Land Disputes Through Mediation at the Land Offices of Yogyakarta City, Sleman Regency, and Bantul Regency. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University.
Dewi, Rika, and Asmarani Ramli. 2023. “Strengthening Mediation in the Resolution of Land Disputes in Indonesia.” Journal of Agrarian Law 5 (2): 120–135.
Fuady, Munir. 2013. Modern Civil Law. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hadjon, Philipus M. 1987. Legal Protection for the Indonesian People. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Harsono, Boedi. 2008. Indonesian Agrarian Law: History of the Formation of the Basic Agrarian Law. Jakarta: Djambatan.
IRAC (Indonesian Research and Analysis Center). 2022. “Resolution of Agrarian Disputes in Indonesia.” Journal of Social Law 4 (1): 55–70.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2016. Legal Research. Jakarta: Kencana.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. 2010. Indonesian Civil Procedure Law. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Nasution, Bahder Johan. 2008. Research Methods in Legal Science. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Nugroho, Susanti Adi. 2015. Dispute Resolution Through Mediation. Jakarta: Prenadamedia.
Parlindungan, A.P. 1999. Land Registration in Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. 2009. Law Enforcement: A Sociological Review. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Republic of Indonesia. 1999. Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Jakarta: State Secretariat.
Republic of Indonesia. 2011. Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency No. 3 of 2011 on the Management, Review, and Handling of Land Cases. Jakarta: BPN RI.
Republic of Indonesia. 2016. Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency No. 11 of 2016 on the Resolution of Land Cases. Jakarta: ATR/BPN.
Republic of Indonesia. 2020. Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/BPN No. 21 of 2020 on the Handling and Resolution of Land Cases. Jakarta: ATR/BPN.
Santoso, Urip. 2012. Agrarian Law: A Comprehensive Study. Jakarta: Kencana.
Setiawan, Agus. 2020. “The Effectiveness of Mediation in Resolving Land Disputes at the Tegal City Land Office.” National Land Journal 10 (1): 45–60.
Soekanto, Soerjono. 2014. Factors Influencing Law Enforcement. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sumardjono, Maria S.W. 2001. Land Policy Between Regulation and Implementation. Jakarta: Kompas.
Suyud Margono. 2010. ADR and Arbitration: Institutionalization Process and Legal Aspects. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Sylvia, Rina. 2018. “The Effectiveness of Mediation in Resolving Land Disputes in Medan City.” Journal of Legal Science 8 (2): 77–89.
Tjiptono, Fandy. 2011. Research and Evaluation Methods. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Usman, Rachmadi. 2012. Mediation in Court: Theory and Practice. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Widjaja, Gunawan. 2003. Alternative Dispute Resolution. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Wignjosoebroto, Soetandyo. 2002. Law: Paradigms, Methods, and the Dynamics of Its Issues. Jakarta: Elsam.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
48251Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Surya Wira (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Indonesian Journal of Agrarian Law are made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). By submitting a manuscript to the journal, authors agree to the terms outlined below regarding the distribution, use, and sharing of their work.
