Development of E-LKPD Mathematics Using Liveworksheets with Malay Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v16i1.16196Keywords:
E-LKPD, Malay, Liveworksheets, Problem Solving AbilityAbstract
The combination of technology with local culture in this case the Malay context is a new thing in this study. One of the targets to be achieved is in the ability category, where learning independence, student mathematics, adaptive reasoning, student involvement, science literacy, assignments, mathematical connections, and teacher professionalism are presented in this study. A teacher must be the center of change in improving learning, how a teacher is able to utilize the context to design learning, where the use of context is not only as a learning ceremony but utilizes the context as a whole in an effort to build students' mathematical knowledge and also students' understanding of mathematical concepts. Education must also undergo a transformation in the Society 5.0 era. especially in mathematics learning, it is expected that learning can run in a blended learning manner. This study produces the objectives of E-LKPD mathematics using Liveworksheets with a Malay Context that is valid, practical and has a potential effect on mathematical problem solving abilities. This type of research is development research, which involves students at the junior high school level. The data for this study were obtained from the results of observations, interviews and tests. The results of this study are to produce a valid and practical Liveworksheets-based mathematics E-LKPD with a Malay context and the development of Liveworksheets-based mathematics E-LKPD with a Malay context in junior high schools that has been developed has a potential effect on students' problem-solving abilities based on the analysis that has been obtained, namely 67 students, 9 students have problem-solving abilities with a very high category, 19 students have problem-solving abilities with a high category, 18 have problem-solving abilities with a moderate category, 10 participants have problem-solving abilities with a category, 11 students have problem-solving abilities with a very low category. Then the average mathematical problem solving is 64.05, meaning that the developed E-LKPD has a moderate potential effect. This study contributes to the development of mathematics E-LKPD using liveworksheets that are more effective in overcoming students' difficulties in learning mathematics.
Abstrak
Perpaduan teknologi dengan budaya lokal dalam hal ini konteks melayu menjadi novelty dari penelitian ini. salah satu target yang akan digapai yaitu pada kategori kemampuan, dimana kemandirian belajar, matematis siswa, penalaran adaptif, keterlibatan siswa, literasi sains, penugasan, koneksi matematika serta keprofesionalan guru dimunculkan dalam penelitian ini. Seorang guru harus menjadi center perubahan dalam perbaikan pembelajaran, bagaimana seorang guru mampu memanfaatkan konteks untuk mendesain pembelajaran, dimana penggunaan konteks tidak hanya sebagai ceremony pembelajaran tetapi memanfaatkan konteks secara utuh dalam upaya membangun pengetahuan matematik siswa dan juga pemahaman konsep matematika siswa. Pendidikan juga harus mengalami transformasi di era Society 5.0. khususnya pada pembelajaran matematika diharapkan pembelajaran dapat berjalan secara blended learning. Penelitian ini bertujuan menghasilkan E-LKPD matematika menggunakan Liveworksheets dengan Konteks Melayu yang valid, praktis dan memiliki efek potensial terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian pengembangan, yang melibatkan siswa di tingkat sekolah menengah pertama. Data penelitian ini diperoleh dari hasil observasi, wawancara dan tes. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu Menghasilkan E-LKPD matematika berbasis Liveworksheets dengan konteks Melayu yang valid dan prkatis serta Pengembangan E-LKPD matematika berbasis Liveworksheets dengan konteks Melayu di SMP yang dikembangkan memiliki efek potensial terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah peserta didik berdasarkan analisis yang telah diperoleh yaitu 67 peserta didik, 9 peserta didik memiliki kemampuan pemecahan masalah dengan kategori sangat tinggi, 19 peserta didik memiliki kemampuan pemecahan masalah dengan kategori tinggi, 18 peserta didik memiliki kemampuan pemecahan masalah dengan kategori sedang, 10 peserta didik memiliki kemampuan pemecahan masalah dengan kategori rendah, 11 peserta didik memiliki kemampuan pemecahan masalah dengan kategori sangat rendah. Kemudian rata-rata pemecahan masalah matematis sebesar 64,05 artinya E-LKPD yang dikembangkan memiliki efek potensial sedang. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi untuk pengembangan E-LKPD matematika menggunakan liveworksheets yang lebih efektif dalam mengatasi kesulitan siswa dalam belajar matematika.
Downloads
References
Adams, W. K., & Wieman, C. (2015). Analyzing the many skills involved in solving complex physics problems. American Journal of Physics, 83(5), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4913923
Alvin, B. (2022). Upgrading the Problem-Solving Experiences of the Primary Students Using an Online Singapore Mathematics Platform. American Journal of Education and Technology, 1(3), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v1i3.750
Andriyani, N., Hanafi, Y., Safitri, I. Y. B., & Hartini, S. (2020). Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Lkpd Live Worksheet Untuk Meningkatkan Keaktifan Mental Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Tematik Kelas Va. Prosiding Pendidikan Profesi Guru, September, 122–130.
