Analogical Reasoning of Sensing and Intuition Personality Student in Solving Proportion Problem: Two-Variable into Three-Variable Direct Proportion Word Problem

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15294/tey38g29

Keywords:

Analogical Reasoning, Sensing and Intuition, Proportion

Abstract

Students' analogical reasoning based on sensing and intuition is a topic that has yet to be studied. Specifically, there is a need to explore how these two personalities types process information and apply analogical reasoning to solve proportional problems. The research aims to describe the reasoning process based on students' personalities, especially as a first step in implementing more effective and tailored teaching. The type of research used is descriptive qualitative. The research involved four students, two with sensing personalities and two with intuition personalities, who were selected from a group of 32 seventh grade (A) students at SMP Negeri 3 Ambulu, Jember, Indonesia. Selecting four students allows the researcher to explore how students with sensing and intuition personalities use analogical reasoning. The selected subjects embody both personality types, guaranteeing the consistency and generalizability of the obtained data in a wider context. The triangulation used is a triangulation technique that compares the results of completing analogical reasoning tests and interviews. The results of this study show that students with sensing and intuition personalities show differences in analogical reasoning on proportion material. Sensing students carry out two stages of analogical reasoning, namely encoding and inferring; they identify all the information in the source and target problems, solve the source problem, and recognize material similarities and the context of snack production. However, they needed help at the mapping and applying stages; focusing on concrete details prevented them from seeing abstract relationships, and thus, they failed to use the concept of solving the source problem to the target problem. Meanwhile, intuition students carry out the four stages of analogical reasoning: encoding, inferring, mapping, and applying. They successfully identified information, concluded the source problem, a problem involving two elements, identified the relationship with the target problem, connected the solution steps from the source problem to the target problem, and applied the proportion concept to a more complex target problem. This research shows that students' analogical reasoning in proportion materials varies depending on their personality type. Therefore, we can potentially use the results of this research as a reference to implement differentiated learning.

Penalaran analogi siswa berdasarkan kepribadian sensing dan intuition merupakan topik yang belum banyak dikaji secara mendalam. Terutama, bagaimana kedua tipe kepribadian ini memproses informasi dan menerapkan penalaran analogi dalam menyelesaikan masalah perbandingan masih menjadi hal yang kurang dieksplorasi. Penelitian bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan proses penalaran berdasarkan kepribadian siswa khususnya pada sebagai langkah awal dalam melaksanakan pengajaran yang lebih efektif dan disesuaikan. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Banyak subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah 4 siswa   dengan rincian 2 siswa kepribadian sensing dan 2 siswa kepribadian intuition yang dipilih dari 32 siswa kelas VIIA SMP Negeri 3 Ambulu. Jember, Indonesia. Memilih empat siswa memungkinkan peneliti untuk mengeksplorasi secara mendalam bagaimana siswa dengan kepribadian sensing dan intuition menggunakan penalaran analogi. Subjek yang dipilih mewakili kedua tipe kepribadian, sehingga data yang diperoleh konsisten dan dapat digeneralisasi dalam konteks yang lebih luas. Triangulasi yang digunakan adalah triangulasi teknik yang membandingkan hasil penyelesaian tes penalaran analogi dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahawa siswa dengan kepribadian sensing dan intuition menunjukkan perbedaan dalam penalaran analogi pada materi perbandingan. Siswa sensing melakukan dua tahap penalaran analogi yaitu encoding dan inferring, mereka mengidentifikasi semua informasi dalam masalah sumber dan target serta menyelesaikan masalah sumber dan mengenali persamaan materi serta konteks produksi snack. Namun, mereka kesulitan pada tahap mapping dan applying, fokus pada detail konkret membuat mereka tidak melihat hubungan abstrak sehingga gagal menerapkan konsep penyelesaian masalah sumber ke masalah target. Sementara, siswa intuition melakukan keempat tahapan penalaran analogi: encoding, inferring, mapping, dan applying. Mereka berhasil mengidentifikasi informasi, menyimpulkan masalah sumber yang merupakan masalah perbandingan dua unsur dan mengidentifikasi keterkaitan dengan masalah target, menghubungkan langkah-langkah penyelesaian dari masalah sumber ke target, dan menerapkan konsep perbandingan ke masalah target yang lebih kompleks. Secara keseluruhan, penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penalaran analogi siswa dalam materi perbandingan bervariasi tergantung pada tipe kepribadian mereka. Oleh karena itu, hasil penelitian ini berpotensi untuk digunakan sebagai referensi dalam menerapkan pembelajaran berdiferensiasi yang mengakomodasi kebeeragaman tipe kepribadian.

