Speedy Trial in Election Crimes in Indonesia: Between Judicial Efficiency and Evidentiary Integrity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v10i2.29811

Keywords:

Election Crime, Evidence, Justice, Speedy Trial

Abstract

Speedy trials in regional election criminal cases are essential for maintaining democratic integrity, but they raise concerns about balancing efficiency with substantive justice. This study examines the implications of implementing speedy trial principles on evidence quality, access to justice, human rights protection, and judicial system integrity through normative legal analysis of primary sources. The research reveals that accelerated judicial processes create tensions between procedural speed and thoroughness, potentially compromising the examination of evidence, disadvantaging resource-limited defendants, and risking due process violations. The findings demonstrate that expedited timelines may undermine comprehensive legal reasoning in judicial decisions. A balanced framework is essential to achieve both procedural efficiency and substantive justice in electoral criminal proceedings.

Author Biographies

  • Riezka Eka Mayasari, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

    She was born in Makassar on May 23, 1984. Currently, she holds dual responsibilities as a lecturer and Dean at the Faculty of Law, University of Sembilanbelas November Kolaka. In her capacity as an academic and faculty leader, Riezka not only actively participates in the teaching process but also consistently produces scholarly writings. Her research focus encompasses various aspects of civil law, particularly in the fields of contract design, agrarian law, mining law, and business law. Her leadership as Dean is also crucial in enhancing the academic quality and reputation of the Faculty of Law at the University of Sembilanbelas November Kolaka, making it a high-quality and competitive institution for legal education.

  • La Ode Awal Sakti, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

    He was born in Raha on October 1, 1991. He is currently dedicated to serving as a lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Sembilanbelas November University, Kolaka. As a criminal law expert, he is not only an active teacher but also a productive writer and publisher of scientific articles in the field of law. His primary areas of expertise include criminal law, criminal procedure law, general offences, election offenses, and the juvenile justice system. Additionally, La Ode Awal Sakti regularly participates in various activities as a resource person, providing insights and a deep understanding of criminal law issues. Through his academic role and practical involvement, he makes significant contributions to the development of legal science, particularly in enriching the knowledge of criminal law issues among students and the public.

  • Siti Hudzaifah Miftahul Jannah, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

    She was born in Barru on July 20, 1995, and currently serves as a lecturer in criminal law at the Faculty of Law, November 19 University, Kolaka. In addition to her academic role as a teacher, she is also active in writing scholarly articles and contributing to social activities through her volunteer work with the Friends of Witnesses and Victims (SSK) in the South Sulawesi community. Her research focuses on criminal law, criminal procedural law, victimology, and the protection of the rights of women and children, which are her primary areas of interest in teaching and social activities.

  • Yahyanto, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka

    He was born in Wundulako on June 6, 1982, is currently serving as a lecturer at the Faculty of Law at Sembilanbelas November University in Kolaka. He is recognized for his active involvement in teaching and his prolific writing of scientific articles. Previously, his dedication to the institution was demonstrated by his role as Dean of the Faculty of Law at USN Kolaka. His expertise is diverse, encompassing criminal law, criminal procedure law, environmental criminal law, corruption offenses, and mining offenses. In addition to his role in academia, Yahyanto is also a prominent figure in law enforcement, frequently providing expert testimony in various criminal cases.

  • Eduardo Andres Cellis, PhD Student, University of Deusto

    He is currently pursuing a doctoral (PhD) degree at the University of Deusto, Spain. As a dedicated young researcher, he engages in his field of study with a focus on developing knowledge and making academic contributions relevant to contemporary challenges.

References

Achmad, Yulianto and Fajar, Mukti. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2013.

Ahmad, Rosman. Penyidik Sentra Gakkumdu. Kolaka, 2024.

Ante, Susanti. “Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Acara Pidana.” Lex Crimen 2, no. 2 (2013) https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/1544.

Arbani, Tri Suhendra. “Pemenuhan Unsur Keadilan Dalam Pembuktian Perselisihan Hasil Pemilihan Umum Pilpres Dengan Konsep Spedy Trial.” Call For Paper Evaluasi Pemilu Serentak 2019 Bidang Evaluasi Aspek Hukum Pemilu (2019). www.Journal.kpu.go.id.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Peradilan Etik Dan Etika Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.

