Recognition or Restriction: Dialectics of Customary Criminal Law in the Paradigm of Indigenous Communities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v11i1.41537Keywords:
Pluralism, Customs, Crime, FormalizationAbstract
The recognition of customary law in the New Criminal Code is like a double-edged sword: on one hand, it acknowledges customary law, but on the other, it imposes limitations cloaked in formalism. This study aims to identify customary criminal offenses that are still practiced in indigenous communities and to analyze the perspectives of indigenous communities regarding customary law as the basis for criminal punishment, unlike previous studies that were still conceptual in nature and lacked empirical support. Thus, this study presents an empirical perspective from indigenous communities regarding the recognition of customary criminal law in the New Criminal Code. The approach in this study is socio-legal, employing qualitative and interpretive analysis. The research was conducted using a purposive sampling method in Sembalun Village and Bangket Parak Village through in-depth interviews with traditional leaders and a literature review. This study concludes that the formalization of customary criminal law through local regulations has the potential to weaken its dynamic nature, given that, empirically, customary criminal law in Sembalun Village and Bangket Parak Village continues to evolve in response to the needs, values, and norms of the local community. Traditional leaders have responded positively to the recognition in the New Criminal Code, noting that customary law still holds greater binding power than state law. Therefore, the regulation of customary criminal law should be sufficiently affirmed in the general provisions of the Criminal Code as a guideline for judges in uncovering the living law within the community, without the need for further formalization through local regulations, to maintain a balance between state law and legal pluralism within Indonesian society.
References
Abdullah, Rahmat Hi. “Urgensi Hukum Adat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 9, no. 2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v9no2.595.
Adhari, Ade, Anis Widyawati, I. Wayan P. Windia, Rugun Romaida Hutabarat, dan Neysa Tania. “Customary Delicts of Penglipuran Bali in the Perspective of the Principle of Legality: A Dilemma and Arrangements for the Future.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 6, no. 2 (2021): 411–36. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i2.50555.
Adiasih, Ning, dan Mulya Sarmono. “Overview Pluralism Law: Application Ammatoa Customary Crime Kajang, Bulukumba, South Sulawesi After the New Criminal Code Law.” Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental 18, no. 6 (2024): e05864. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n6-059.
Adinda, Dwiana, Alfah Salam, Ardian Ramadhan, Adam Narendra, Masykuri Anasti, dan Jerry Yanto. “Politik Hukum Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia.” Wathan: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora 1, no. 1 (2024): 12–25. https://doi.org/10.71153/wathan.v1i1.16.
Al Muttaqin, A. Imam, Adriyanto Adriyanto, M. Bashori, dan Marsudi Dedi Putra. “Legal Pluralism in Kalimantan: A Study of the Dual Application of Criminal Law and Customary Law in Dayak Society.” East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research 4, no. 7 (2025): 3289–304. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v4i7.257.
Ardiansyah, Deri, Rayhan Dwi Kurnia, dan Rika Rahayu. “Formulasi RPP Pelaksanaan Pidana Adat sebagai Upaya Harmonisasi Penerapan Hukum Adat guna Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum.” WICARANA 3, no. 1 (2024): 11–22. https://doi.org/10.57123/wicarana.v3i1.64.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Beberapa Aspek Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum Pidana (Menyongsong Generasi Baru Hukum Pidana Indonesia). (Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip, 2007.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru. Jakarta: Kencana-Prenada Media, 2008.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Kumpulan Hasil Seminar Hukum Nasional Ke s.d. ke-VIII dan Konvensi Hukum Nasional 2008 tentang UUD 1945 sebagai landasan konstitusional Grand Design Sistem dan Politik Hukum Nasional. Terbitan Ketiga. Semarang: Pustaka Magister, 2011.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Perkembangan Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Perspektif Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro Semarang, 2016.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. RUU KUHP BARU : Sebuah Restrukturisasi/Rekontruksi Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Cet. 10. Semarang: Pustaka Magister, 2022.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Tujuan dan Pedoman Pemidanaan (Perspektif Pembaharuan & Perbandingan Hukum Pidana). 8 ed. Semarang: Pustaka Magister, 2022.