Downloads

Author Biographies

References

Angraini, L. M., Larsari, V. N., Muhammad, I., & Kania, N. (2023). Generalizations and analogi-cal reasoning of junior high school viewed from Bruner’s learning theory. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p291-306

Bardach, L., Hübner, N., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., & von Stumm, S. (2023). Personality, intel-ligence, and academic achievement: Charting their developmental interplay. Journal of Per-sonality, 91(6), 1326–1343. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12810

Creswell. (2018). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach a crash course in sta-tistics. Sage Publications.

English, L. D. (2004). Mathematical and Analogical Reasoning of Young Learners. Routledge.

Eskridge, T. (1989). Principles of continuous ana-logical reasoning. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 1(3), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528138908953700

Evans, J. S. B. T. (2019). Reflections on reflection: The nature and function of type 2 processes in dual-process theories of reasoning. Think-ing & Reasoning. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1623071

Francis, L. J., McKenna, U., & Sahin, A. (2020). Ex-ploring Psalm 73:1-10 through sensing and in-tuition: The SIFT approach among Muslim educators. HTS Theological Studies, 76(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v76i3.6093

Gahi, L. J. S., Almagro, R. E., & Sudoy, R. R. (2023). Mathematical problem-solving style and per-formance of students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(1), 1804-1824. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.7011142

Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoret-ical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(83)80009-3

Gentner, D., & Maravilla, F. (2018). Analogical rea-soning. In The Routledge international hand-book of thinking and reasoning (pp. 186–203). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Hardiani, N., & Kristayulita, K. (2023). Analogical Reasoning in Mathematical Theorems. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 7(1), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i1.10783

Keirsey, D. (1998). Please Understand Me II. Prome-theus Nemesis Books Company.

Krıstayulıta, K., Nusantara, T., As’arı, A. R., & Sa’dıjah, C. (2020). Schema of Analogical Reasoning—Thinking Process in Example Analogies Problem. Eurasian Journal of Edu-cational Research, 20(88), 87-104.

Kusumastuti, A. N., Budiyono, & Indriati, D. (2021a). Mathematical internal connection ability based on personality types of sensing and intuiting. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 012093. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012093

Kusumastuti, A. N., Budiyono, & Indriati, D. (2021b). Students’ Mathematical External Connection Ability Based on Personality Types of Sensing Intuition. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1808(1), 012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012051

Lamon, S. J. (2020). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. Routledge.

Lee, A. Y. (1992). Adrienne Y. Lee, “Analogical Rea-soning: A New Look at an Old Problem. Univer-sity of Colorado Institute of Cognitive Sci-ence.

Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for crea-tive and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2

Maharani, I. S. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Ditinjau dari Kepribadian Sensing-Intuitive. AlphaMath : Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v5i1.7347

Makwana, K. (2023). A Study of Sensing (S) and Intuition (N) Personality Characteristics in Se-lected Business School Students in Gujarat State. The Person and the Challenges. The Journal of Theology, Education, Canon Law and Social Studies Inspired by Pope John Paul II, 13(2), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.15633/pch.13216

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Source-book 3 ed. Sage Publications.

Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. (1998). MBTI Manual A Guide To The Development And Use Of The Myers Briggs Type Indicator ( PDFDrive ): Free Down-load, Borrow, and Streaming. Consulting Psy-chologists Press. Inc.