Baharita. “Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah Undang-Undang Pemilukada.” Jurnal Legalitas 1, no. 2 (2023): 30-49. https://doi.org/10.58819/jurnallegalitas(jle).v1i2.

Chazawi, Adami. Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Vol. 1. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.

Dony Irawan, Anang and Umar Sholahudin. “Analisis Penegakan Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia.” Jurnal of Citizenship Virtues 4, no. 2 (2024): 848-857. https://doi.org/10.37640/jcv.v4i2.2082.

Fajar, Mukti and Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2013.

Fatmawati. Ketua Bawaslu Kabupaten Kolaka. Kolaka, 2024.

Firman, Al. Reyland Silverius Sinaga and Reh Bungana Br PA. “Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Negara 1, no.4 (2023): 227-236. https://doi.org/10.55606/birokrasi.v1i4.746.

Hasuri. “Sistem Peradilan Pidana Berkeadilan melalui Pendekatan Kontrol dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum.” Ajudikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 2 (2019): 167-184. https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v3i2.1879.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka, 2014.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.

Lamintang, P.A.F. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1997.

Masyhar, Ali, Rohadhatul Aisy, Akhmedova Mehrinigor Bahodirovna, and Gaini Mukhanova. “Legitimacy of Social Justice in the Terrorism Regulations: Insight from Several Countries.” Bestuur 12, no. 1 (2024): 23–48. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v12i1.78576.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2003.

Nasution, Bahder Johan. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2008.

Nur, Fuad. Lade Sirjon and La Ode Muhamad Sulihin. “Akses Keadilan Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 3, no. 5 (2023): 7588-7603. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v3i5.

Peraturan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Nomor 9 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Nomor 8 Tahun 2020 tentang Penanganan Pelanggaran Pemilihan Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur, Bupati dan Wakil Bupati, serta Wali Kota dan Wakil Wali Kota.

Peraturan Bersama Ketua Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia, Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia dan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor: 5 Tahun 2020, Nomor: 1 Tahun 2020, Nomor: 14 Tahun 2020 Tentang Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu Pada Pemilihan Gubernur dan Wakil Gubernur, Bupati dan Wakil Bupati, Serta Walikota dan Wakil Wali Kota.

Rozi, Fachrul. “Sistem Pembuktian Dalam Proses Persidangan Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Yuridis Unaja 1, no. 2 (2018): 19-33. DOI: 10.5281/jyu.v1i2.486.

Sumardjono, Maria SW. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2014.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Widyawati, Anis, Didik Purnomo, Heru Setyanto, Leony Sondang Suryani, and Fitha Ayun Lutvia Nitha. “Strengthening the Correctional System through Electronic Supervision of Prisoners: A Comparative Legal Study for Reforming Indonesia’s Penitentiary Law.” Jurnal Hukum Novelty 16, no. 2 (2025): 262–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26555/jhn.v16i2.30503.

Widyawati, Anis, Ridwan Arifin, Rohadhotul Aisy, Shofriya Qonitatin Abidah, and Heru Setyanto. “Supervision in Integrated Justice: Legal Reform and Constructive Enforcement in the Criminal Justice System.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 5, no. 2 (2024): 433–58. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.vol5i2.3886.

Wijaya, Hizkia Andhitya and Muhammad Rustamaji. “Urgensi Pembuktian Dalam Persidangan Tindak Pidana Elektronik.” Jurnal Verstek 11, no. 3 (2023): 525-530. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v11i3.73615.

Wingo, Barker v. “Supreme Court of the United States,” 1972. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/407/514/.

Yardi, Novry, Otong Rosadi, and Iyah Faniyah. “Tindak Pidana Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Tahun 2020.” Jurnal Sakato Ekasakti Law Review 3, no. 1 (2024): 10–21. https://doi.org/10.31933/8dhk8m28.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-08

Article ID

29811

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (November, 2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Riezka Eka Mayasari, La Ode Awal Sakti, Siti Hudzaifah Miftahul Jannah, Yahyanto, Eduardo Andres Cellis (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Speedy Trial in Election Crimes in Indonesia: Between Judicial Efficiency and Evidentiary Integrity. (2025). Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies, 10(2), 953-984. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v10i2.29811