Arifin, Ridwan. “Legal Development and Globalization: Some Contemporary Issues in Indonesia and Global Context.” Journal of Law and Legal Reform 1, no. 3 (2020): i–iv. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v1i3.38544.
Basrawi, Basrawi. “Kepastian Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Pidana Melalui Hukum Adat Ditinjau Dari Sistem Hukum Nasional.” Al-’Adl 13, no. 1 (2020): 70. https://doi.org/10.31332/aladl.v13i1.1723.
Beni Kharisma Arrasul. “Eksistensi Hukum Pidana Adat dalam Rancangan KUHP: Problematika Asas Legalitas dan Overkriminalisasi.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.
Bix, Brian H. “John Austin and Constructing Theories of Law.” Dalam The Legacy of John Austin’s Jurisprudence, vol. 103, disunting oleh Michael Freeman dan Patricia Mindus. Law and Philosophy Library. Springer Netherlands, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4830-9_1.
Burhanudin, Achmad Asfi. “Eksistensi Hukum Adat di Era Modernisasi.” SALIMIYA: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Keagamaan Islam 2, no. 4 (2021): 96–113. https://doi.org/10.2906/salimiya.v2i4.466.
Efendi, Jonaedi. “Application of Procedural Justice vis-à-vis Substantive Justice in Law Enforcement.” Arena Hukum 17, no. 2 (2024): 270–89. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum2024.01702.3.
Faisal, Faisal, dan Muhammad Rustamaji. “Pembaruan Pilar Hukum Pidana Dalam RUU KUHP.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 10, no. 2 (2021): 291. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p08.
Ferry Fathurokhman. Hukum Pidana Adat Baduy Dan Pembaruan Hukum Pidana. Pertama. Jakarta: Kencana, 2022.
Hanifah Dwi Jayanti. Polemik Hukum Adat Minangkabau yang Terancam Hilang dalam Bayang Regulasi KUHP Nasional. 21 Oktober 2025. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/polemik-hukum-adat-minangkabau-yang-terancam-hilang-dalam-bayang-regulasi-kuhp-nasional-lt68f9dae303a05/?page=3.
Harniwati, Harniwati. “Hukum Adat di Era Modernisasi.” Journal of Global Legal Review 2, no. 1 (2024): 41–52. https://doi.org/10.59963/jglegar.v2i1.328.
Hijriani, M. Yusuf, Winner A. Siregar, dan Sopian. “Perkembangan Teori Penegakan Hukum dalam Perwujudan Fungsi Norma di Masyarakat.” Sultra Research of Law 5, no. 2 (2022): 58–65. https://doi.org/10.54297/surel.v5i2.62.
I Gusti Ketut Sutha. Bunga Rampai Beberapa Aspek Hukum Adat. Pertama. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1987.
I Made Widnyana. Hukum Pidana Adat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT Fikahati Aneska, 2013.
Irmawanti, Noveria Devy, dan Barda Nawawi Arief. “Urgensi Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 2 (2021): 217–27. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i2.217-227.
Junaidi, Muhammad, dan Yoghi Arief Susanto. “Reformulation of Customary Criminal Law in the National Criminal Code Based on the Formation of Legislation.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 7, no. 1 (2025): 43–60. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v7i1.43-60.
Kamil, Renita. “Legal Positivism Influence on Law Enforcement and Judicial Practice in Indonesia.” JUSTISI 11, no. 2 (2025): 542–69. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v11i2.4049.
Komeni, Wirdi Hisroh, dan Ermania Widjajanti. “Ketidaktepatan Penerapan Hukum Pidana Adat dalam Pasal 2 KUHP Baru: Perspektif Teori Kepastian Hukum.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 4, no. 3 (2024): 1051–59. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i3.10586.
