Formulation Policy of Weekend Detention In Indonesia Criminal Law Reform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v5i1.36346Keywords:
Penal Policy; Weekend DetentionAbstract
The purpose of this study is to explain and describe how the formulation policy of weekend detention in Indonesia's positive law and how the formulation policy of weekend detention in the Indonesian criminal law reform in the future (ius constituendum). This research uses normative juridical method of research which is legal research conducted by examining the library material in the form of secondary data such as law or library material as well as other documents that support and data retrieval technique used is library research techniques and analysis of data used is interactive analysis model. The results showed that (1) criminal formulation policy the weekend detention in Indonesia's positive law of the arrangement in the correctional Institution is not regulated about the policy of weekend detention. However, in Indonesian positive law formulation has an assimilation program which is one of the programs in the actual criminal implementation almost resembles a weekend detention system. (2) The policy formulation of the weekend detention in the renewal of Indonesian criminal law (penal policy) can be done by the study of the law comparative countries such as France, Portugal, Vanuatu, Queensland and New South Wales that have implemented a relatively advanced prison system that is the weekend detention. The formulation of weekend detention that is expected to be valid in Indonesia in the future is to develop it firmly in the draft Penal code and paste it in article 65 the Draft Penal code or if the government is about to arrange codification in the law of criminal implementation, the weekend detention is entered in one of the types of criminal sanctions.
References
Arief, B. N. (2000). Kebijakan Legislatif dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan dengan Pidana Penjara. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Arief, B. N. (2011). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Hamja. (2015). Model Pembinaan Narapidana Berbasis Masyarakat (Community Based Corrections) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Mimbar Hukum, 27(3), 456.
Lamintang & Theo. (2017). Hukum Penitensier Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Maskur. (2018). Deradikalisasi Dini Pelaku Teror. Retrieved from suaramerdeka website: https://www.suaramerdeka.com/smcetak/baca/84267/deradikalisasi-dini-pelakuteror
Masyhar, A. (2008). Pergulatan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Ranah Tatanan Sosial. Semarang: UNNES PRESS.
Mulyadi, L. (2012). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana Perspektif, Teoritis, dan Praktis. Bandung: PT Alumni.
Nawawi Arief, B. (2013). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Palete, M. S. (2014). Implementasi Pembinaan Narapidana dalam Tahap Asimilasi di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas II A Maros. Universitas Hasanuddin.
Prakoso, D. (1988). Hukum Penitensier di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 022/PUU-III. Putusan M. , (2005).
Soerjono Soekanto & Mamudji. (2014). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Utomo, L. J. (2016). Pidana Kerja Sosial sebagai Alternatif Pidana Penjara Jangka Pendek dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana (Penal Reform) di Indonesia. Jurnal Universitas Sebelas Maret, 46.
Widyawati, A. (2018). Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Hukum Penitensier. Semarang: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Widyawati, A. (2020). Advocate as Law Enforcer in the Implementation of E-Court. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 11(4), 441.
