Additional Punishment for Revocation of Political Rights to Corruption Prisoners in the Purpose of Punishment in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v5i1.36351Keywords:
Revocation; Political Rights; Prisoners; Purpose of PunishmentAbstract
The application of additional punishment of the revocation of political rights in the form of voting and/or voting rights elected in the elections to the corruption convicts was as an attempt to eradicate the extraordinary Corruption of crime and part of severe punishment and a charge of corruption convicts. The purpose of this research, namely: first, to know and analyze the implementation requirements of additional punishment of revocation of political rights to corruption prisoners in the perspective of human rights; Second, to know and analyze the position of additional penalty for the revocation of political rights in the purpose of punishment in Indonesia. The type of research used is normative juridical research with a legal approach, conceptual approach, a case approach approach, and a comparative approach. The results of the study proved that: first, political rights can be classified in the right to freedom of thought and a conscience that is unable to be reduced under any circumstance and attached to the status of citizens. The application of the additional penalty was the act of degrading and dignity of corruption prisoners as citizens because of the impact on the elimination of Rights and the disclosure of political rights of corruption prisoners until its application does not meet the requirements of the restriction on human rights in the perspective of the relative-particulate matter; Secondly, the theory of the goal of punishment in accordance with Indonesian philosophy is correctional which is also a rationality of the implementation of prison sentence as does Law No. 12 of 1995 about Correctional. The position of additional penalty for revocation of political rights is as an instrument of conforming or contrary to the purpose of punishment in Indonesia, namely correctional throughout its application to open an opportunity for the elimination of rights and not accompanied by an attempt to recover the rights that have been revoked.
References
Ali, Z. (2010). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Alkostar, A. (2008). Korupsi Politik di Negara Modern. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Arief, B. N. (2005). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Kencana Prenada Media Grup.
Arief, B. N. (2010). Kebijakan Legislatif dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan dengan Pidana Penjara. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.
Gaffar, J. M. (2012). Politik Hukum Pemilu. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Gaffar, J. M. (2013). Demokrasi dan Pemilu di Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Galih, B. (2019). Divonis Bersalah, Hak Politik Wakil Ketua DPR Taufik Kurniawan Dicabut 3 Tahun. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from
https://nasional.kompas.com/ website: https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2019/07/15/14384031/divonis-bersalah-hakpolitik-wakil-ketua-dpr-taufik-kurniawan-dicabut-3?page=all
Heri CS. (2018). Optimalisasi Hukuman Pencabutan Hak Politik Sebagai Efek Jera. Retrieved October 10, 2019, from https://www.radioidola.com/ website: https://www.radioidola.com/2018/optimalisasi-hukuman-pencabutan-hak-politiksebagai-efek-jera/
Huda, N. (2015). Problematika Ketetapan MPR dalam Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Kaligis, O. C. (2006). Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak Asasi Tersangka, Terdakwa, dan Terpidana. Bandung: PT Alumni.
Kelsen, H. (2006). Teori Umum Tentang Hukum dan Negara (R. Muttaqien, Ed.). Bandung: Nusamedia dan Nuansa.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2016). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Retrieved December 10, 2019, from Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa website: https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2016). Laporan Tahunan KPK 2016. Retrieved from https://www.kpk.go.id/images/Laporan Tahunan KPK 2016 Bahasa Indonesia.pdf
Kristiarso, B. (2018). Pencabutan Hak Politik sebagai Pidana Tambahan dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia. Lex Et Societatis, 6(4), 22.
Leonard, T. (2016). Pembaharuan Sanksi Pidana Berdasarkan Falsafah Pancasila dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Yudisial, 5(2), 476.
Makki, S. (2018). KPK Ingin Semua Polikus Korup Dicabut Hak Politiknya. Retrieved December 18, 2019, from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ website: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20181207110004-12-351841/kpk-inginsemua-politikus-korup-dicabut-hak-politiknya
Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Marzuki, S. (2013). Perspektif Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Yudisia, 6(3), 192.
Matumpo, O. S. (2014). Pembatasan Terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Perspektif Keadaan Darurat. Media Hukum, 21(1), 63.
Miller, A. (2018). Punishing Passion: A Comparative Analysis of Adultery Laws in the United States of America and Taiwan and their Effects on Women. Fordham
International Law Journal, 41(2), 426. Retrieved from https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2694&context=ilj
Muhammad, R. (2011). Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Muladi. (2004). Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat. Bandung: Alumni.
Muladi dan Nawawi Arief. (2005). Teori-teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.
Mulyadi, L. (2012). Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana Perspektif, Teoritis, dan Praktis. Bandung: PT Alumni.
Nawawi Arief, B. (2013). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Palete, M. S. (2014). Implementasi Pembinaan Narapidana dalam Tahap Asimilasi di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas II A Maros. Universitas Hasanuddin.
Sefriani. (2012). Kewenangan Negara Melakukan Pengurangan dan Pembatasan Terhadap Hak Sipil Politik. Jurnal Konstitusi, 1(1), 13.
Setiady, T. (2010). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Penitensier Indonesia. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Susanto, A. F. (2004). Wajah Peradilan Kita (Konstruksi Sosial tentang Penyimpangan, Mekanisme Kontrol, dan Akuntabilitas Peradilan Pidana). Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Tutik, T. T. (2006). Pokok-pokok Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.
