Penal Policy on Digital Defamation: A Comparative Study of Indonesian and Malaysian Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v11i1.34130Keywords:
Penal Policy, Cyber Defamation, Freedom of Expression, IT Law, Comparative Criminal LawAbstract
The expansion of criminal defamation in digital space, particularly under Indonesia’s ITE Law, has raised concerns over disproportionate restrictions on freedom of expression compared to neighboring jurisdictions such as Malaysia. This study aims to examine how Indonesia and Malaysia regulate criminal defamation and to identify key differences in their penal policies. The central issue is whether reliance on criminal law as a primary regulatory instrument leads to disproportionate interference with freedom of expression in both jurisdictions. This research employs a normative juridical method with a comparative law approach, analyzing Article 27A of Law No. 1 of 2024 (ITE Law), the new Indonesian Criminal Code, and Sections 499–502 of the Malaysian Penal Code, complemented by the Defamation Act 1957 and Constitutional Court Decision No. 105/PUU-XXII/2024. The findings indicate three principal differences. Indonesia maintains a broader scope of criminalization with imprisonment as a dominant sanction, whereas Malaysia tends to prioritize civil remedies. Malaysia also demonstrates more developed defenses grounded in public interest. At the same time, Indonesia’s approach remains less structured in distinguishing legitimate criticism from defamation and in translating principles of reputation protection into proportional legal standards. The study concludes that Indonesia’s current framework risks over-criminalization and requires reform to ensure proportionality. Criminal sanctions should be applied as a last resort (ultimum remedium), supported by mandatory mediation and clearer normative boundaries.
References
Amin, Badia. “Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Sosial Berdasarkan Prinsip Restorative Justice.” Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 16, no. 2 (December 2024): 103. https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v16i2.531.
Anugraha, Sony Rizky, and Ahmad Sudiro. “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penghinaan/Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Sosial Berbasis Restorative Justice Di Kepolisian Daerah Kalimantan Tengah.” Morality 9, no. 2 (2023): 305. https://doi.org/10.52947/morality.v9i2.485.
Asis, Asis. “Legal Protection for Defamation Suspects Who Spread Facts on Social Media Reviewed from the ITE Law.” The Journal of Socio-Legal and Islamic Law 3, no. 1 SE-Articles (August 2024): 15–21. https://doi.org/10.30651/jssl.v3i1.23904.
Atmasasmita, Romli. Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Kontemporer. Edited by Edisi revisi. Kencana, 2020.
Bakashmar, Muhammad Rashaad, Noor Inayah Ya’Akub, and Chan Sai Keong. Perspectives in Business, Information & Human Sciences. Kajang, Selangor Darul Ehsan: IKRAM Education Sdn. Bhd. for Infrastructure University Kuala Lumpur, 2024.
DA, Ady Thea. “Mengenali Tiga Model Pertanggungjawaban Platform Digital.” hukumonline.com, n.d.
Ding, Jo-Ann, and Sin Yew New. “COMMENT | Why Guan Eng Shouldn’t Have Been Allowed to Sue Perkasa,” 2024.
Dopo, Gianluca Fredrick Wou, I Nyoman Putu Budiartha, and Ida Ayu Putu Widiati. “Kebebasan Berpendapat Dalam Hubungannya Dengan Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Denpasar Nomor 72/Pid.Sus/2020/PT.Dps).” Jurnal Analogi Hukum 5, no. 2 (2024): 162–66. https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.5.2.2023.162-166.
Emaliawati, Emaliawati. “Defamation in the Digital Age: An Analysis of the Application of Restorative Justice under Indonesian Criminal Law.” Intellectual Law Review (ILRE) 2, no. 1 (2024): 32–45. https://doi.org/10.59108/ilre.v2i1.62.
Ginanjar, Raden P A. “MK Putuskan Pasal Pencemaran Nama Baik Di UU ITE Tidak Berlaku Untuk Pemerintah, Korporasi Dan Kelompok,” 2025.
Global Freedom of Expression. “Attorney General of Malaysia v. Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd.” Global Freedom of Expression, 2021.
Guzman, Chad de. “Malaysia’s Politicians Keep Suing Each Other for Defamation.” TIME, 2023.
Hadi, Adwi Mulyana. “Cyber Crime in Renewing The ITE Law to Realize The Goals of Legal Justice.” Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization 12, no. 1 (April 2024): 49. https://doi.org/10.20961/jolsic.v12i1.85197.
Hamzah, Emir, Susilawati, and M F R Lubis. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Yang Dilakukan Melalui Media Informasi Dan Elektronik.” Jurnal Al-Hikmah 3, no. 4 (2022): 957. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30743/jhah.v3i4.6259.
Handayana, Emi Puasa, Zainal Arifin, and Zico Junius Fernando. “Criminal Penalties in Cyberspace: Between the Development of Digital Democracy and Authoritarianism.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 10, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v10i1.19652.
Hartanto, Hartanto, Cahyono Cahyono, and Yosua Richard Y. “Penerapan Restorative Justice Dalam Kasus Pencemaran Nama Baik Di Media Sosial (Nilai Kearifan Lokal).” TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL 7, no. 2 (July 2023): 211. https://doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v7i2.62085.
Huda, Muhammad Hasbulloh. “Nilai-Nilai Dasar Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Konsep Al-Maqâshid Al-Syarî‘Ah.” MAQASHID Jurnal Hukum Islam 2, no. 1 (November 2018): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.35897/maqashid.v2i1.167.
Husnita, N. “Pembaruan Special Defence Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Elektronik Di Indonesia (Studi Komparasi Dengan Malaysia).” Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 3, no. 7 (2022): 589–608. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v3i7.176.
