Mathematical literacy ability on project based learning model with RME approach assisted by schoology
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Abstract
Mathematical literacy skills need to be improved so that students are able to solve mathematical problems correctly. This study aims to (1) To find out the mathematical literacy abilities of students in the PjBL model with the RME approach assisted by media, Schoology can achieve classical completeness or more; (2) To find out which one is better between the average mathematical literacy abilities in the PjBL model, the RME approach is assisted by Schoology's media in the experimental class and the DL model's Scientific approach in the control class. The population in this study was VII grade students in a school in the city of Semarang. This research is quantitative research. Sampling is done by random sampling technique. The results of the study showed that using the PjBL model of the RME approach assisted by Schoology in achieving classical completeness, and learning the PjBL with the RME approach assisted by the Schoology media in the experimental class had an average mathematical literacy ability compared to DL learning Scientific approaches in the control class.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
References
Biswas, S. 2013. Schoology-supported classroom management: a curriculum review. Northwest Journal of Teacher Education, 11(2): 187-195.
De Lange, J. 1987. Mathematics, Insight and Meaning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Depdiknas. 2003. Undang-undang RI No 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Grant, M.M., 2002. Getting A Grip On Project-Based Learning: Theory, Cases and Recommendations. Meridian: A MiddleSchool Computer Technologies Journal, 5(1): 116-32.
Harefa, A.O. 2013. Penerapan Teori Pembelajaran Ausubel dalam Pembelajaran. Warta Dharmawangsa, 36: 42-55.
Mahendra, I.W.E. 2017. Project Based Learning Bermuatan Etnomatematika dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 6(1): 106-114.
Mulyono &D. I. Lestari. 2016. The Analysis Of Mathematical Literacy And Self-Efficacy Of Students In Search, Solve, Create, And Share (SSCS) Learning With A Contextual Approach. Proceeding of ICMSE, 3(1), M-159.
Nurfitriyanti, M. 2016. Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Formatif, 6(2): 149-160.
OECD. 2013. PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. OECD publishing.
OECD. 2017. PISA for Development Assessment and Analytical Framework Reading, Mathematics and Science. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Rifa’i, A. & C. T. Anni. 2011. Psikologi Pendidikan. Semarang: UNNES PRESS
Stacey, K. (2014). The PISA view of mathematical liter¬acy in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Educa¬tion, 2(02), 95-126.
Sudjana. 2005. Metoda Statistika. Bandung: PT. Tarsito Bandung.
Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Surya, A.P. 2018. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning (Pjbl) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Dan Kreatifitas Siswa Kelas III SD Negeri Sidorejo Lor 01 Salatiga. Jurnal Pesona Dasar, 6(1): 41-54.
Thomas, J.W. 2000. A Review of Research on Project Based Learning. California: The Autodesk Foundation.
TIMSS. 2015. Highlights From TIMSS and TIMSS Advanced 2015. Washington. Institute of Education Sciences.
Wardono.2014. The Realistic Learning Model with Character Education and PISA Assesment to Improve Mathematics Literacy.International Journal of Education and Research.7(2):361-372.
Wardono. 2017. Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan. Semarang: FMIPA UNNES Press.
Wena, M. 2011. Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Zulkardi. 2002. Developing a Learning Environment on Realistic Mathamatics
Education for Indonesian Student Teachers. Thesis. University of Twente,
Enschede, the Netherlands.