Arteaga-Martínez, B., MacÍas, J., & Pizarro, N. (2020). Representation in the solution of mathematical problems: An analysis of metacognitive strategies of secondary education students. Uniciencia, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.15359/ru.34-1.15
Asmaryadi, A. I., Darniyanti, Y., & Nur, N. (2022). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar e-LKPD Berbasis MIKiR dengan Mengunakan Live Worksheets pada Muatan IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3521
Barana, A., Boetti, G., & Marchisio, M. (2022). Self-Assessment in the Development of Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills. Education Sciences, 12(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12020081
Cardellini, L. (2014). Problem solving: How can we help students overcome cognitive difficulties. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.121
Crooks, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2014). Defining and measuring conceptual knowledge in mathematics. In Developmental Review (Vol. 34, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2014.10.001
English, L. D. (2023). Ways of thinking in STEM-based problem solving. ZDM, 55(7), 1219–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01474-7
Ezeddine, G., Souissi, N., Masmoudi, L., Trabelsi, K., Puce, L., Clark, C. C. T., Bragazzi, N. L., & Mrayah, M. (2023). The problem-solving method: Efficacy for learning and motivation in the field of physical education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041252
Febrian, F., & Astuti, P. (2018). The RME principles on geometry learning with focus of transformation reasoning through exploration on Malay woven motif. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(Special Issue). https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10254a
Fitriani, N., Hidayah, I. S., & Nurfauziah, P. (2021). Live Worksheet Realistic Mathematics Education Berbantuan Geogebra: Meningkatkan Abstraksi Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Segiempat. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 5(1). https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v5i1.4526
Frank, B., Simper, N., & Kaupp, J. (2017). Formative feedback and scaffolding for developing complex problem solving and modelling outcomes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(4), 552–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1299692
Greiff, S., Fischer, A., Stadler, M., & Wüstenberg, S. (2014). Assessing complex problem-solving skills with multiple complex systems. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(3), 356–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.989263
Gyaurov, D., Fabricatore, C., & Bottino, A. (2022). Features of Entertainment Digital Games for Learning and Developing Complex Problem-Solving Skills: A Protocol for a Systemic Review. In International Journal of Qualitative Methods (Vol. 21). SAGE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221128491
Hadi, S. (2015). TINJAUAN METODOLOGI INDOMATH STUDY. Jurnal Kependidikan Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v33i1.7261
Hafizi, M. H. M., & Kamarudin, N. (2020). Creativity in Mathematics: Malaysian Perspective. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081609
Haluti, A., Uno, H. B., Abbas, N., Djakaria, I., Badu, S. Q., Arwildayanto, A., & Djapri, N. (2022). SURVEY MEDIA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIAK DI SEKOLAH DASAR. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN GLASSER, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.32529/glasser.v6i1.1610
Jufriadi, A., Huda, C., Aji, S. D., Pratiwi, H. Y., & Ayu, H. D. (2022). ANALISIS KETERAMPILAN ABAD 21 MELALUI IMPLEMENTASI KURIKULUM MERDEKA BELAJAR KAMPUS MERDEKA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v7i1.2482
Kesumawati, N. (2012). Meningkatkan kemampuan pemahaman matematis siswa SMP melalui pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 30–44.
Khasanah, U., Rahayu, R., & Ristiyani, R. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Kelas IV Materi Bangun Datar Berdasarkan Teori Polya. Didaktika, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/didaktika.v1i2.36538
Kolar, V. M., & Hodnik, T. (2021). Mathematical literacy from the perspective of solving contextual problems. In European Journal of Educational Research (Vol. 10, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.1.467
Kristantini, R. (2022). ANALISIS KESULITAN MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR BERBASIS ETNOMATEMATIKA BENGKULU SELATAN. Sepren, 4(01). https://doi.org/10.36655/sepren.v4i01.803
Lioba, T., Yuniasih, N., & Nita, C. I. R. (2021). Pengembangan E-LKPD Berbasis Aplikasi Liveworksheets pada Materi Volume Bangun Ruang Kelas V SDN Kebonsari 4 Malang. Seminar Nasional PGSD UNIKAMA, 5(1).
Lubis, F. F., Nurdin, E., & Fitri, I. (2023). Pembelajaran Ethno-RME Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa. Juring (Journal for Research in Mathematics Learning), 6(3), 277–284.