Li, Xinyue. “Legal Pluralism.” Dalam International Law, oleh Xinyue Li. Oxford University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199796953-0258.
Masyhar, A., R. Aisy, A. Widyawati, M. A. Maskur, dan A. Murtadho. “Reclaiming the Unwritten: Living Law’s Prospects under Indonesia’s 2023 Penal Reform.” Jambe Law Journal 8, no. 1 (2025): 255–85. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v8i1.502.
Maulana Halim Putra, Rizanizarli Rizanizarli, dan Sulaiman Sulaiman. “The Position of Customary Criminal Law in Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code.” International Journal of Law and Society 2, no. 3 (2025): 170–79. https://doi.org/10.62951/ijls.v2i3.686.
Menski, Werner. “Flying Kites in a Global Sky: New Models of Jurisprudence.” Socio-Legal Review 7, no. 1 (2011): 1. https://doi.org/10.55496/JZEO6754.
Muladi, dan Diah Sulistyani. Catatan Empat Dekade Perjuangan Turut Mengawal Terwujudnya KUHP Nasional (Bagian I,1980-2020). Semarang: Universitas Semarang Press, 2020.
Mulyadi, Lilik. “Eksistensi Hukum Pidana Adat di Indonesia: Pengkajian Asas, Norma, Teori, Praktik dan Prosedurnya.” LITIGASI 17, no. 2 (2016): 3284. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v17i2.138.
Mulyadi, Lilik. Hukum Pidana Adat: Kajian Asas, Teori, Norma, Praktik dan Prosedur. Cet. ke-1. Bandung: Alumni, 2015.
Priel, Dan. “Legal Positivism and Naturalistic Explanation of Action.” Law and Philosophy 43, no. 1 (2024): 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-023-09479-9.
Pujiyono. “Hukum Pidana Adat Sub-Culture Kehidupan Hukum di Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 40, no. 2 (2011): 148–57. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.40.2.2011.158-163.
Putra Jaya, Nyoman Serikat. “Hukum (Sanksi) Pidana Adat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional.” MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM 45, no. 2 (2016): 123. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.2.2016.123-130.
Putra Jaya, Nyoman Serikat. Relevansi Hukum Pidana Adat dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.
Rochaeti, Nur, Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo, Umi Rozah, dan Jihyun Park. “A Restorative Justice System in Indonesia: A Close View from the Indigenous Peoplesâ€TM Practices.” Sriwijaya Law Review, 27 Januari 2023, 87–104. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol7.Iss1.1919.pp87-104.
Rochaeti, Nur, dan Rahmi Dwi Sutanti. “Kontribusi Peradilan Adat Dan Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 47, no. 3 (2018): 198. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.3.2018.198-214.
Rozah, Umi. Fisafat pemidanaan dalam sistem pemidanaan KUHP 2023 (Aplikasi dalam Kebijakan Hukum Pidana). Semarang: Yoga Pratama, 2024.
Rozah, Umi dan Aldi Yudistira. “Penal Policy Analysis of The Formulation of Customary Law in The 2023 KUHP.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 10, no. 1 (2025): 83–114. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v10i1.19939.
Rusdi Antara, G. E., I. Nyoman Budiana, dan I. A. Sadnyini. “Formulation of Customary Criminal Law in Future Criminal Code and Legal Enforcement in Indonesia.” Substantive Justice International Journal of Law 4, no. 2 (2021): 164–81. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.33096/substantivejustice.v4i2.149.
Sambas, Nandang. “Eksistensi Hukum Pidana Adat Dalam Pembentukan Hukum Pidana Nasional.” Syiar Hukum XI, no. 3 (2009): 233–43. https://doi.org/10.29313/sh.v11i3.546.
Shcherbaniuk, O. V., dan A. Z. Manyk. “The Concept of ‘Living Law’ by E. Erhlich from the Point of View of the Specifity of Social Relations in the Globalized World.” Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, no. 4 (September 2023): 652–56. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2023.04.102.