Indonesia, Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 105/PUU-XXII/2024 tentang pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 (2025).
Kenyon, Andrew T. “Libel and Defamation in Journalism.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.834.
Kirtley, Jane E, and Casey Carmody. “Criminal Defamation: Still ‘An Instrument of Destruction’ in the Age of Fake News.” Journal of International Media & Entertainment Law 8, no. 2 (2020): 192–93.
Masum, Ahmad, and Md Rejab Md Desa. “Media and the Libel Law: The Malaysian Experience.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 155 (November 2014): 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.10.252.
Muhajir, Anton. “Laporan Pemantauan Hak-Hak Digital Triwulan III 2024.” SAFEnet, 2025.
Munir. “Kajian Pasal 27 A UU No. 1 Tahun 2024 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2008 Tentang ITE.” Fundamental: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 13, no. 2 (September 2024): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.34304/jf.v13i2.284.
Nurusshobah, N, M Said, and S Asiah. “Exposure of Disgrace on Social Media from the Qur’anic Perspective: Fazlur Rahman’s Double Movement Study.” Al-Irfani: Journal of Al Qur’anic and Tafsir 4, no. 1 (2023): 16–32. https://doi.org/10.51700/irfani.v4i1.533.
Pramudita, Wahyu Sinta Dewi, and Anis Widyawati. “Transnational Enforcement Through the Indonesia–Singapore Extradition Framework Against Corruption.” Jurnal USM Law Review 8, no. 3 (2025). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i3.13066.
Project, Sinar. “Freedom of Expression in the Digital Space.” Sinar Project, August 2025.
Rahardja, Satria Dwie, and Zainal Arifin Hoesein. “Comparison Of Legal Systems In The Perspective Of Contemporary Issues And Their Application In Indonesia.” International Journal of Social Service and Research 4, no. 12 (December 2024): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v4i12.1149.
Reid, Elspeth. “Defamation and Political Comment in Post-Soviet Russia.” Review of Central and East European Law 38, no. 1 (2013): 1–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/092598812X13274154887222.
Reuters. “Indonesian Court Bans Government, Company from Defamation Complaints.” Reuters, 2025.
———. “Malaysia’s Troubled Ex-PM Ordered to Pay $300,000 to Politician Over Defamatory Remarks,” 2024.
Rositawati, Dian, and et al. Melindungi Ekspresi: Analisis Pidana Dan HAM Putusan Pengadilan Di Indonesia. Jakarta Selatan: LeIP, 2023.
Selviyana. “Perbandingan Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Pidana Islam Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik.” Muqarin Review 2, no. 1 (2023): 62. https://doi.org/10.15408/mr.v2i1.35186.
Sodiqin, Ali. “Legal, Moral, and Spiritual Dialectics in the Islamic Restorative Justice System.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 21, no. 2 (2021): 373.
Sreedharam, Rajini Kumar, and Bavani Ramayah. “Sedition Law and the Bloggers’ Freedom of Expression in Malaysia.” Jurnal Undang-Undang Dan Masyarakat 26, no. 2020 (September 2020): 85–96. https://doi.org/10.17576/juum-2020-26-10.
Sugara, Mareta Bayu. “Tinjauan Fiqh Jinayah Terhadap Pencemaran Nama Baik.” Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial Dan Sains 6, no. 2 (December 2017): 243–54. https://doi.org/10.19109/intelektualita.v6i2.1609.
Sugitanata, Arif, Ahmad Mustakim, L. Hendri Nuriskandar, and Elpipit. “Integrasi Maqashid Syariah Terhadap Sistem Pemerintahan Demokratis Dan Otoriter Di Negara Baru Merdeka.” Al-Balad: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara Dan Politik Islam 3, no. 3 (2023): 167–86.
Surya Atmaja, Putu Oka. “Comparative Study Mekanisme Penyadapan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Dan Inggris.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 8, no. 1 (May 2019): 90. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2019.v08.i01.p07.
Thiru, Steven. “Section 233(1)(a) of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 Creates a Chilling Effect on Freedom of Speech and Expression, and Should Be Repealed,” 2025.
Wah, Wong Chong, and Wong Chun Keat. “Malaysia Media Law Guide: Defamation, Privacy and Data Protection.” Carter-Ruck, August 2025.
Wibowo, Muhtar Hadi, Ali Masyhar Mursyid, and Anis Widyawati. “Progressionism Restorative Justice Policies in Achieving Rehabilitative Criminal Justice.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 9, no. 1 (2024): 117–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v9i1.50292.
Widyawati, Anis, Ade Adhari, and Ridwan Arifin. “Who Executes Justice? Comparative Institutional Paths from Verdict to Prison.” Jambura Law Review 8, no. 1 (2026): 160–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v1i1.31642.
Widyawati, Anis, Zico Junius Fernando, Ridwan Arifin, and Ali Masyhar Mursyid. “Legal Challenges in Criminal Execution of The Environmental Crime Cases in Indonesia: Efforts Toward Criminal Law Reform.” Jambe Law Journal 9, no. 1 (2026): 53–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/k1djt237.
Yunida, Hailen Ike, Ibnu Alwan Saputra, Naufal Muhazzib, and Febriana Istiqomah. “Prasangka Buruk Sebagai Simbol Memakan Daging Bangkai.” Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir Dan Pemikiran Islam 5, no. 3 (2024): 810–23. https://doi.org/10.58401/takwiluna.v5i3.1880.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
34130Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hartanto Hartanto, Syakdiah Syakdiah, Dwi Astuti , Daniil Alimpeev (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