Macalalag, A., Johnson, J., & Lai, M. (2019). How do we do this: learning how to teach socioscientific issues. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09944-9
Mariñoso, P. E., Ruano, Á. M., & Jareño, I. M. (2024). Mathematics and Language: A One-to-One Correspondence in Bilingual Environments. Education Sciences, 14(3), 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030328
Mevarech, Z. R., & Kramarski, B. (2014). Critical Maths for Innovative Societies. In Educational research and innovation. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264223561-en
Montague, M., Warger, C., & Morgan, T. H. (2000). Solve It! Strategy Instruction to Improve Mathematical Problem Solving. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1207/sldrp1502_7
Mubharokh, A. S., Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., & Susanti, E. (2022). KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS PESERTA DIDIK PADA MATERI PENYAJIAN DATA MENGGUNAKAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA REALISTIK INDONESIA (PMRI). JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v5i2.9866
Mudrika, P. A., Syaifuddin, M., & Azmi, R. D. (2024). HOTS Critical Thinking and Math Problem-Solving Skills on Wordwall-Assisted Problem-Based Learning Model. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(3), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.3.835
Nianti, R. E., Haryati, S., & Herdini. (2022). Pengembangan E-LKPD Berbasis Connecting, Organizing, Reflecting, Extending Berbantuan LiveWorksheets pada Pokok Bahasan Asam Basa. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Universitas Riau, 7(1).
Nirmayani, L. H. (2022). Kegunaan Aplikasi Liveworksheet Sebagai LKPD Interaktif Bagi Guru-Guru SD di Masa Pembelajaran Daring Pandemi Covid 19. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.55115/edukasi.v3i1.2295
Oktavia, F. T. A., & Qudsiyah, K. (2023). Problematika Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Di SMKN 2 Pacitan. JURNAL EDUMATIC, 4(1 SE-Articles), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.21137/edumatic.v4i1.685
Popova, Y., Abdualiyeva, M., Torebek, Y., Yelshibekov, N., & Omashova, G. (2022). Improving the effectiveness of senior graders’ education based on the development of mathematical intuition and logic: Kazakhstan’s experience. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.986093
Rahat, R., Mahmood, Z., & Shah, N. H. (2020). Analyses of Life Skills Development Practices in Secondary Schools of Islamabad. Global Social Sciences Review, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(v-ii).11
Rahman, M. (2019). 21st Century Skill “Problem Solving”: Defining the Concept. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.34256/ajir1917
Rahmawati, V. R. (2021). pengembangan lkpd interaktif menggunakan live worksheets untuk membangun minat belajar siswa pada materi transformasi geometri/vita rahmawati. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Rismawati, M., Rahmawati, P., & Rindiani, A. B. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS). Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i2.1444
Rohana, S., & Grafika, M. (2009). Hubungan antar suku bangsa di kota Pangkalpinang. Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan.
Sadykova, A., Iskakova, M., Ismailova, G., Orazgaliyeva, Z., Kozhakhmetova, E., & Nurtazina, Z. (2025). Impact of HOT Instruction on Knowledge and Comprehension in Chemistry and Biology for Middle School Students. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(1), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n1a1290
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1980). Teaching Problem-Solving Skills. American Mathematical Monthly, 87(10), 794–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1980.11995155
Sembiring, N. B., Asmin, A., & Surya, E. (2019). Development of Mathematics Learning Tools Through Geogebra-Aided Problem Based Learning To Improve Solving Capability Mathematical Problems of High School Students. Proceedings of the 5th Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership (AISTEEL 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-19.2019.45
Singh, C., Maries, A., Heller, K., & Heller, P. (2023). Instructional Strategies that Foster Effective Problem-Solving. 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1063/9780735425477_017
Supardi, L., Zayyadi, M., Lanya, H., Hasanah, S. I., & Hidayati, S. N. (2021). Commognitive Analysis Of Students’ Errors In Solving High Order Thinking Skills Problems. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 12(6), 950–961. https://doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i6.2373
Suryawati, S. (2021). The Implementation of Problem Based Instruction Model to Improve Problem Solving Ability on Mechanical Wave Material at SMA Negeri 3 Banda Aceh. Asian Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.24815/ajse.v3i1.19790
Syaiful, S., Kamid, K., Muslim, M., & Huda, N. (2020). Identifiying of problem solving abilities in Mathematics among Junior High School students. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(2), 176–182. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v14i2.14861
Szabó, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Gunčaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of Problem-Solving Strategies in Mathematics Education Supporting the Sustainability of 21st-Century Skills. Sustainability, 12(23), 10113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113
Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and conducting formative evaluations: Improving the quality of education and training. In Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluations. Kogan Page.
Tobón, S., & Luna-Nemecio, J. (2021). Complex Thinking and Sustainable Social Development: Validity and Reliability of the COMPLEX-21 Scale. Sustainability, 13(12), 6591. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126591
Voskoglou, M. G., & Buckley, S. (2012). Problem Solving and Computational Thinking in a Learning Environment. ArXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1212.0750
Wedell, M., & Malderez, A. (2013). Understanding Language Classroom Contexts: The starting point for change. In Understanding Language Classroom Contexts: The Starting Point for Change. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct064
Xu, Z., & Qi, C. (2022). Middle school students’ mathematical problem-solving ability and the influencing factors in mainland China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1042315
Yusra, D., & Saragih, S. (2016). The Profile of Communication Mathematics and Students’ Motivation by Joyful Learning-based Learning Context Malay Culture. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.9734/bjesbs/2016/25521
Zulkardi. (2006). Formative evaluation: what, why, when, and how. http://www.oocities.org/zulkardi/books.html
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Article ID
16196Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