Sholahudin, Umar. Hukum dan Keadilan Masyarakat: Perspektif Kajian Sosiologi Hukum. Cet. 1. Malang: Setara Press, 2021.
Simanjuntak, Jansen Edinata, Mompang L. Panggabean, John Pieris, dan Wiwik Sri Widiarty. “Customary Law and Multiple Legal Systems in Criminal Justice: Indonesia’s Penal Reform Experience.” Architecture Image Studies 6, no. 3 (2025): 1864–80. https://doi.org/10.62754/ais.v6i3.528.
Sulastriyono, Sulastriyono, dan Sartika Intaning Pradhani. “Pemikiran Hukum Adat Djojodigoeno dan Relevansinya Kini.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 30, no. 3 (2018): 448. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.36956.
Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina, dan A’an Efendi. Penelitian hukum (legal research). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.
Susanto, Yoghi Arief, Riski Dysas Prabawani, dan Naily Aulia Najah. “Review of Customary Criminal Law: A Recognition or Reduction in the New Criminal Code.” ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan 19, no. 1 (2025): 81–102. https://doi.org/10.15575/adliya.v19i1.44458.
Susanto, Yoghi Arief, dan Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo. “Customary Criminal Law in the New Criminal Code: Between Positive and Negative Functions.” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research And Analysis 8, no. 6 (2025): 3113–20. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v8-i06-05.
Sutanti, R. D., N. Rochaeti, dan A. R. Damora. “Customary law as an instrument of restorative justice: an alternative approach to criminal conflict resolution in plural legal systems.” Clio. Revista de Historia, Ciencias Humanas y Pensamiento Critico. 5, no. 10 (2025): 1348–81. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15453907.
Syaufi, A. “Social prohibitions as a form of communal value to maintain the interests of the collective life of the Dayak tribe in central Kalimantan.” International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research 8, no. 11 (2019): 44–47. Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85075069490&partnerID=40&md5=df0a292e91432ae154d409d6e2b25a33.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. “Law and Society.” St. John’s Legal Studies Research Paper 09, no. 0167 (2009): 1–24. http://ssrn.com/abstract.
Tijow, Lusiana Margareth, Hoiruddin Hasibuan, dan Hayat Hayat. “The Urgency of Bajo Traditional Law as a Form of Law Enforcement Against the Performers of the Samenleven Delic.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah 19, no. 2 (2021): 256. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v19i2.1422.
Utama, Tody Sasmitha Jiwa. “‘Hukum Yang Hidup’ Dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP): Antara Akomodasi Dan Negasi.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 49, no. 1 (2020): 14. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.1.2020.14-25.
Vincentius Setyawan dan Bariah Safrut. Rethinking Law and Justice: The Core Principles of Critical Legal Studies against Legal Formalism. 10 Oktober 2025. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.17332128.
Yoserwan. Implications of Adat Criminal Law incorporation into the New Indonesian Criminal Code: Strengthening or weakening? 10, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2289599.
Yoserwan, Yoserwan. “Eksistensi Hukum Pidana Adat Dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional Setelah Pengesahan Kuhp Baru.” UNES Law Review 5, no. 4 (2023): 1999–2013. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.577.
Yulia, Rena, Aliyth Prakarsa, dan Mahrus Ali. “Restoring the Conflicts among Societies: How does Baduy Society Settle the Criminal Cases through Restorative Justice?” Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 12, no. 3 (2023): 193. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0071.
Zubaidah, S., S. Muchtar, W. Heryani, dan A. Masum. “Integrating Tradition into Legal Reform: Reconstructing the Role of Reconciliatory Customary Judges in Diversion Processes within the Interplay of Islamic, Customary, and National Law.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani 12, no. 2 (2025): 56–70. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i2.8439.
Downloads
Published
Article ID
41537Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yoghi Arief Susanto, Mohammad Azzayyan Haykal Aditya, Ali Masyhar Mursyid, Edy Sujendro (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