Nainggolan, S. P., Amalia, J., & Silalahi, S. M. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Koneksi Ma-tematis Peserta Del Mathematics dan Sci-ence Competition (DMSC) ditinjau dari Kepribadian Sensing(S)-Intuiting (N). Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 2584–2598. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i3.1671

Nazariah, N., & Authary, N. (2021). Students’ Intui-tion in Solving Mathematics Problems: The Case of High Mathematics Ability and Gender Differences. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 2711–2724. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.1007

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. The National Council of Teach-ers of Mathematics, Inc.

Nugroho, B. E., Usodo, B., & Subanti, S. (2020). Intuition characteristics of junior high school students with rational personality types in solving HOTS mathematical problems. Jour-nal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3), 032082. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032082

Putri, D. F. P., & Masriyah, M. (2022). Profil Pen-alaran Analogi Siswa Dalam Pemecahan Masa-lah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar. MATHEdunesa, 11(1), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n1.p134-144

Rohim, M. F., & Sari, A. F. (2019). Keterampilan siswa memecahkan masalah olimpiade ma-tematika ditinjau dari kepribadian tipe senis-ing dan intuiting. Jurnal Elemen, 5(1), 80.

Sakinah, M., & Hakim, D. L. (2023). Profil Kemam-puan Penalaran Analogi Matematis Siswa SMA Pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Lengkung. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Ma-tematika Inovatif), 6(2), 813–828. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i2.15909

Sternberg, R. J. (1977a). Intelligence, Information Processing, and Analogical Reasoning. Law-rence Erlbaum Associates, Incorporated.

Sternberg, Robert. J. (1977b). Component pro-cesses in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84(4), 353–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.84.4.353

Stevenson, C. E., Resing, W. C., & Heiser, W. J. (2013). Individual differences in the effect of feedback on children’s change in analogical reasoning. AIED Workshops.

Sumarmo, U. (2011). ‪Berpikir Dan Disposisi Matematik: Apa, Mengapa, dan bagaimana dikembangkan pada peserta didik‬. Bandung: FPMIPA UPI, 1-27.

Supratman, S. (2023). Analogical Reasoning Pro-cess Based on The Development Of High Or-der Thinking Skill Prospective Teacher Stu-dents. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 7(3), 83–102.

Susilo, B. (2019). Profile of Mathematical Creative Thinking in Students Type Sensing and Intuit-ing Personality in Resolving Mathematical Problems. Journal of Instructional Development Research, 1(1), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.61193/jidr.v1i1.5

Tieger, P., Barbarra, B., & Kelly, T. (2017). Pribadimu Profesimu. Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.

Tsoukas, H. (1991). The Missing Link: A Transfor-mational View of Metaphors in Organization-al Science. The Academy of Management Re-view, 16(3), 566–585. https://doi.org/10.2307/258918

Utomo, D. P., Amaliyah, T. Z., Darmayanti, R., Us-miyatun, U., & Choirudin, C. (2023). Students’ Intuitive Thinking Process in Solving Geome-try Tasks from the Van Hiele Level. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 7(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i1.11528

Wibisono, A. L. (2023). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Materi Baris dan Deret Aritmatika Berdasarkan Tipe Kepribadian Keirsey Kelas VIII Mts. Negeri 1 Jember Ditinjau dari Tahapan Newman. [Doctoral Dissertation] UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember.

Wijaya, A., Novita, N., & Yulita, H. (2019). MBTI Personality Types for Career Development (SMK Santo Lukas Jakarta). Jurnal Pengabdi-an Dan Kewirausahaan, 3(2), 91-99. https://doi.org/10.30813/jpk.v3i2.1864

Wulandari, H. A., Utami, C., & Mariyam, M. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Analogi Ma-tematis Ditinjau Dari Motivasi Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Kubus dan Balok Kelas IX. JPMI (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia), 6(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.26737/jpmi.v6i2.2676

Downloads

Additional Files

Article ID

9173

Published

2024-08-16

Data Availability Statement

Data is presented in tables written in the article's body. Raw interview data, questionnaires and supporting instrument data are stored in the Google Drive and can be accessed by contacting the Corresponding Author. Access will be granted if the reasons relate to academic and research activities on similar topics. Data applicants must cite this article.